Improving cancer symptom awareness and help-seeking among adults living in socioeconomically deprived communities in the UK using a facilitated health check: A protocol for the Awareness and Beliefs About Cancer (ABACus) Randomised Control Trial

被引:17
作者
Moriarty, Yvonne [1 ]
Townson, Julia [1 ]
Quinn-Scoggins, Harriet [2 ]
Padgett, Louise [3 ]
Owen, Sioned [4 ]
Smits, Stephanie [2 ]
Playle, Rebecca [1 ]
Dimitropoulou, Polyxeni [1 ]
Sewell, Bernadette [5 ]
Kolovou, Vasiliki [1 ]
Buckle, Peter [10 ]
Carter, Ben [7 ]
Edwards, Adrian [2 ]
Hepburn, Julie [6 ]
Matthews, Maura [4 ]
Mitchell, Caroline [8 ]
Neal, Richard D. [9 ]
Robling, Michael [1 ]
Wood, Fiona [2 ]
Brain, Kate [2 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Ctr Trials Res, Heath Pk, Cardiff CF14 4YS, S Glam, Wales
[2] Cardiff Univ, Sch Med, Div Populat Med, Heath Pk, Cardiff CF14 4YS, S Glam, Wales
[3] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Clin Trials Res, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Tenovus Canc Care, Gleider House,Ty Glas Rd, Cardiff CF14 5BD, S Glam, Wales
[5] Swansea Univ, Coll Human & Hlth Sci, Swansea Ctr Hlth Econ, Singleton Pk, Swansea SA2 8PP, W Glam, Wales
[6] Hlth & Care Res Wales Support Ctr, Publ Involvement Community, Castlebridge 4,15-19 Cowbridge Rd East, Cardiff CF11 9AB, S Glam, Wales
[7] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat Psychol & Neurosci, De Crespigny Pk, London SE5 8AF, England
[8] Univ Sheffield, Northern Gen Hosp, Acad Unit Primary Med Care, Sheffield S5 7AU, S Yorkshire, England
[9] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci, Worsley Bldg,Clarendon Way, Leeds LS2 9NL, W Yorkshire, England
[10] Marie Curie, Marie Curie Res Voices, 89 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7TP, England
关键词
Cancer Awareness; Behaviour Change; Help-seeking; Deprived Communities; Randomised Control Trial; BREAST-CANCER; INTERVENTIONS; INEQUALITIES; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-019-6612-9
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundCancer survival is lower in socioeconomically deprived communities, partly due to low awareness of symptoms, negative beliefs and delayed help-seeking. We developed an interactive health check questionnaire facilitated by trained lay advisors. It entails 29 questions about background, lifestyle and health with tailored behaviour change advice. Personalised results are printed using a traffic light (red/amber/green) system, highlighting areas where action should be taken. This is an individually randomised control trial to test effectiveness of the health check on symptom recognition.MethodsA total 246 participants aged 40+ years will be recruited from community and healthcare settings in socioeconomically deprived areas of Yorkshire and South Wales. Participants will be randomised to receive the health check or standard care (1:1 ratio). Outcome measures include: adapted Awareness and Beliefs about Cancer (primary outcome), brief State Trait Anxiety Inventory, intentions and motivation to adopt recommended health behaviours (early symptom presentation, cancer screening and lifestyle behaviours), adapted Client Service Receipt Inventory, brief medical history/screening and demographic questionnaire at: baseline; 2-weeks; and 6-months post-randomisation. A purposive sample of intervention sessions will be audio-recorded (n=24) and half will additionally be observed (n=12). Semi-structured interviews will take place at 2-weeks (n=30) and 6-months (n=15-20) post-randomisation. The primary analysis will compare cancer symptom recognition scores between arms at 2-weeks. Secondary analysis will assess cancer beliefs, barriers/time to presentation, screening and lifestyle behaviours, anxiety and costs. A process evaluation will assess intervention fidelity, dose and contamination.The London-Surrey NHS Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 17/LO/1507) approved this trial.DiscussionThis is a trial of a theoretically underpinned complex intervention which has undergone phase 1 and 2 development work. The findings will evaluate evidence about the effect of the health check on symptom awareness. Although there are few exclusion criteria there are limitations regarding the population we are able to reach, who may have even higher risks of late diagnosis and poor cancer prognosis. However, the health check has the potential to improve cancer symptom awareness and encourage early help-seeking behaviour in deprived populations, thereby reducing inequalities in longer term cancer outcomes.Trial RegistrationRetrospectively registered with ISRCTN (Ref:ISRCTN16872545) on 12.01.2018.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], GOOD CLIN PRACT GCP
  • [2] Interventions to promote cancer awareness and early presentation: systematic review
    Austoker, J.
    Bankhead, C.
    Forbes, L. J. L.
    Atkins, L.
    Martin, F.
    Robb, K.
    Wardle, J.
    Ramirez, A. J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 101 : S31 - S39
  • [3] Reaching the hard-to-reach: a systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups
    Bonevski, Billie
    Randell, Madeleine
    Paul, Chris
    Chapman, Kathy
    Twyman, Laura
    Bryant, Jamie
    Brozek, Irena
    Hughes, Clare
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2014, 14
  • [4] Braun V., 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, 10.1191/147 88088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/14788088706QP063OA]
  • [5] The fraction of cancer attributable to modifiable risk factors in England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, and the United Kingdom in 2015
    Brown, Katrina F.
    Rumgay, Harriet
    Dunlop, Casey
    Ryan, Margaret
    Quartly, Frances
    Cox, Alison
    Deas, Andrew
    Elliss-Brookes, Lucy
    Gavin, Anna
    Hounsome, Luke
    Huws, Dyfed
    Ormiston-Smith, Nick
    Shelton, Jon
    White, Ceri
    Parkin, D. Max
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 118 (08) : 1130 - 1141
  • [6] Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research
    Cane, James
    O'Connor, Denise
    Michie, Susan
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2012, 7
  • [7] Cardarelli K, 2011, PROG COMM HLTH PARTN, V5, P375
  • [8] SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials
    Chan, An-Wen
    Tetzlaff, Jennifer M.
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Laupacis, Andreas
    Gotzsche, Peter C.
    Krleza-Jeric, Karmela
    Hrobjartsson, Asbjorn
    Mann, Howard
    Dickersin, Kay
    Berlin, Jesse A.
    Dore, Caroline J.
    Parulekar, Wendy R.
    Summerskill, William S. M.
    Groves, Trish
    Schulz, Kenneth F.
    Sox, Harold C.
    Rockhold, Frank W.
    Rennie, Drummond
    Moher, David
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 158 (03) : 200 - +
  • [9] Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance
    Craig, Peter
    Dieppe, Paul
    Macintyre, Sally
    Michie, Susan
    Nazareth, Irwin
    Petticrew, Mark
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 337 (7676): : 979 - 983
  • [10] YOU ARE DANGEROUS TO YOUR HEALTH - IDEOLOGY AND POLITICS OF VICTIM BLAMING
    CRAWFORD, R
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES, 1977, 7 (04): : 663 - 680