Inconsistencies in dew points from different algorithm types possible causes and solutions

被引:7
作者
Starling, KE
Luongo, JF
Hubbard, RA
Lilly, LL
机构
[1] Starling Associates Inc, Norman, OK 73072 USA
[2] John M Campbell & Co, Norman, OK 73072 USA
关键词
natural gas; dew points; vapor-liquid equilibrium; phase envelopes; flash algorithms;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-3812(01)00432-0
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Calculations of natural gas dew points are quite important in the gas processing industry. A number of software packages used by the industry have multiple options for calculations of dew points. One option is to fix the pressure and the software will calculate the dew point temperature. Another option is to have the software generate the phase envelope for the natural gas mixture. A third option is for the user to perform flash calculations at a fixed pressure and varying temperatures until the amount of condensed liquid is arbitrarily small. Sometimes, these three different options yield three different calculated dew points. Because the three different dew point options involve nested iterative loops which solve for liquid and vapor densities and component fugacities as well as the temperature or vapor fraction, the three options should agree within some measure of the different convergence criteria used by the three options, provided the methodology used in a given option does not fail. Examples of dew point calculation differences by the three options are presented and some analysis of which option best represents the equation of state used is given. In addition, possible methods for reducing the inconsistencies are discussed. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 216
页数:8
相关论文
共 2 条
[1]   THE ISOTHERMAL FLASH PROBLEM .2. PHASE-SPLIT CALCULATION [J].
MICHELSEN, ML .
FLUID PHASE EQUILIBRIA, 1982, 9 (01) :21-40
[2]  
MICHELSEN ML, 1982, FLUID PHASE EQUILIBR, V8, P1