Factors affecting internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty

被引:12
作者
Kim, Su Cheol [1 ]
Lee, Je Eun [1 ]
Lee, Sang Min [1 ]
Yoo, Jae Chul [1 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Sch Med, 81 Irwon Ro, Seoul 06351, South Korea
关键词
CUFF TEARS; MOTION; RANGE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PROSTHESIS; ARTHRITIS; OUTCOMES; REPAIR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jos.2020.11.012
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The limitation or loss of internal rotation (IR) after the surgery is a major problem in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). The particular factors associated with postoperative IR remain unclear. We aimed to analyze the predictors of IR after RSA. Methods: We included primary RSA patients with the following implants and a minimum of 1-year follow-up: Wright Aequalis (n = 25), DJO Encore (n = 29), Biomet Comprehensive (n = 40), and Exactech Equinoxe ( n = 29). Age, sex, dominant hand, primary diagnosis, implant type, preoperative critical shoulder angle, pre- and postoperative acromiohumeral distance, lateral offset of implant, glenosphere inclination, peg-glenoid rim distance (PGRD), glenosphere overhang, scapular notching, subscapularis (SSc) repair, pre- and postoperative ROM, and functional scores were assessed. IR was assessed using a 10-point scale based on the following anatomical levels: from the greater trochanter to the buttocks (2 points), from the sacrum to L4 (4 points), from L3 to L1 (6 points), from T12 to T8 (8 points), and from T7 to T1 (10 points). Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify the factors affecting the IR after RSA. Results: One hundred twenty-three shoulders (123 patients) with a mean follow-up of 30.59 +/- 19.55 (range, 12-83) months were evaluated. In the univariable analysis, preoperative diagnosis [odds ratio (OR) = 0.243, P = 0.001], implant type (P = 0.002), PGRD (OR = 1.187, P = 0.003), and preoperative IR (P < 0.001) were found to be factors associated with postoperative IR. Preoperative IR was the only factor associated with postoperative IR in the multivariable analysis (P < 0.001). Patients with preoperative IR scores of 10 or 8 points showed significantly better IR after RSA than those with preoperative IR scores of 2 or 4 points (10 points vs. 2 or 4 points; OR = 15.433, P = 0.002, 8 points vs. 2 or 4 points; OR = 6.078, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Preoperative IR was the only independent factor for IR after RSA. Patients with excellent preoperative IR had better postoperative IR than those with poor preoperative IR. Preoperative diagnosis, implant type, SSc repair, implant lateralization, glenosphere inferior placement, and scapular notching were not identified as independent predictors of IR after RSA in our sample size. (C) 2020 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 138
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Reverse shoulder arthroplasty as salvage for failed prior arthroplasty in patients 65 years of age or younger [J].
Black, Eric M. ;
Roberts, Susanne M. ;
Siegel, Elana ;
Yannopoulos, Paul ;
Higgins, Laurence D. ;
Warner, Jon J. P. .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2014, 23 (07) :1036-1042
[2]   Neer Award 2005: The Grammont reverse shoulder prosthesis: Results in cuff tear arthritis, fracture sequelae, and revision arthroplasty [J].
Boileau, Pascal ;
Watkinson, Duncan ;
Hatzidakis, Armodios M. ;
Hovorka, Istvan .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2006, 15 (05) :527-540
[3]   Complication rates, dislocation, pain, and postoperative range of motion after reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with and without repair of the subscapularis [J].
Clark, Jason C. ;
Ritchie, Joseph ;
Song, Frederick S. ;
Kissenberth, Michael J. ;
Tolan, Stefan J. ;
Hart, Nathan D. ;
Hawkins, Richard J. .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2012, 21 (01) :36-41
[4]  
CONSTANT CR, 1987, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P160
[5]   The influence of subscapularis tendon reattachment on range of motion in reversed shoulder arthroplasty: a clinical study [J].
de Boer F.A. ;
van Kampen P.M. ;
Huijsmans P.E. .
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY, 2016, 100 (2) :121-126
[6]   Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty-from the most to the least common complication [J].
Farshad, Mazda ;
Gerber, Christian .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2010, 34 (08) :1075-1082
[7]   The reverse shoulder prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency - A minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients [J].
Frankle, M ;
Siegal, S ;
Pupello, D ;
Saleem, A ;
Mighell, M ;
Vasey, M .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2005, 87A (08) :1697-1705
[8]   Comparison of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes with and without subscapularis repair [J].
Friedman, Richard J. ;
Flurin, Pierre-Henri ;
Wright, Thomas W. ;
Zuckerman, Joseph D. ;
Roche, Christopher P. .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2017, 26 (04) :662-668
[9]   Does hand-behind-back range of motion accurately reflect shoulder internal rotation? [J].
Ginn, Karen A. ;
Cohen, Milton L. ;
Herbert, Robert D. .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2006, 15 (03) :311-314
[10]  
GOUTALLIER D, 1994, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P78