Pegfilgrastim ± ciprofloxacin for primary prophylaxis with TAC (docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy for breast cancer.: Results from the GEPARTRIO study

被引:118
作者
von Minckwitz, G. [1 ]
Kuemmel, S. [2 ,3 ]
du Bois, A. [4 ]
Eiermann, W. [5 ]
Eidtmann, H. [6 ]
Gerber, B. [7 ]
Hilfrich, J. [8 ]
Huober, J. [9 ]
Costa, S. D. [10 ]
Jackisch, C. [11 ]
Grasshoff, S. -T. [12 ]
Vescia, S.
Skacel, T. [13 ,14 ]
Loibl, S. [15 ]
Mehta, K. M. [1 ]
Kaufmann, M. [15 ]
机构
[1] Univ Frauenklin Frankfurt, German Breast Grp, D-63263 Neu Isenburg, Germany
[2] Univ Frauenklin, Berlin, Germany
[3] Univ Frauenklin, Essen, Germany
[4] Dr Horst Schmidt Klin, Frauenklin, Wiesbaden, Germany
[5] Frauenklin Roten Kreuz, Munich, Germany
[6] Univ Frauenklin Kiel, Kiel, Germany
[7] Univ Frauenklin Rostock, Rostock, Germany
[8] Henrietten Stift, Frauenklin, Hannover, Germany
[9] Univ Frauenklin, Tubingen, Germany
[10] Univ Frauenklin, Magdeburg, Germany
[11] Geburtshilfe & Gynakol Rindes Klin, Frauenklin, Leipzig, Germany
[12] Frauenklin, Quedlinburg, Germany
[13] Amgen Europe GmbH, Luzern, Switzerland
[14] Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med Hematoonkol, Brno, Czech Republic
[15] Univ Frauenklin, Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
breast cancer; ciprofloxacin; docetaxel; febrile neutropenia; granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; primary prophylaxis;
D O I
10.1093/annonc/mdm438
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: TAC (docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) is associated with high incidences of grade 4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia (FN). This analysis compared the efficacies of four regimens for primary prophylaxis of FN and related toxic effects in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant TAC. Patients and methods: Patients with stage T2-T4 primary breast cancer were scheduled to receive 6-8 cycles of TAC. Primary prophylaxis was: ciprofloxacin 500 mg orally twice daily on days 5-14 (n = 253 patients; 1478 cycles), daily granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (filgrastim 5 mu g/kg/day or lenograstim 150 mu g/m(2)/day) on days 5-10 (n = 377; 2400 cycles), pegfilgrastim 6 mg on day 2 (n = 305; 1930 cycles), or pegfilgrastim plus ciprofloxacin (n = 321; 1890 cycles). Results: Pegfilgrastim with/without ciprofloxacin was significantly more effective than daily G-CSF or ciprofloxacin in preventing FN (5% and 7% versus 18% and 22% of patients; all P < 0.001), grade 4 neutropenia, and leukopenia. Pegfilgrastim plus ciprofloxacin completely prevented first cycle FN (P < 0.01 versus pegfilgrastim alone) and fatal neutropenic events. Conclusion: Ciprofloxacin alone, or daily G-CSF from day 5-10 (as in common practice), provided suboptimal protection against FN and related toxic effects in patients receiving TAC. Pegfilgrastim was significantly more effective in this setting, especially if given with ciprofloxacin.
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 298
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphomas and solid tumours [J].
Aapro, M. S. ;
Cameron, D. A. ;
Pettengell, R. ;
Bohlius, J. ;
Crawford, J. ;
Ellis, M. ;
Kearney, N. ;
Lyman, G. H. ;
Tjan-Heijnen, V. C. ;
Walewski, J. ;
Weber, D. C. ;
Zielinski, C. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2006, 42 (15) :2433-2453
[2]  
*AMG, 2002, NEUP SUMM PROD CHAR
[3]   Meta-analysis: Antibiotic prophylaxis reduces mortality in neutropenic patients [J].
Gafter-Gvili, A ;
Fraser, A ;
Paul, M ;
Leibovici, L .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 142 (12) :979-995
[4]   A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy [J].
Green, MD ;
Koelbl, H ;
Baselga, J ;
Galid, A ;
Guillem, V ;
Gascon, P ;
Siena, S ;
Lalisang, RI ;
Samonigg, H ;
Clemens, MR ;
Zani, V ;
Liang, BC ;
Renwick, J ;
Piccart, MJ .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2003, 14 (01) :29-35
[5]   Comparable efficacy and safety profiles of once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim and daily injection filgrastim in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: a multicenter dose-finding study in women with breast cancer [J].
Holmes, FA ;
Jones, SE ;
O'Shaughnessy, J ;
Vukelja, S ;
George, T ;
Savin, M ;
Richards, D ;
Glaspy, J ;
Mesa, L ;
Cohen, G ;
Dhami, M ;
Budman, DR ;
Hackett, J ;
Brassard, M ;
Yang, BB ;
Liang, BC .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2002, 13 (06) :903-909
[6]   2002 guidelines for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer [J].
Hughes, WT ;
Armstrong, D ;
Bodey, GP ;
Bow, EJ ;
Brown, AE ;
Calandra, T ;
Feld, R ;
Pizzo, PA ;
Rolston, KVI ;
Shenep, JL ;
Young, LS .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2002, 34 (06) :730-751
[7]   Optimal timing (preemptive versus supportive) of granulocyte colony-stimulating faster administration following high-dose cyclophosphamide [J].
Koumakis, G ;
Vassilomanolakis, M ;
Barbounis, V ;
Hatzichristou, E ;
Demiri, S ;
Plataniotis, G ;
Pamouktsoglou, F ;
Efremidis, AP .
ONCOLOGY, 1999, 56 (01) :28-35
[8]   Toxicity and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant docetaxel, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide (TAC) or 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (FAC):: impact of adding primary prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to the TAC regimen [J].
Martin, M. ;
Lluch, A. ;
Segui, M. A. ;
Ruiz, A. ;
Ramos, M. ;
Adrover, E. ;
Roriguez-Lescure, A. ;
Grosse, R. ;
Calvo, L. ;
Fernandez-Chacon, C. ;
Roset, M. ;
Anton, A. ;
Isla, D. ;
Martinez del Prado, P. ;
Iglesias, L. ;
Zaluski, J. ;
Arcusa, A. ;
Loez-Vega, J. M. ;
Munoz, M. ;
Mel, J. R. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2006, 17 (08) :1205-1212
[9]   Adjuvant docetaxel for node-positive breast cancer [J].
Martin, M ;
Pienkowski, T ;
Mackey, J ;
Pawlicki, M ;
Guastalla, JP ;
Weaver, C ;
Tomiak, E ;
Al-Tweigeri, T ;
Chap, L ;
Juhos, E ;
Guevin, R ;
Howell, A ;
Fornander, T ;
Hainsworth, J ;
Coleman, R ;
Vinholes, J ;
Modiano, M ;
Pinter, T ;
Tang, SC ;
Colwell, B ;
Prady, C ;
Provencher, L ;
Walde, D ;
Rodriguez-Lescure, A ;
Hugh, J ;
Loret, C ;
Rupin, M ;
Blitz, S ;
Jacobs, P ;
Murawsky, M ;
Riva, A ;
Vogel, C .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (22) :2302-2313
[10]  
MEZA LA, 2005, J CLIN ONCOL, V23