New Plant Venture Performance Differences Among Incumbent, Diversifying, and Entrepreneurial Firms: The Impact of Industry Learning Intensity

被引:29
作者
Balasubramanian, Natarajan [1 ]
机构
[1] Syracuse Univ, Whitman Sch Management, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
关键词
entrepreneurs; learning environment; pre-start-up experience; dynamic capabilities; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; TECHNOLOGICAL DISCONTINUITIES; COMPLEMENTARY ASSETS; AUTOMOBILE-INDUSTRY; SURVIVAL; MARKET; ENTRY; EXPERIENCE; INNOVATION; EVOLUTION;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.1100.1294
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Prior firm experience, firm capabilities, and the industry environment are known to be important determinants of new-venture performance. We hypothesize that firm experience prior to setting up a new venture influences the ability to learn from experience after start-up (which is a key capability), and that this relationship is moderated by the importance of learning by doing within the new venture's industry (which is a critical aspect of the industry environment). We argue that together, these relationships influence performance differences among new plant ventures of incumbents, diversifying entrants, and entrepreneurial (de novo) entrants. Using data on 47,915 new plant ventures in U.S. manufacturing, we find that incumbents and diversifying entrants establish significantly more productive new plants than de novo entrants, and that this advantage significantly increases with the importance of learning by doing in an industry (industry learning intensity). These productivity differences appear to be driven more by learning subsequent to plant start-up than by initial disparities in productivity. Together, these findings strongly suggest that pre-start-up experience adds to the process of post-start-up learning, and that the industry learning environment plays an important role in whether entrepreneurial firms can achieve a competitive advantage over existing firms.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 565
页数:17
相关论文
共 67 条
[31]   The birth of capabilities: market entry and the importance of pre-history [J].
Helfat, CE ;
Lieberman, MB .
INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2002, 11 (04) :725-760
[32]   ARCHITECTURAL INNOVATION - THE RECONFIGURATION OF EXISTING PRODUCT TECHNOLOGIES AND THE FAILURE OF ESTABLISHED FIRMS [J].
HENDERSON, RM ;
CLARK, KB .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1990, 35 (01) :9-30
[33]  
Holbrook D, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P1017, DOI 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1017::AID-SMJ131>3.0.CO
[34]  
2-G
[35]   ENTRY, EXIT, AND FIRM DYNAMICS IN LONG-RUN EQUILIBRIUM [J].
HOPENHAYN, HA .
ECONOMETRICA, 1992, 60 (05) :1127-1150
[36]  
Hubbard RG, 1998, J ECON LIT, V36, P193
[37]  
Karim S, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P1061, DOI 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1061::AID-SMJ116>3.3.CO
[38]  
2-7
[39]  
Katila R, 2005, ACAD MANAGE J, V48, P814, DOI 10.2307/20159699
[40]   The capabilities of new firms and the evolution of the US automobile industry [J].
Klepper, S .
INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2002, 11 (04) :645-666