Variation in Facility-Level Rates of All-Cause and Potentially Preventable 30-Day Hospital Readmissions Among Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries After Discharge From Postacute Inpatient Rehabilitation

被引:6
作者
Malcolm, Matt P. [1 ,2 ]
Middleton, Addie [3 ]
Haas, Allen [4 ]
Ottenbacher, Kenneth J. [4 ]
Graham, James E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Occupat Therapy, 800 Oval Dr, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Colorado Sch Publ Hlth, Aurora, CO USA
[3] Med Univ South Carolina, Div Phys Therapy, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[4] Univ Texas Med Branch, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17559
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE The Improving Medicare Post-Acute Care Transformation Act of 2014 mandated a quality measure of potentially preventable 30-day hospital readmission for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs). Examining IRF performance nationally may help inform health care quality initiatives for Medicare beneficiaries. OBJECTIVE To examine variation in Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Quality Reporting Program measures for US facility-level risk-adjusted all-cause and potentially preventable hospital readmission rates after inpatient rehabilitation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study of Medicare claims data included 454 378 Medicare beneficiaries discharged from 1162 IRFs between June 1, 2013, and July 1, 2015. Data were analyzed March 23, 2018, through June 24, 2019. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES All-Cause Unplanned Readmission Measure for 30 Days Post Discharge From Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities and the Potentially Preventable 30-Day Post-Discharge Readmission Measure for Inpatient Rehabilitation. Specifications from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services were followed to identify the cohort, define outcomes, and calculate risk-standardized facility-level rates. RESULTS Among a cohort of 454 378 patients, the mean (SD) age was 76.2 (10.6) years and 263 546 (58.0%) were women. The all-cause readmission rate was 12.3%(95% CI, 12.2%-12.4%), and the potentially preventable readmission rate was 5.3%(95% CI, 5.3%-5.4%). Across 1162 included IRFs, risk-standardized all-cause readmission rates ranged from 10.1%(95% CI, 8.9%-11.6%) to 15.9% (95% CI, 13.6-18.6%) and potentially preventable readmission rates ranged from 4.3%(95% CI, 3.7%-5.4%) to 7.3%(95% CI, 5.7%-8.3%). Using the All-Cause Unplanned Readmission Measure for 30 Days Post Discharge From Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities, 16 IRFs (1.4%) had 95% CIs above the national mean rate, 1137 IRFs (97.9%) had 95% CIs containing the national mean rate, and 9 IRFs (0.8%) had 95% CIs below the national mean rate. Using the Potentially Preventable 30-Day Post-Discharge Readmission Measure for Inpatient Rehabilitation, 8 IRFs (0.7%) had 95% CIs above the national mean rate, 1153 IRFs (99.2%) had 95% CIs containing the national mean rate, and 1 IRF (0.1%) had a 95% CI below the national mean rate. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This cohort study found that readmission rates were lower when using the Potentially Preventable 30-Day Post-Discharge Readmission Measure for Inpatient Rehabilitation and further reduced discrimination between facilities compared with the recently discontinued All-Cause Unplanned Readmission Measure for 30 Days Post Discharge From Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities. This finding may indicate there is a lack of room for improvement in readmission rates. Given the rationale of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services for removing measures that fail to discriminate quality performance, this suggests that the current readmission measure should not be implemented as part of the Inpatient Rehabilitation Quality Reporting Program.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
American Hospital Association, MOV BUNDL PAYM
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1977, INT CLASS DIS
[3]  
Center for Clinical Standards and Quality, MEAS SPEC MEAS AD FY
[4]  
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Center for Clinical Standards and Quality, 2019 MEAS CONS LIST
[5]  
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2014 MOD SOFTW ICD 9
[6]  
Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services, PROV SERV CURR FIL
[7]   Hospital Cost of Care, Quality of Care, and Readmission Rates Penny Wise and Pound Foolish? [J].
Chen, Lena M. ;
Jha, Ashish K. ;
Guterman, Stuart ;
Ridgway, Abigail B. ;
Orav, E. John ;
Epstein, Arnold M. .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 170 (04) :340-346
[8]   Socioeconomic Risk Adjustment Models for Reimbursement Are Necessary in Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty [J].
Courtney, P. Maxwell ;
Huddleston, James I. ;
Iorio, Richard ;
Markel, David C. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (01) :1-5
[9]  
Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, INSTR IMPL INP REH F
[10]  
Deutsch A, ANAL CROSSCUTTING ME