A novel complementarity between capital and income inequality leads to a significant amplification of the effects of aggregate-demand shocks on consumption. We characterize this finding using a simple model with heterogeneity in household saving and income, nominal rigidities, and capital. A fiscal policy that redistributes capital income causes further amplification, whereas redistributing profits generates dampening. After an interest rate shock, consumption inequality is more countercyclical than income inequality, consistent with the available empirical evidence. Procyclical investment also requires a more aggressive Taylor rule in order to attain determinacy, and aggravates the forward guidance puzzle. (C) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机构:
Austrian Inst Econ Res WIFO, Vienna, Austria
Vienna Univ Econ & Business WU, Dept Socioecon, Vienna, AustriaAustrian Inst Econ Res WIFO, Vienna, Austria
Ederer, Stefan
Rehm, Miriam
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Vienna Univ Econ & Business WU, Dept Socioecon, Vienna, Austria
Univ Duisburg Essen, Inst Socioecon, Duisburg, GermanyAustrian Inst Econ Res WIFO, Vienna, Austria
机构:
Fed Reserve Bank San Francisco, 101 Market St, San Francisco, CA 94105 USAFed Reserve Bank San Francisco, 101 Market St, San Francisco, CA 94105 USA
Liu, Zheng
Spiegel, Mark M.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Fed Reserve Bank San Francisco, 101 Market St, San Francisco, CA 94105 USAFed Reserve Bank San Francisco, 101 Market St, San Francisco, CA 94105 USA
Spiegel, Mark M.
Zhang, Jingyi
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Shanghai, Peoples R ChinaFed Reserve Bank San Francisco, 101 Market St, San Francisco, CA 94105 USA