A structural equation modeling investigation of the emotional value of immersive virtual reality in education

被引:381
作者
Makransky, Guido [1 ]
Lilleholt, Lau [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Oster Farimagsgade 2A, DK-1353 Copenhagen K, Denmark
来源
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT | 2018年 / 66卷 / 05期
关键词
Virtual reality; Emotions; Simulations; Presence; CVTAE; Structural equation modeling; ACHIEVEMENT EMOTIONS; LEARNING OUTCOMES; ENVIRONMENTS; TECHNOLOGY; ACCEPTANCE; MOTIVATION; FRAMEWORK; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s11423-018-9581-2
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Virtual reality (VR) is projected to play an important role in education by increasing student engagement and motivation. However, little is known about the impact and utility of immersive VR for administering e-learning tools, or the underlying mechanisms that impact learners' emotional processes while learning. This paper explores whether differences exist with regard to using either immersive or desktop VR to administer a virtual science learning simulation. We also investigate how the level of immersion impacts perceived learning outcomes using structural equation modeling. The sample consisted of 104 university students (39 females). Significantly higher scores were obtained on 11 of the 13 variables investigated using the immersive VR version of the simulation, with the largest differences occurring with regard to presence and motivation. Furthermore, we identified a model with two general paths by which immersion in VR impacts perceived learning outcomes. Specifically, we discovered an affective path in which immersion predicted presence and positive emotions, and a cognitive path in which immersion fostered a positive cognitive value of the task in line with the control value theory of achievement emotions.
引用
收藏
页码:1141 / 1164
页数:24
相关论文
共 80 条
[61]   Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions [J].
Ryan, RM ;
Deci, EL .
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 25 (01) :54-67
[62]   A model for understanding how virtual reality aids complex conceptual learning [J].
Salzman, MC ;
Dede, C ;
Loftin, RB ;
Chen, J .
PRESENCE-TELEOPERATORS AND VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS, 1999, 8 (03) :293-316
[63]   Research on presence in virtual reality: A survey [J].
Schuemie, MJ ;
Van der Straaten, P ;
Krijn, M ;
Van der Mast, CAPG .
CYBERPSYCHOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2001, 4 (02) :183-201
[64]  
Singer Natasha., 2015, The New York Times
[65]   A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): Speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments [J].
Slater, M ;
Wilbur, S .
PRESENCE-VIRTUAL AND AUGMENTED REALITY, 1997, 6 (06) :603-616
[66]   Computer Simulations to Support Science Instruction and Learning: A critical review of the literature [J].
Smetana, Lara Kathleen ;
Bell, Randy L. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2012, 34 (09) :1337-1370
[67]   Head-mounted display versus desktop for 3D navigation in virtual reality: a user study [J].
Sousa Santos, Beatriz ;
Dias, Paulo ;
Pimentel, Angela ;
Baggerman, Jan-Willem ;
Ferreira, Carlos ;
Silva, Samuel ;
Madeira, Joaquim .
MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2009, 41 (01) :161-181
[68]  
Standen P.J., 2006, VIRTUAL REAL-LONDON, V10, P241, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10055-006-0042-6
[69]   Immersive virtual reality as a teaching tool for neuroanatomy [J].
Stepan, Katelyn ;
Zeiger, Joshua ;
Hanchuk, Stephanie ;
Del Signore, Anthony ;
Shrivastava, Raj ;
Govindaraj, Satish ;
Iloreta, Alfred .
INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2017, 7 (10) :1006-1013
[70]   Presence, memory and interaction in virtual environments [J].
Sutcliffe, A ;
Gault, B ;
Shin, JE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2005, 62 (03) :307-327