Machine Learning for Predicting the 3-Year Risk of Incident Diabetes in Chinese Adults

被引:21
作者
Wu, Yang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hu, Haofei [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Cai, Jinlin [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Chen, Runtian [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zuo, Xin [7 ]
Cheng, Heng [7 ]
Yan, Dewen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Shenzhen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Endocrinol, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[2] Shenzhen Second Peoples Hosp, Dept Endocrinol, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[3] Shenzhen Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[4] Shenzhen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Nephrol, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[5] Shenzhen Second Peoples Hosp, Dept Nephrol, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[6] Shantou Univ, Med Coll, Shantou, Peoples R China
[7] Third Peoples Hosp Shenzhen, Dept Endocrinol, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
关键词
machine learning; extreme gradient boosting; simple stepwise model; Incident diabetes; risk; TYPE-2; MELLITUS; MODELS; COMPLICATIONS; NOMOGRAM; TRENDS; IMPACT; BMI;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2021.626331
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Purpose: We aimed to establish and validate a risk assessment system that combines demographic and clinical variables to predict the 3-year risk of incident diabetes in Chinese adults. Methods: A 3-year cohort study was performed on 15,928 Chinese adults without diabetes at baseline. All participants were randomly divided into a training set (n = 7,940) and a validation set (n = 7,988). XGBoost method is an effective machine learning technique used to select the most important variables from candidate variables. And we further established a stepwise model based on the predictors chosen by the XGBoost model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), decision curve and calibration analysis were used to assess discrimination, clinical use and calibration of the model, respectively. The external validation was performed on a cohort of 11,113 Japanese participants. Result: In the training and validation sets, 148 and 145 incident diabetes cases occurred. XGBoost methods selected the 10 most important variables from 15 candidate variables. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG), body mass index (BMI) and age were the top 3 important variables. And we further established a stepwise model and a prediction nomogram. The AUCs of the stepwise model were 0.933 and 0.910 in the training and validation sets, respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed a perfect fit between the predicted diabetes risk and the observed diabetes risk (p = 0.068 for the training set, p = 0.165 for the validation set). Decision curve analysis presented the clinical use of the stepwise model and there was a wide range of alternative threshold probability spectrum. And there were almost no the interactions between these predictors (most P-values for interaction >0.05). Furthermore, the AUC for the external validation set was 0.830, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test for the external validation set showed no statistically significant difference between the predicted diabetes risk and observed diabetes risk (P = 0.824). Conclusion: We established and validated a risk assessment system for characterizing the 3-year risk of incident diabetes.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Predicting diabetes mellitus using SMOTE and ensemble machine learning approach: The Henry Ford ExercIse Testing (FIT) project [J].
Alghamdi, Manal ;
Al-Mallah, Mouaz ;
Keteylan, Steven ;
Brawner, Clinton ;
Ehrman, Jonathan ;
Sakr, Sherif .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (07)
[2]   A Predictive Metabolic Signature for the Transition From Gestational Diabetes Mellitus to Type 2 Diabetes [J].
Allalou, Amina ;
Nalla, Amarnadh ;
Prentice, Kacey J. ;
Liu, Ying ;
Zhang, Ming ;
Dai, Feihan F. ;
Ning, Xian ;
Osborne, Lucy R. ;
Cox, Brian J. ;
Gunderson, Erica P. ;
Wheeler, Michael B. .
DIABETES, 2016, 65 (09) :2529-2539
[3]  
[Anonymous], ery and Data Mining, DOI DOI 10.1145/2939672.2939785
[4]   Impact of BMI and the Metabolic Syndrome on the Risk of Diabetes in Middle-Aged Men [J].
Arnlov, Johan ;
Sundstrom, Johan ;
Ingelsson, Erik ;
Lind, Lars .
DIABETES CARE, 2011, 34 (01) :61-65
[5]   Metabolic Surgery in the Treatment Algorithm for Type 2 Diabetes A Joint Statement by International Diabetes Organizations [J].
Brito, Juan P. ;
Montori, Victor M. ;
Davis, Andrew M. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 317 (06) :635-636
[6]   Prediction of progression from pre-diabetes to diabetes: Development and validation of a machine learning model [J].
Cahn, Avivit ;
Shoshan, Avi ;
Sagiv, Tal ;
Yesharim, Rachel ;
Goshen, Ran ;
Shalev, Varda ;
Raz, Itamar .
DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2020, 36 (02)
[7]   Next-Generation Machine Learning for Biological Networks [J].
Camacho, Diogo M. ;
Collins, Katherine M. ;
Powers, Rani K. ;
Costello, James C. ;
Collins, James J. .
CELL, 2018, 173 (07) :1581-1592
[8]   Aging and insulin secretion [J].
Chang, AM ;
Halter, JB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM, 2003, 284 (01) :E7-E12
[9]   Prediction and Risk Stratification of Kidney Outcomes in Iga Nephropathy [J].
Chen, Tingyu ;
Li, Xiang ;
Li, Yingxue ;
Xia, Eryu ;
Qin, Yong ;
Liang, Shaoshan ;
Xu, Feng ;
Liang, Dandan ;
Zeng, Caihong ;
Liu, Zhihong .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2019, 74 (03) :300-309
[10]   Association of body mass index and age with incident diabetes in Chinese adults: a population-based cohort study [J].
Chen, Ying ;
Zhang, Xiao-Ping ;
Yuan, Jie ;
Cai, Bo ;
Wang, Xiao-Li ;
Wu, Xiao-Li ;
Zhang, Yue-Hua ;
Zhang, Xiao-Yi ;
Yin, Tong ;
Zhu, Xiao-Hui ;
Gu, Yun-Juan ;
Cui, Shi-Wei ;
Lu, Zhi-Qiang ;
Li, Xiao-Ying .
BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (09)