Metacognition in Monkeys During an Oculomotor Task

被引:32
作者
Middlebrooks, Paul G. [1 ,2 ]
Sommer, Marc A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Ctr Neurosci, Dept Neurosci, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Ctr Neural Basis Cognit, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Ctr Cognit Neurosci, Durham, NC 27706 USA
关键词
cognitive neuroscience; metacognition; decision making; eye movements; monitoring; FRONTAL EYE FIELD; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; WORKING-MEMORY; RHESUS-MONKEYS; CONFIDENCE; RECOGNITION; METAMEMORY; AWARENESS; ACCURACY; DECISION;
D O I
10.1037/a0021611
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This study investigated whether rhesus monkeys show evidence of metacognition in a reduced, visual oculomotor task that is particularly suitable for use in fMRI and electrophysiology. The 2-stage task involved punctate visual stimulation and saccadic eye movement responses. lit each trial, monkeys made a decision and then made a bet. To earn maximum reward, they had to monitor their decision and use that information to bet advantageously. Two monkeys learned to base their bets on their decisions within a few weeks. We implemented an operational definition of metacognitive behavior that relied on trial-by-trial analyses and signal detection theory. Both monkeys exhibited metacognition according to these quantitative criteria. Neither external visual cues nor potential reaction time cues explained the betting behavior; the animals seemed to rely exclusively on internal traces of their decisions. We documented the learning process of one monkey. During a 10-session transition phase, betting switched from random to a decision-based strategy. The results reinforce previous findings of metacognitive ability in monkeys and may facilitate the neurophysiological investigation of metacognitive functions.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 337
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Functional MRI in Macaque Monkeys during Task Switching
    Premereur, Elsie
    Janssen, Peter
    Vanduffel, Wim
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 38 (50) : 10619 - 10630
  • [12] Metacognition in working memory: Confidence judgments during an n-back task
    Conte, Nadia
    Fairfield, Beth
    Padulo, Caterina
    Pelegrina, Santiago
    CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2023, 111
  • [13] The temporal dynamics of metacognition: Dissociating task-related activity from later metacognitive processes
    Desender, Kobe
    Van Opstal, Filip
    Hughes, Gethin
    Van den Bussche, Eva
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2016, 82 : 54 - 64
  • [14] Effects of ketamine on brain function during metacognition of episodic memory
    Lehmann, Mirko
    Neumann, Claudia
    Wasserthal, Sven
    Schultz, Johannes
    Delis, Achilles
    Trautner, Peter
    Hurlemann, Rene
    Ettinger, Ulrich
    NEUROSCIENCE OF CONSCIOUSNESS, 2021, 7 (01)
  • [15] Metacognition during unfamiliar face matching
    Kramer, Robin S. S.
    Gous, Georgina
    Mireku, Michael O.
    Ward, Robert
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 113 (03) : 696 - 717
  • [16] Age-related decreases in global metacognition are independent of local metacognition and task performance
    McWilliams, Andrew
    Bibby, Hannah
    Steinbeis, Nikolaus
    David, Anthony S.
    Fleming, Stephen M.
    COGNITION, 2023, 235
  • [17] Prefrontal activity predicts monkeys' decisions during an auditory category task
    Lee, Jung H.
    Russ, Brian E.
    Orr, Lauren E.
    Cohen, Yale E.
    FRONTIERS IN INTEGRATIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 3
  • [18] Metacognition for strategy selection during arithmetic problem-solving in young and older adults
    Geurten, Marie
    Lemaire, Patrick
    AGING NEUROPSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITION, 2019, 26 (03) : 424 - 446
  • [19] Resilience of perceptual metacognition in a dual-task paradigm
    Mahiko Konishi
    Clémence Compain
    Bruno Berberian
    Jérôme Sackur
    Vincent de Gardelle
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2020, 27 : 1259 - 1268
  • [20] Resilience of perceptual metacognition in a dual-task paradigm
    Konishi, Mahiko
    Compain, Clemence
    Berberian, Bruno
    Sackur, Jerome
    de Gardelle, Vincent
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2020, 27 (06) : 1259 - 1268