Metacognition in Monkeys During an Oculomotor Task

被引:33
作者
Middlebrooks, Paul G. [1 ,2 ]
Sommer, Marc A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Ctr Neurosci, Dept Neurosci, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Ctr Neural Basis Cognit, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Ctr Cognit Neurosci, Durham, NC 27706 USA
关键词
cognitive neuroscience; metacognition; decision making; eye movements; monitoring; FRONTAL EYE FIELD; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; WORKING-MEMORY; RHESUS-MONKEYS; CONFIDENCE; RECOGNITION; METAMEMORY; AWARENESS; ACCURACY; DECISION;
D O I
10.1037/a0021611
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This study investigated whether rhesus monkeys show evidence of metacognition in a reduced, visual oculomotor task that is particularly suitable for use in fMRI and electrophysiology. The 2-stage task involved punctate visual stimulation and saccadic eye movement responses. lit each trial, monkeys made a decision and then made a bet. To earn maximum reward, they had to monitor their decision and use that information to bet advantageously. Two monkeys learned to base their bets on their decisions within a few weeks. We implemented an operational definition of metacognitive behavior that relied on trial-by-trial analyses and signal detection theory. Both monkeys exhibited metacognition according to these quantitative criteria. Neither external visual cues nor potential reaction time cues explained the betting behavior; the animals seemed to rely exclusively on internal traces of their decisions. We documented the learning process of one monkey. During a 10-session transition phase, betting switched from random to a decision-based strategy. The results reinforce previous findings of metacognitive ability in monkeys and may facilitate the neurophysiological investigation of metacognitive functions.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 337
页数:13
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics
[2]  
Benjamin A.S., 1996, IMPLICIT MEMORY META, P309
[3]   The mismeasure of memory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index [J].
Benjamin, AS ;
Bjork, RA ;
Schwartz, BL .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1998, 127 (01) :55-68
[4]   Processes leading to confidence and accuracy in sentence recognition: A metamemory approach [J].
Brewer, William F. ;
Sampalo, Cristina .
MEMORY, 2006, 14 (05) :540-552
[5]   STUDYING RELATED PICTURES CAN REDUCE ACCURACY, BUT INCREASE CONFIDENCE, IN A MODIFIED RECOGNITION TEST [J].
CHANDLER, CC .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1994, 22 (03) :273-280
[6]   Understanding metamemory: Neural correlates of the cognitive process and subjective level of confidence in recognition memory [J].
Chua, EF ;
Schacter, DL ;
Rand-Glovannetti, E ;
Sperling, RA .
NEUROIMAGE, 2006, 29 (04) :1150-1160
[7]   Getting technical about awareness [J].
Clifford, Colin W. G. ;
Arabzadeh, Ehsan ;
Harris, Justin A. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2008, 12 (02) :54-58
[8]   CONFIDENCE LEVEL AND FEELING OF KNOWING IN QUESTION ANSWERING - THE WEIGHT OF INFERENTIAL PROCESSES [J].
COSTERMANS, J ;
LORIES, G ;
ANSAY, C .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1992, 18 (01) :142-150
[9]   BLINDSIGHT IN MONKEYS [J].
COWEY, A ;
STOERIG, P .
NATURE, 1995, 373 (6511) :247-249
[10]   Corollary discharge across the animal kingdom [J].
Crapse, Trinity B. ;
Sommer, Marc A. .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 9 (08) :587-600