Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in animal health, performance, and on-farm food safety: a scoping review

被引:8
作者
Vriezen, Rachael [1 ]
Sargeant, Jan M. [1 ,2 ]
Vriezen, Ellen [1 ]
Reist, Mark [1 ,2 ]
Winder, Charlotte B. [1 ,2 ]
O'Connor, Annette M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Ontario Vet Coll, Dept Populat Med, Guelph, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Guelph, Ctr Publ Hlth & Zoonoses, Guelph, ON, Canada
[3] Iowa State Univ, Dept Vet Diagnost & Prod Anim Med, Ames, IA USA
关键词
Animal health; animal performance; meta-analysis; on-farm food safety; scoping review; systematic review;
D O I
10.1017/S1466252319000197
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are used to summarize and interpret evidence for clinical decision-making in human health. The extent of the application of these methods in veterinary medicine and animal agriculture is unknown. The goal of this scoping study was to ascertain trends in the publication of systematic reviews and meta-analyses examining animal health, animal performance, and on-farm food safety. Online databases were searched for reviews published between 1993 and 2018 that focused on relevant outcomes in domestic livestock, companion animals, or wildlife species. In total 1787 titles and abstracts underwent data characterization. Dairy cattle, fish, and pigs were the most common target commodity groups. Few articles investigated both health and performance outcomes (only health: n = 418; only performance: n = 701; both health and performance: n = 103). Most of the reviews (67.6%, n = 1208/1787) described a meta-analysis but did not state in the title or abstract that a systematic review was also conducted, which is potentially problematic. Adherence to reporting guidelines is recommended for all systematic reviews and meta-analyses. For research areas with many reviews, an evidence repository is recommended. For less well-reviewed areas, additional investigation may be necessary to identify the reasons for the lack of synthesis research.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 127
页数:12
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], EFSA J
  • [2] [Anonymous], KIDNEY INT
  • [3] [Anonymous], VETSREV
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2016, CIRE ANTILLES GUYANE
  • [5] Arksey H., 2005, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V8, P19, DOI [10.1080/1364557032000119616, DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616, DOI 10.1080/1364-557032000119616]
  • [6] PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts
    Beller, Elaine M.
    Glasziou, Paul P.
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Hopewell, Sally
    Bastian, Hilda
    Chalmers, Iain
    Gotzsche, Peter C.
    Lasserson, Toby
    Tovey, David
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2013, 10 (04)
  • [7] Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team's experience with Arksey and O'Malley's framework
    Daudt, Helena M. L.
    van Mossel, Catherine
    Scott, Samantha J.
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2013, 13
  • [8] Khan K., 2011, SYSTEMATIC REV SUPPO
  • [9] Scoping studies: advancing the methodology
    Levac, Danielle
    Colquhoun, Heather
    O'Brien, Kelly K.
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2010, 5
  • [10] Liberati A, 2009, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V339, DOI [10.1136/bmj.b2700, 10.1136/bmj.b2535, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.07.299, 10.1136/bmj.i4086, 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1]