Physical characterization of aerosol emissions from a commercial gas turbine engine

被引:49
作者
Lobo, Prem
Hagen, Donald E.
Whitefield, Philip D.
Alofs, Darryl J.
机构
[1] University of Missouri-Rolla, Rolla
[2] Center of Excellence for Aerospace Particulate Emissions Reduction Research
[3] Cloud and Aerosol Sciences Laboratory, Center of Excellence for Aerospace Particulate Emissions Reduction Research
[4] Department of Mechanical Engineering, Center of Excellence for Aerospace Particulate Emissions Reduction Research
关键词
D O I
10.2514/1.26772
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
This paper discusses the results of the Aircraft Particle Emissions Experiment Project for the physical characterization of total (nonvolatile plus volatile) aerosol emissions (emission factors, hydration properties, and distribution shape parameters) by extractive sampling from an on-wing CFM56-2C1 engine. Samples were extracted at the engine exit plane (1 m) as well as locations 10 and 30 m downstream. Three different fuels were used in this study: base fuel, high-sulfur fuel, and high-aromatic fuel. For the 1 and 10-m probe locations, strong and sometimes nonlinear dependencies were observed on fuel flow rate and no statistically significant dependencies were observed for fuel composition. At 30 m, the onset of gas-to-particle conversion was apparent for low-to medium-fuel flow rates. The soluble mass fraction was found to increase with distance from the engine exit plane and with increasing fuel aromatic and sulfur content. An intercomparison of gas and particle sampling trains showed that gas-to-particle conversion is a serious sample train artifact for gas sampling trains in which dilution cannot be achieved at the probe tip.
引用
收藏
页码:919 / 929
页数:11
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
ALOFS DJ, 1978, J APPL METEOROL, V17, P1286, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1978)017<1286:POADRC>2.0.CO
[2]  
2
[3]  
ALOFS DJ, 1981, J RECH ATMOS, V15, P219
[4]  
[Anonymous], GEOPHYS RES LETT
[5]  
Baron P.A., 2001, AEROSOL MEASUREMENT, V2nd
[6]   Description and theoretical analysis of a differential mobility spectrometer [J].
Biskos, G ;
Reavell, K ;
Collings, N .
AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 39 (06) :527-541
[7]  
BISKOS G, 2003, J AEROSOL SCI, V1, pS67
[8]   Aviation fuel tracer simulation: Model intercomparison and implications [J].
Danilin, MY ;
Fahey, DW ;
Schumann, U ;
Prather, MJ ;
Penner, JE ;
Ko, MKW ;
Weisenstein, DK ;
Jackman, CH ;
Pitari, G ;
Kohler, I ;
Sausen, R ;
Weaver, CJ ;
Douglass, AR ;
Connell, PS ;
Kinnison, DE ;
Dentener, FJ ;
Fleming, EL ;
Berntsen, TK ;
Isaksen, ISA ;
Haywood, JM ;
Karcher, B .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1998, 25 (21) :3947-3950
[9]   The susceptibility of ice formation in upper tropospheric clouds to insoluble aerosol components [J].
DeMott, PJ ;
Rogers, DC ;
Kreidenweis, SM .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1997, 102 (D16) :19575-19584
[10]  
Detwiler A., 1984, J WEA MOD, V16, P46