NRG Oncology National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Decision-Making Project-1 Results: Decision Making in Breast Cancer Risk Reduction

被引:17
|
作者
Holmberg, Christine [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Bandos, Hanna [5 ,6 ]
Fagerlin, Angela [7 ,8 ,9 ,10 ]
Bevers, Therese B. [11 ]
Battaglia, Tracy A. [12 ,13 ]
Wickerham, D. Lawrence [5 ,14 ]
McCaskill-Stevens, Worta J. [15 ]
机构
[1] Charite, Inst Publ Hlth, Seestr 73 Haus 10, D-13347 Berlin, Germany
[2] Free Univ Berlin, Seestr 73 Haus 10, D-13347 Berlin, Germany
[3] Humboldt Univ, Seestr 73 Haus 10, D-13347 Berlin, Germany
[4] Berlin Inst Hlth, Seestr 73 Haus 10, D-13347 Berlin, Germany
[5] NRG Oncol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[6] Univ Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[7] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Dept Populat Hlth, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[8] VA Salt Lake City, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[9] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[10] VA Ann Arbor Ctr Clin Management, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[11] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Clin Canc Prevent, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[12] Boston Med Ctr, Dept Med, Womens Hlth Unit, Sect Gen Internal Med, Boston, MA USA
[13] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[14] Allegheny Hlth Network Canc Inst, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[15] NCI, Community Oncol & Prevent Trials Res Grp, Breast Canc Prevent, Div Canc Prevent, Rockville, MD USA
关键词
PREVENTIVE THERAPY; RALOXIFENE STAR; TAMOXIFEN; ADHERENCE; CHEMOPREVENTION; PARTICIPATION; METAANALYSIS; BARRIERS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-17-0076
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) reduce breast cancer risk. Adoption of SERMs as prevention medication remains low. This is the first study to quantify social, cultural, and psychologic factors driving decision making regarding SERM use in women counseled on breast cancer prevention options. A survey study was conducted with women counseled by a health care provider (HCP) about SERMs. A statistical comparison of responses was performed between those who decided to use and those who decided not to use SERMs. Independent factors associated with the decision were determined using logistic regression. Of 1,023 participants, 726 made a decision: 324 (44.6%) decided to take a SERM and 402 (55.4%) decided not to. The most important factor for deciding on SERM use was the HCP recommendation. Other characteristics associated with the decision included attitudes and perceptions regarding medication intake, breast cancer worry, trust in HCP, family members with blood clots, and others' experiences with SERMs. The odds of SERM intake whenHCPrecommended were higher for participants with a positive attitude toward taking medications than for those with a negative attitude (P-interaction - 0.01). This study highlights the importance of social and cultural aspects for SERM decision making, most importantly personal beliefs and experiences. HCPs' recommendations play a statistically significant role in decision making and are more likely to be followed if in line with patients' attitudes. Results indicate the need for developing interventions for HCPs that not only focus on the presentation of medical information but, equally as important, on addressing patients' beliefs and experiences.
引用
收藏
页码:625 / 634
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Preoperative genetic testing affects surgical decision making in breast cancer patients
    Lokich, Elizabeth
    Stuckey, Ashley
    Raker, Christina
    Wilbur, Jennifer Scalia
    Laprise, Jessica
    Gass, Jennifer
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2014, 134 (02) : 326 - 330
  • [32] Shared Decision-making in Breast Cancer Reconstructive Surgery: Experience in a Leading Hospital
    de la Muela, Maria Herrera
    Medrano, Santiago Sanz
    Leyva, Francisco
    Jurado, Inmaculada Masa
    Ortiz, Ana I. Membrilla
    Sanchez, Juana Brenes
    de la Puente Yague, Miriam
    Rodriguez, Jorge Ruiz
    Perez, Javier Buendia
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2024, 12 (05)
  • [33] Active Participation in Decision-Making in Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy for Patients With Breast Cancer
    Huang, Julian
    Chagpar, Anees
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 242 : 129 - 135
  • [34] Reconfiguring Priorities: Breastfeeding Decision-making Among Young Breast Cancer Survivors
    Huertas-Zurriaga, Ariadna
    Cabrera-Jaime, Sandra
    Navarri, Isabel
    Teruel-Garcia, Iris
    Leyva-Moral, Juan Manuel
    CANCER NURSING, 2025,
  • [35] Breast Cancer Treatment Decision-Making: Are We Asking Too Much of Patients?
    Livaudais, Jennifer C.
    Franco, Rebeca
    Fei, Kezhen
    Bickell, Nina A.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 28 (05) : 630 - 636
  • [36] Decision-Making in Breast Cancer Surgery: Where Do Patients Go for Information?
    Schmidt, Hank
    Cohen, Almog
    Mandeli, John
    Weltz, Christina
    Port, Elisa R.
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2016, 82 (05) : 397 - 402
  • [37] Impact of Multigene Panel Testing on Surgical Decision Making in Breast Cancer Patients
    Pederson, Holly J.
    Gopalakrishnan, Dharmesh
    Noss, Ryan
    Yanda, Courtney
    Eng, Charis
    Grobmyer, Stephen R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2018, 226 (04) : 560 - 565
  • [38] Decision-making for bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy for an increased lifetime breast cancer risk: A qualitative metasynthesis
    Torrisi, Christa
    Wareg, Nuha K.
    Anbari, Allison Brandt
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2024, 33 (03)
  • [39] Update of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) P-2 Trial: Preventing Breast Cancer
    Vogel, Victor G.
    Costantino, Joseph P.
    Wickerham, D. Lawrence
    Cronin, Walter M.
    Cecchini, Reena S.
    Atkins, James N.
    Bevers, Therese B.
    Fehrenbacher, Louis
    Pajon, Eduardo R.
    Wade, James L., III
    Robidoux, Andre
    Margolese, Richard G.
    James, Joan
    Runowicz, Carolyn D.
    Ganz, Patricia A.
    Reis, Steven E.
    McCaskill-Stevens, Worta
    Ford, Leslie G.
    Jordan, V. Craig
    Wolmark, Norman
    CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH, 2010, 3 (06) : 696 - 706
  • [40] Shared decision-making in medical encounters regarding breast cancer treatment: the contribution of methodological triangulation
    Durif-Bruckert, C.
    Roux, P.
    Morelle, M.
    Mignotte, H.
    Faure, C.
    Moumjid-Ferdjaoui, N.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2015, 24 (04) : 461 - 472