Opening the 'Black Box': An Overview of Methods to Investigate the Decision-Making Process in Choice-Based Surveys

被引:13
作者
Rigby, Dan [1 ]
Vass, Caroline [2 ]
Payne, Katherine [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Social Sci, Econ, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Div Populat Hlth Hlth Serv Res & Primary Care, Manchester Ctr Hlth Econ, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
关键词
TIME-TO-THINK; DISCRETE-CHOICE; EYE-TRACKING; VISUAL-ATTENTION; RESPONSE LATENCY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM EEG; CONTINGENT VALUATION; CONSUMER PREFERENCES; RESPONDENTS TIME; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1007/s40271-019-00385-8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The desire to understand the preferences of patients, healthcare professionals and the public continues to grow. Health valuation studies, often in the form of discrete choice experiments, a choice based survey approach, proliferate as a result. A variety of methods of pre-choice process analysis have been developed to investigate how and why people make their decisions in such experiments and surveys. These techniques have been developed to investigate how people acquire and process information and make choices. These techniques offer the potential to test and improve theories of choice and/or associated empirical models. This paper provides an overview of such methods, with the focus on their use in stated choice-based healthcare studies. The methods reviewed are eye tracking, mouse tracing, brain imaging, deliberation time analysis and think aloud. For each method, we summarise the rationale, implementation, type of results generated and associated challenges, along with a discussion of possible future developments.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 41
页数:11
相关论文
共 94 条
  • [1] ON USING RESPONSE LATENCY TO MEASURE PREFERENCE
    AAKER, DA
    BAGOZZI, RP
    CARMAN, JM
    MACLACHLAN, JM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1980, 17 (02) : 237 - 244
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2014, NVIVO QUAL DAT AN SO
  • [3] [Anonymous], J APPL EC
  • [4] [Anonymous], EMOTIV BIOINF
  • [5] [Anonymous], YAL SCH MED MRI US C
  • [6] Arieli A., 2009, FOERDER I EC RES WOR
  • [7] ATLAS.ti, 2014, ATLAS TI
  • [8] How the brain integrates costs and benefits during decision making
    Basten, Ulrike
    Biele, Guido
    Heekeren, Hauke R.
    Fiebach, Christian J.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (50) : 21767 - 21772
  • [9] DOES THE NUMBER OF CHOICE SETS MATTER? RESULTS FROM A WEB SURVEY APPLYING A DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT
    Bech, Mickael
    Kjaer, Trine
    Lauridsen, Jorgen
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2011, 20 (03) : 273 - 286
  • [10] An efficient methodology for assessing attention to and effect of nutrition information displayed front-of-pack
    Bialkova, Svetlana
    van Trijp, Hans C. M.
    [J]. FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2011, 22 (06) : 592 - 601