Low-cost action cameras offer potential for widespread acoustic monitoring of marine ecosystems

被引:17
|
作者
Chapuis, Lucille [1 ]
Williams, Ben [1 ]
Gordon, Timothy A. C. [1 ,2 ]
Simpson, Stephen D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Coll Life & Environm Sci, Biosci, Exeter EX4 4PS, Devon, England
[2] Mars Inc, 6885 Elm St, Mclean, VA 22101 USA
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会; 瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Bioacoustics; Ecoacoustics; Soundscape ecology; Passive acoustic monitoring; Coral reef; GoPro; Hydrophone; INDEXES; BIODIVERSITY; SOUNDSCAPE; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107957
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Underwater passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) is of growing importance for monitoring the health of aquatic environments. Standard practices use expensive hydrophones to sample soundscapes. They must either be linked to surface recording rigs or use autonomous instrumentation which comes at a premium cost. Although citizen science projects could be of great value to PAM by increasing the number of underwater recordings collected around the world, there is a lack of available low-cost and user-friendly recording hardware. However, consumer-grade action cameras potentially offer an accessible alternative to traditional hydrophones, capable of capturing underwater acoustic recordings. We evaluated the performance of two models of GoPro underwater action cameras deployed as PAM recorders. We tested these cameras against a research-grade hydrophone in a range of shallow tropical sea environments. First, in a sandy area away from reef habitat, we took simultaneous recordings of loudspeaker playbacks of known acoustic signals using all three instruments. We then performed repeated deployments on different coral reef sites in which all three instruments were placed side-by-side to record simultaneously the same natural reef soundscapes. We calculated eight of the most commonly used ecoacoustic indices used in marine soundscape ecology, and assessed the reliability and quantitative accuracy of these compared to the hydrophone. Although not calibrated, GoPros captured recordings from which selected ecoacoustic indices could be calculated reliably, including temporal variability, the acoustic complexity index and acoustic richness. Metrics derived from GoPros can be valuably compared between recordings taken using the same model, but are not directly comparable with hydrophone-derived values. We outline the best settings for collecting soundscape data with GoPros. Underwater action cameras are used frequently by marine scientists, sports enthusiasts and tourists around the world. Their capacity to capture soundscape recordings represents a valuable approach for the global expansion of PAM through citizen science.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] HydroMoth: Testing a prototype low-cost acoustic recorder for aquatic environments
    Lamont, Timothy A. C.
    Chapuis, Lucille
    Williams, Ben
    Dines, Sasha
    Gridley, Tess
    Frainer, Guilherme
    Fearey, Jack
    Maulana, Permas B.
    Prasetya, Mochyudho E.
    Jompa, Jamaluddin
    Smith, David J.
    Simpson, Stephen D.
    REMOTE SENSING IN ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2022, 8 (03) : 362 - 378
  • [2] Low-Cost Acoustic Cameras for Underwater Wideband Passive Imaging
    Trucco, Andrea
    Martelli, Samuele
    Crocco, Marco
    IEEE JOURNAL OF OCEANIC ENGINEERING, 2015, 40 (04) : 929 - 937
  • [3] A low-cost approach in acoustic monitoring of dolphin presence
    De Marco, Rocco
    Di Nardo, Francesco
    Lucchetti, Alessandro
    Virgili, Massimo
    Petetta, Andrea
    Veli, Daniel Li
    Screpanti, Laura
    Bartolucci, Veronica
    Scaradozzi, David
    2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON METROLOGY FOR THE SEA LEARNING TO MEASURE SEA HEALTH PARAMETERS (METROSEA), 2022, : 303 - 307
  • [4] Acoustic localisation of wildlife with low-cost equipment: lower sensitivity, but no loss of precision
    Smith, Bethany R.
    Root-Gutteridge, Holly
    Butkiewicz, Hannah
    Dassow, Angela
    Fontaine, Amy C.
    Markham, Andrew
    Owens, Jessica
    Schindler, Loretta
    Wijers, Matthew
    Kershenbaum, Arik
    WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2022, 49 (04) : 372 - 381
  • [5] The Development of a Low-Cost Hydrophone for Passive Acoustic Monitoring of Dolphin's Vocalizations
    De Marco, Rocco
    Di Nardo, Francesco
    Lucchetti, Alessandro
    Virgili, Massimo
    Petetta, Andrea
    Li Veli, Daniel
    Screpanti, Laura
    Bartolucci, Veronica
    Scaradozzi, David
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (07)
  • [6] Mapping of the Acoustic Environment at an Urban Park in the City Area of Milan, Italy, Using Very Low-Cost Sensors
    Benocci, Roberto
    Potenza, Andrea
    Bisceglie, Alessandro
    Roman, Hector Eduardo
    Zambon, Giovanni
    SENSORS, 2022, 22 (09)
  • [7] Deploying Acoustic Detection Algorithms on Low-Cost, Open-Source Acoustic Sensors for Environmental Monitoring
    Prince, Peter
    Hill, Andrew
    Covarrubias, Evelyn Pina
    Doncaster, Patrick
    Snaddon, Jake L.
    Rogers, Alex
    SENSORS, 2019, 19 (03)
  • [8] TOSSIT: A low-cost, hand deployable, rope-less and acoustically silent mooring for underwater passive acoustic monitoring
    Zitterbart, Daniel P.
    Ochs, Miles
    Bonnel, Julien
    Bocconcelli, Alessandro
    HARDWAREX, 2022, 11
  • [9] CoralCam: A flexible, low-cost ecological monitoring platform
    Greene, Austin
    Forsman, Zac
    Toonen, Robert J.
    Donahue, Megan J.
    HARDWAREX, 2020, 7 (07):
  • [10] A low-cost small unmanned surface vehicle (sUSV) for very high-resolution mapping and monitoring of shallow marine habitats
    Raber, George T.
    Schill, Steven R.
    REMOTE SENSING OF THE OCEAN, SEA ICE, COASTAL WATERS, AND LARGE WATER REGIONS 2019, 2019, 11150