Informed consent and transesophageal echocardiography: A review of patient responses

被引:1
作者
Paterick, Timothy E. [1 ]
Paterick, Zachary R. [2 ]
Fletcher, Gerald [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Cardiovasc Dis, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
[2] Coll Holy Cross, Worcester, MA 01610 USA
关键词
Informed consent; Standards; Transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE); Risks; Doctrine of informed consent; Fiduciary duty; Documentation;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.02.046
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To identify whether our pre-procedure discussion of the risks of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) as well as documentation in the electronic medical record (EMR) met the standard of care for informed consent. Methods: Questionnaires were mailed to 500 patients who underwent a TEE at the Mayo Clinic Florida (MCF) requesting responses to questions that would identify how well the risks of the TEE procedure were discussed. Results: A positive response to the questions regarding the risks of TEE ranged from 75 to 95% and adequate documentation in the EMR revealed a 66% compliance rate. Conclusions: Individual physician and institutional commitment to informed consent at MCF is reflected in the very positive response to our questionnaire for meeting the criteria of informed consent; however, the documentation of the procedure discussion fell below the desired rate. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 229
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Informed consent in the management of OSAS patient: form proposal
    Zangari, Francesca
    DENTAL CADMOS, 2023, 91 (05) : 384 - 395
  • [32] Patient Perspective on Informed Consent In Surgery: A Qualitative Investigation
    Asmit, Mayank
    Kumar, Bhartendu
    Kibria, Tauseef
    Kibria, Sadaf
    JOURNAL OF PIONEERING MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 13 (01): : 111 - 115
  • [33] Argumentation and informed consent in the doctor-patient relationship
    Bickenbach, Jerome
    JOURNAL OF ARGUMENTATION IN CONTEXT, 2012, 1 (01) : 5 - 18
  • [34] Green bioethics, patient autonomy and informed consent in healthcare
    Resnik, David B.
    Pugh, Jonathan
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2024, 50 (07) : 489 - 493
  • [35] Medical research: Why trouble the patient for informed consent?
    Farnell, SM
    MEDICAL AND PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2002, 39 (03): : 207 - 209
  • [36] Research without informed patient consent in incompetent patients
    Dobb, G. J.
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2015, 43 (03) : 313 - 316
  • [37] Arguing ‘for’ the Patient: Informed Consent and Strategic Maneuvering in Doctor–Patient Interaction
    Peter J. Schulz
    Sara Rubinelli
    Argumentation, 2008, 22 : 423 - 432
  • [38] Respecting patient autonomy: Screening at CT and informed consent
    Earnest, F
    Swensen, SJ
    Zink, FE
    RADIOLOGY, 2003, 226 (03) : 633 - 634
  • [39] Interventions to Improve Patient Comprehension in Informed Consent for Medical and Surgical Procedures: An Updated Systematic Review
    Glaser, Johanna
    Nouri, Sarah
    Fernandez, Alicia
    Sudore, Rebecca L.
    Schillinger, Dean
    Klein-Fedyshin, Michele
    Schenker, Yael
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2020, 40 (02) : 119 - 143
  • [40] Psychiatrists' documentation of informed consent
    Schachter, D
    Kleinman, I
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 1998, 43 (10): : 1012 - 1017