Informed consent and transesophageal echocardiography: A review of patient responses

被引：1
|
作者：
Paterick, Timothy E. [1 ]
Paterick, Zachary R. [2 ]
Fletcher, Gerald [1 ]
机构：
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Cardiovasc Dis, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
[2] Coll Holy Cross, Worcester, MA 01610 USA
来源：
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY | 2010年 / 143卷 / 03期
关键词：
Informed consent; Standards; Transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE); Risks; Doctrine of informed consent; Fiduciary duty; Documentation;
D O I：
10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.02.046
中图分类号：
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号：
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要：
Objective: To identify whether our pre-procedure discussion of the risks of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) as well as documentation in the electronic medical record (EMR) met the standard of care for informed consent. Methods: Questionnaires were mailed to 500 patients who underwent a TEE at the Mayo Clinic Florida (MCF) requesting responses to questions that would identify how well the risks of the TEE procedure were discussed. Results: A positive response to the questions regarding the risks of TEE ranged from 75 to 95% and adequate documentation in the EMR revealed a 66% compliance rate. Conclusions: Individual physician and institutional commitment to informed consent at MCF is reflected in the very positive response to our questionnaire for meeting the criteria of informed consent; however, the documentation of the procedure discussion fell below the desired rate. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：227 / 229
页数：3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] It's Called "Informed Consent," But How "Informed" Are Patients? A Patient Perspective on Informed Consent in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Saudi Arabia
    Gray, Jenny L.
    Mrad, Iskandar C.
    Alayed, Aseel M.
    Alhawas, Fadwa A.
    Abdulhameed, Najlaa M. Faiq
    Mahomed, Zubeda B.
    Alwtaid, Mashail A.
    Hamdan, Abdullah A. Bany
    Alharbi, AlWaleed M.
    Alhasani, Mohammed
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY, 2025, 21 (02) : 89 - 94
  • [22] Interventions to Improve Patient Comprehension in Informed Consent for Medical and Surgical Procedures: A Systematic Review
    Schenker, Yael
    Fernandez, Alicia
    Sudore, Rebecca
    Schillinger, Dean
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2011, 31 (01) : 151 - 173
  • [23] Informed consent for medical treatment and research: A review
    del Carmen, MG
    Joffe, S
    ONCOLOGIST, 2005, 10 (08) : 636 - 641
  • [24] FOCUSED REVIEW Informed Consent in Obstetric Anesthesia
    Broaddus, Brain M.
    Chandrasekhar, Shobana
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2011, 112 (04) : 912 - 915
  • [25] Surgical informed consent in children: a systematic review
    Chotai, Pranit N.
    Nollan, Richard
    Huang, Eunice Y.
    Gosain, Ankush
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 213 : 191 - 198
  • [26] Patient accrual and understanding of informed consent in a two-stage consent design
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Vertosick, Emily A.
    Carlsson, Sigrid, V
    Ehdaie, Behfar
    Kim, Scott Y. H.
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2021, 18 (03) : 377 - 382
  • [27] Who is the Patient? Disclosure of Information and Consent in Anesthesia and Intensive Care (Informed Consent)
    Korusic, Andelko
    Merc, Vlasta
    Duzel, Viktor
    Tudoric-Djeno, Ivana
    Zidak, Davorka
    Brundula, Ana
    Sojcic, Natasa
    Milanovic, Rudolf
    Baric, Ada
    Beslic, Gabrijela
    COLLEGIUM ANTROPOLOGICUM, 2013, 37 (03) : 1033 - 1038
  • [28] Nocebo, informed consent and doctor-patient communication
    Hansen, E.
    Zech, N.
    Benson, S.
    NERVENARZT, 2020, 91 (08): : 691 - 699
  • [29] Informed Consent During Labour: Patient and Physician Perspectives
    Smith, Martha K.
    Levy, Karen S.
    Yudin, Mark H.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2018, 40 (05) : 614 - 617
  • [30] Informed consent in endoscopic sinus surgery: The patient perspective
    Wolf, JS
    Chiu, AG
    Palmer, JN
    O'Malley, BW
    Schofield, K
    Taylor, RJ
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2005, 115 (03) : 492 - 494
12345