Dexmedetomidine is safe and reduces the additional dose of midazolam for sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in very elderly patients

被引:39
作者
Inatomi, Osamu [1 ]
Imai, Takayuki [1 ]
Fujimoto, Takehide [1 ]
Takahashi, Kenichiro [1 ]
Yokota, Yoshihiro [1 ]
Yamashita, Noriaki [1 ]
Hasegawa, Hiroshi [1 ]
Nishida, Atsushi [1 ]
Bamba, Shigeki [2 ]
Sugimoto, Mitsushige [3 ]
Andoh, Akira [1 ]
机构
[1] Shiga Univ Med Sci, Div Gastroenterol, Dept Med, Seta Tsukinowa Cho, Otsu, Shiga 5202192, Japan
[2] Shiga Univ Med Sci, Div Clin Nutr, Dept Med, Otsu, Shiga, Japan
[3] Shiga Univ Med Sci Hosp, Div Digest Endoscopy, Otsu, Shiga, Japan
关键词
Midazolam; Dexmedetomidine; Cholangiopancreatography; Endoscopic; PROPOFOL-BASED SEDATION; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; DEEP SEDATION; ERCP; METAANALYSIS; MEPERIDINE;
D O I
10.1186/s12876-018-0897-5
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) often requires deep sedation. Dexmedetomidine, a highly selective 2-adrenoceptor agonist with sedative activity and minimal effects on respiration, has recently been widely used among patients in the intensive care unit. However, its use in endoscopic procedures in very elderly patients is unclear. In this study, we retrospectively investigated the safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine sedation during ERCP.MethodsThe study included 62 very elderly patients (aged over 80years) who underwent ERCP from January 2014, with sedation involving dexmedetomidine (i.v. infusion at 3.0g/kg/h over 10min followed by continuous infusion at 0.4g/kg/h) along with midazolam. For comparison, the study included 78 patients who underwent ERCP before January 2014, with midazolam alone. We considered additional administration of midazolam as needed to maintain a sedation level of 3-4, according to the Ramsay sedation scale. The outcome measures were amount of midazolam, adverse events associated with sedation, and hemodynamics.ResultsThe incidence of decreased SpO(2) and median dose of additional midazolam were significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group than in the conventional group. The minimum systolic blood pressure and minimum heart rate during and after examination was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group than in the conventional group. However, serious acute heart failure or arrhythmia was not noted.ConclusionsDexmedetomidine can decrease the incidence of respiratory complications and the total dose of other sedative agents. It can be used as an alternative to conventional methods with midazolam for adequate sedation during ERCP in very elderly patients.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[11]   Effect of the midazolam added with propofol-based sedation in esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A randomized trial [J].
Kim, Eun Hye ;
Park, Jun Chul ;
Shin, Sung Kwan ;
Lee, Yong Chan ;
Lee, Sang Kil .
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 33 (04) :894-899
[12]   LACK OF UNIFORMITY IN EVALUATION OF ENDOSCOPIC PROGNOSTIC FEATURES OF BLEEDING ULCERS [J].
LAINE, L ;
FREEMAN, M ;
COHEN, H .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1994, 40 (04) :411-417
[13]   Midazolam with meperidine and dexmedetomidine vs. midazolam with meperidine for sedation during ERCP: prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial [J].
Lee, Ban Seok ;
Ryu, Junghee ;
Lee, Sang Hyub ;
Lee, Min Geun ;
Jang, Sang Eon ;
Hwang, Jin-Hyeok ;
Ryu, Ji Kon ;
Do, Sang-Hwan ;
Kim, Yong-Tae .
ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 46 (04) :291-297
[14]   Dexmedetomidine impairs success of patient-controlled sedation in alcoholics during ERCP: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study [J].
Mazanikov, Max ;
Udd, Marianne ;
Kylanpaa, Leena ;
Mustonen, Harri ;
Lindstrom, Outi ;
Halttunen, Jorma ;
Poyhia, Reino .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (06) :2163-2168
[15]   A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials of moderate sedation for routine endoscopic procedures [J].
McQuaid, Kenneth R. ;
Laine, Loren .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 67 (06) :910-923
[16]   Clinical efficacy of dexmedetomidine alone is less than propofol for conscious sedation during ERCP [J].
Muller, Suzana ;
Borowics, Silvia M. ;
Fortis, Elaine A. F. ;
Stefani, Luciana C. ;
Soares, Gabriela ;
Maguilnik, Ismael ;
Breyer, Helenice P. ;
Hidalgo, Maria Paz L. ;
Caumo, Wolnei .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 67 (04) :651-659
[17]   Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for gastrointestinal endoscopy: A meta-analysis [J].
Nishizawa, Toshihiro ;
Suzuki, Hidekazu ;
Sagara, Seiji ;
Kanai, Takanori ;
Yahagi, Naohisa .
DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 27 (01) :8-15
[18]   Feasibility of deep sedation with a combination of propofol and dexmedetomidine hydrochloride for esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection [J].
Nonaka, Takashi ;
Inamori, Masahiko ;
Miyashita, Tetsuya ;
Harada, Shinsuke ;
Inoh, Yumi ;
Kanoshima, Kenji ;
Matsuura, Mizue ;
Higurashi, Takuma ;
Ohkubo, Hidenori ;
Iida, Hiroshi ;
Endo, Hiroki ;
Kusakabe, Akihiko ;
Maeda, Shin ;
Gotoh, Takahisa ;
Nakajima, Atsushi .
DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 28 (02) :145-151
[19]   Deep sedation occurs frequently during elective endoscopy with meperidine and midazolam [J].
Patel, S ;
Vargo, JJ ;
Khandwala, F ;
Lopez, R ;
Trolli, P ;
Dumot, JA ;
Conwell, DL ;
Zuccaro, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 100 (12) :2689-2695
[20]   Non-anaesthesiologists should not be allowed to administer propofol for procedural sedation: a Consensus Statement of 21 European National Societies of Anaesthesia [J].
Perel, Azriel .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2011, 28 (08) :580-584