Pulsed Field Ablation of Superior Vena Cava: Feasibility and Safety of Pulsed Field Ablation

被引:14
|
作者
Zhu, Tongjian [1 ]
Wang, Zhen [1 ]
Wang, Songyun [1 ]
Shi, Tiancai [2 ]
Zhu, Xiaolin [2 ]
Ma, Kezhong [3 ]
Wang, Zhuo [1 ]
Gao, Jinnian [2 ]
Jiang, Hong [1 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Renmin Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Jinjiang Elect Technol Co Ltd, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Hubei Univ Arts & Sci, Affiliated Hosp, Xiangyang Cent Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Xiangyang, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE | 2021年 / 8卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
pulsed field ablation; superior vena cava; arrhythmias; phrenic palsy; sinus node injury; ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; CATHETER ABLATION; ELECTRICAL ISOLATION; INJURY;
D O I
10.3389/fcvm.2021.698716
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Studies have shown that pulsed field ablation (PFA) has excellent effectiveness and safety in pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). However, there are few reports about the application of PFA, especially the alternating current (AC) biphase PFA, in superior vena cava (SVC) isolation, and its effectiveness and safety are still unclear. Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of the AC biphase PFA for SVC isolation, and to provide evidence for the clinical use of PFA for SVC. Methods: Eight pigs and two dogs were included in the study. PFA was delivered to these pigs and dogs. Pacing threshold and electrogram data were recorded before and after PFA. Voltage mapping of SCV was obtained before, after, and 3 weeks after PFA. At the end, all animals were euthanatized for gross pathology analysis. Results: For eight pigs, the median pacing threshold was 1.5 (1.4, 2.75) mA before PFA, while > 6.0 mA after PFA for all animals. The average electrogram amplitude reduction was 61.33 +/- 24.90% for ablations with the initial amplitude >= 0.5 mv. For two dogs, pacing threshold change and electrogram amplitude reduction were also observed. No phrenic palsy or sinus node injury was observed during PFA in any animal. Furthermore, voltage mapping showed that the voltage amplitude was significantly decreased in all animals and this could be kept for more than 3 weeks. Moreover, transmural tissue damage with reserved vessel and nerve were shown, no SVC stenosis was found at 3 weeks after PFA. Conclusion: PFA can effectively isolate SVC. Transmural tissue damage of SVC can be achieved without phrenic palsy, sinus node injury nor SVC stenosis.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation: Moving the field forward?
    Mekary, Wissam
    Merchant, Faisal M.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 34 (10) : 2027 - 2028
  • [42] Cardiac selectivity in pulsed field ablation
    Meng, Fanchao
    Jin, Shuqi
    Liu, Nian
    CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2025, 40 (01) : 37 - 41
  • [43] Coronary artery injury in pulsed field ablation
    Higuchi, Satoshi
    Gerstenfeld, Edward P.
    CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2025, 40 (01) : 22 - 30
  • [44] Circular Multielectrode Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter Lasso Pulsed Field Ablation Lesion Characteristics, Durability, and Effect on Neighboring Structures
    Yavin, Hagai
    Brem, Erez
    Zilberman, Israel
    Shapira-Daniels, Ayelet
    Datta, Keshava
    Govari, Assaf
    Altmann, Andres
    Anic, Ante
    Wazni, Oussama
    Anter, Elad
    CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 14 (02) : 157 - 165
  • [45] Pulsed field ablation in atrial fibrillation ablation: where are we and where are we going?
    Schiavone, Marco
    Tondo, Claudio
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2025, 27 : i167 - i170
  • [46] Pulsed field ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: Preclinical safety and effectiveness of a novel hexaspline ablation catheter
    Yu, Fengyuan
    Dong, Xiaonan
    Ding, Lei
    Reddy, Vivek
    Tang, Min
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 34 (11) : 2195 - 2202
  • [47] Pulsed field ablation and cryoballoon ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: insights on efficacy, safety and cardiac function
    Rattka, Manuel
    Mavrakis, Evangelos
    Vlachopoulou, Dimitra
    Rudolph, Isabel
    Kohn, Christina
    Bohnen, Jan
    Yahsaly, Loubna
    Siebermair, Johannes
    Wakili, Reza
    Jungen, Christiane
    Rassaf, Tienush
    Mathew, Shibu
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 67 (05) : 1191 - 1198
  • [48] Pulsed Field Ablation to Treat Atrial Fibrillation: A Review of the Literature
    Di Monaco, Antonio
    Vitulano, Nicola
    Troisi, Federica
    Quadrini, Federico
    Romanazzi, Imma
    Calvi, Valeria
    Grimaldi, Massimo
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR DEVELOPMENT AND DISEASE, 2022, 9 (04)
  • [49] Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Mechanisms, Advantages, and Limitations
    Jiang, Shali
    Qian, Frank
    Ji, Shuting
    Li, Luohong
    Liu, Qiming
    Zhou, Shenghua
    Xiao, Yichao
    REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2024, 25 (04)
  • [50] Radiofrequency and Pulsed Field Ablation Keeping Your Options Open
    Haines, David E.
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 9 (08) : 1802 - 1803