Pulsed Field Ablation of Superior Vena Cava: Feasibility and Safety of Pulsed Field Ablation

被引:14
|
作者
Zhu, Tongjian [1 ]
Wang, Zhen [1 ]
Wang, Songyun [1 ]
Shi, Tiancai [2 ]
Zhu, Xiaolin [2 ]
Ma, Kezhong [3 ]
Wang, Zhuo [1 ]
Gao, Jinnian [2 ]
Jiang, Hong [1 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Renmin Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Jinjiang Elect Technol Co Ltd, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Hubei Univ Arts & Sci, Affiliated Hosp, Xiangyang Cent Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Xiangyang, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE | 2021年 / 8卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
pulsed field ablation; superior vena cava; arrhythmias; phrenic palsy; sinus node injury; ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; CATHETER ABLATION; ELECTRICAL ISOLATION; INJURY;
D O I
10.3389/fcvm.2021.698716
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Studies have shown that pulsed field ablation (PFA) has excellent effectiveness and safety in pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). However, there are few reports about the application of PFA, especially the alternating current (AC) biphase PFA, in superior vena cava (SVC) isolation, and its effectiveness and safety are still unclear. Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of the AC biphase PFA for SVC isolation, and to provide evidence for the clinical use of PFA for SVC. Methods: Eight pigs and two dogs were included in the study. PFA was delivered to these pigs and dogs. Pacing threshold and electrogram data were recorded before and after PFA. Voltage mapping of SCV was obtained before, after, and 3 weeks after PFA. At the end, all animals were euthanatized for gross pathology analysis. Results: For eight pigs, the median pacing threshold was 1.5 (1.4, 2.75) mA before PFA, while > 6.0 mA after PFA for all animals. The average electrogram amplitude reduction was 61.33 +/- 24.90% for ablations with the initial amplitude >= 0.5 mv. For two dogs, pacing threshold change and electrogram amplitude reduction were also observed. No phrenic palsy or sinus node injury was observed during PFA in any animal. Furthermore, voltage mapping showed that the voltage amplitude was significantly decreased in all animals and this could be kept for more than 3 weeks. Moreover, transmural tissue damage with reserved vessel and nerve were shown, no SVC stenosis was found at 3 weeks after PFA. Conclusion: PFA can effectively isolate SVC. Transmural tissue damage of SVC can be achieved without phrenic palsy, sinus node injury nor SVC stenosis.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Superior vena cava isolation using a pentaspline pulsed-field ablation catheter: feasibility and safety in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation
    Ollitrault, Pierre
    Chaumont, Corentin
    Font, Jonaz
    Manninger, Martin
    Conti, Sergio
    Matusik, Pawel T.
    Mulder, Bart A.
    Ferchaud, Virginie
    Pellissier, Arnaud
    Al Khoury, Mayane
    Milliez, Paul
    Champ-Rigot, Laure
    Anselme, Frederic
    EUROPACE, 2024, 26 (07):
  • [2] Pulsed field ablation of superior vena cava in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a case report
    Tao, Yirao
    Zhou, Yang
    Sun, Xuerong
    Liao, Wenkai
    Wang, Yanjiang
    Shi, Liang
    Liu, Xingpeng
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [3] Superior vena cava isolation with pulsed field ablation in the presence of defibrillator leads
    Tsiachris, Dimitrios
    Doundoulakis, Ioannis
    Kordalis, Athanasios
    Antoniou, Christos-Konstantinos
    Tsioufis, Konstantinos
    JOURNAL OF ARRHYTHMIA, 2023, 39 (03) : 483 - 485
  • [4] Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation With Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava and Heterotaxy Syndrome
    Romero, Jorge E.
    Miranda-Arboleda, Andres F.
    Gabr, Mohamed
    Oliveira, Kyleigh K.
    Sauer, William H.
    Tedrow, Usha B.
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2025, 11 (03) : 650 - 654
  • [5] Pulsed field ablation of a focal atrial tachycardia from the superior vena cava in proximity to the phrenic nerve: a case report
    Tampakis, Konstantinos
    Papakonstantinou, Evangelia-Erasmia
    Sykiotis, Alexandros
    Pastromas, Sokratis
    Andrikopoulos, George
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CASE REPORTS, 2025, 9 (02)
  • [6] Pulsed Field Ablation: A Comprehensive Update
    Ezzeddine, Fatima M.
    Asirvatham, Samuel J.
    Nguyen, Duy T.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (17)
  • [7] Comparison of the Feasibility and Safety of a Deep Sedation Protocol for Pulmonary Vein Isolation With Pulsed Field Ablation, Cryoballoon Ablation, and Radiofrequency Ablation
    Galuszka, Oskar Marian
    Kueffer, Thomas
    Madaffari, Antonio
    Kozhuharov, Nikola
    Thalmann, Gregor
    Servatius, Helge
    Haeberlin, Andreas
    Noti, Fabian
    Tanner, Hildegard
    Roten, Laurent
    Reichlin, Tobias
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2024, 13 (11):
  • [8] Safety and Feasibility of Pulsed-Field Ablation in Patients With Mechanical Prosthetic Valves
    Scacciavillani, Roberto
    Rocca, Domenico G. Della
    Nair, Devi
    Magnocavallo, Michele
    Glowniak, Andrzej
    Mohanty, Sanghamitra
    Sorgente, Antonio
    Mene, Roberto
    Almorad, Alexandre
    Vetta, Giampaolo
    Pannone, Luigi
    Wojewoda, Katarzyna
    Marcon, Lorenzo
    Stroker, Erwin
    Bala, Gezim
    Konopka, Aleksander
    Sieira, Juan
    Bianchi, Stefano
    Gabrah, Kirollos
    Rossi, Pietro
    Sarkozy, Andrea
    Boveda, Serge
    Natale, Andrea
    de Asmundis, Carlo
    Chierchia, Gian-Battista
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2025, 11 (01) : 98 - 106
  • [9] Considerations regarding safety with pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation
    Sugrue, Alan
    Shabtaie, Samuel
    Tan, Nicholas Y.
    Maor, Elad
    Kapa, Suraj
    Asirvatham, Samuel J.
    HEART RHYTHM O2, 2024, 5 (09): : 655 - 661
  • [10] Pearls and Pitfalls of Pulsed Field Ablation
    Hartl, Stefan
    Reinsch, Nico
    Fueting, Anna
    Neven, Kars
    KOREAN CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2023, 53 (05) : 273 - 293