Eligibility and accessibility of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) for the treatment of uterine leiomyomas

被引:30
作者
Behera, Millie A. [1 ]
Leong, Madeline [1 ]
Johnson, Lauren [1 ]
Brown, Haywood [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Durham, NC 27713 USA
关键词
Leiomyoma; minimally invasive; MRI-guided focused ultrasound; thermablation; fibroids; ARTERY EMBOLIZATION; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; SURGERY; MANAGEMENT; PREGNANCY; HYSTERECTOMY; MYOMECTOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.09.063
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate patient eligibility and accessibility of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) for women with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas who desire conservative therapy. Design: Retrospective analysis of 169 patients referred for minimally invasive treatment of leiomyomas between November 2007 and February 2009. Clinical eligibility for MRgFUS was determined by Food and Drug Administration- based treatment guidelines. All patients underwent pretreatment pelvic imaging to determine candidacy for the procedure. Patient(s): Premenopausal women with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas. Setting: Academic medical center. Main Outcome Measure(s): Eligibility for MRgFUS based on clinical and anatomic patient criteria. Result(s): Forty-seven percent of patients (80/169) were determined clinically eligible for the procedure. Of these, 16% of patients (27/169) were found to be eligible for MRgFUS based on imaging results. Overall, the main reasons for ineligibility were very large leiomyomas (8%; 14/169), cost (12%; 21/169), and desired fertility (14%; 23/169). An additional 48% of patients declined MRgFUS for unstated reasons, often after obtaining financial and insurance coverage information. Conclusion(s): Currently, many women with leiomyomas are unable to obtain MRgFUS treatment for multiple reasons, including uterine size, desire for fertility, and, most commonly, financial limitations. With increasing clinical experience, further research, and broadened insurance coverage, it may be possible to increase accessibility and expand eligibility criteria for this minimally invasive therapy. (Fertil Steril (R) 2010; 94: 1864-8. (C) 2010 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:1864 / 1868
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Randomized study of laparoscopic versus minitaparotomic myomectomy for uterine myomas
    Alessandri, F
    Lijoi, D
    Mistrangelo, E
    Ferrero, S
    Ragni, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 13 (02) : 92 - 97
  • [2] ATHANASOULIS C A, 1976, Gynecologic Oncology, V4, P144, DOI 10.1016/0090-8258(76)90056-1
  • [3] CARLSON KJ, 1993, NEW ENGL J MED, V328, P856
  • [4] DAYBAIRD D, 2003, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V188, P100
  • [5] Payer costs in patients undergoing uterine artery embolization, hysterectomy, or myomectomy for treatment of uterine fibroids
    Dembek, Carole J.
    Pelletier, Elise M.
    Isaacson, Keith B.
    Spies, James B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2007, 18 (10) : 1207 - 1213
  • [6] Uterine Artery Embolization and Infertility
    Domenico, Louis, Jr.
    Siskin, Gary P.
    [J]. TECHNIQUES IN VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2006, 9 (01) : 7 - 11
  • [7] Successful term pregnancy following MR-guided focused ultrasound treatment of uterine leiomyoma
    Gavrilova-Jordon, L. P.
    Rose, C. H.
    Traynor, K. D.
    Brost, B. C.
    Gostout, B. s
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2007, 27 (01) : 59 - 61
  • [8] Focused ultrasound surgery of intramural leiomyomas may facilitate fertility: A case report
    Hanstede, Miriam M. F.
    Tempany, Clare M. C.
    Stewart, Elizabeth A.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2007, 88 (02) : 497.e5 - 497.e7
  • [9] Embolotherapy for myoma-induced menorrhagia
    Hutchins, FL
    Worthlngton-Kirsch, R
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2000, 27 (02) : 397 - +
  • [10] Management of symptomatic fibroids: conservative surgical treatment modalities other than abdominal or laparoscopic myomectomy
    Istre, Olav
    [J]. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2008, 22 (04) : 735 - 747