Transvenous low energy internal cardioversion for atrial fibrillation: A review of clinical applications and future developments

被引:22
作者
Boriani, G
Biffi, M
Camanini, C
Luceri, RM
Branzi, A
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Inst Cardiol, Bologna, Italy
[2] Florida Arrhythmia Consultants, Ft Lauderdale, FL USA
来源
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY | 2001年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
atrial fibrillation; cardioversion; defibrillation; defibrillation threshold; electrophysiological study;
D O I
10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.00099.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Low energy internal atrial cardioversion can be performed by delivering biphasic shocks between transvenous catheters positioned within the cardiac chambers or great vessels. Delivery of shocks results in effective cardioversion at energies < 6-10 J and the procedure can be effective even when external cardioversion has failed. Shock induced discomfort varies from patient to patient, but the procedure can be usually performed without general anesthesia and eventually under mild sedation. Nevertheless, tolerability has to be improved by obtaining a substantial reduction in defibrillating thresholds. With regard to safety, delivery of shocks for defibrillating the atria implies a potential risk of inducing ventricular fibrillation; to minimize this risk, shock delivery must be synchronous to the QRS and should be avoided during rapid RR cycles (< 300 ms). Presently, transvenous low energy cardioversion is an investigational procedure, but a widening of indications is expected in the near future. The cost of the procedure, which remains invasive and requires a brief hospital stay must be balanced with the benefit of restoring sinus rhythm and the possibility of maintaining sinus rhythm for the medium- to long-term. Experimental and clinical investigations of low energy internal cardioversion have resulted in the development of devices for atrial defibrillation whose clinical role and cost-benefit ratio is currently under evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 107
页数:9
相关论文
共 103 条
[1]  
ACCORTI PR, 1994, IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVE, P179
[2]   LEAD SYSTEMS FOR ATRIAL DEFIBRILLATION [J].
ALFERNESS, C ;
AYERS, GM ;
COOPER, RAS ;
IDEKER, RE .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 17 (05) :1043-1047
[3]  
Alt E, 1997, EUR HEART J, V18, P1796
[4]   Efficacy of a new balloon catheter for internal cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation without anaesthesia [J].
Alt, E ;
Ammer, R ;
Lehmann, G ;
Schmitt, C ;
Pasquantonio, J ;
Schömig, A .
HEART, 1998, 79 (02) :128-132
[5]   Effect of electrode position on outcome of low-energy intracardiac cardioversion of atrial fibrillation [J].
Alt, E ;
Schmitt, C ;
Ammer, R ;
Plewan, A ;
Evans, F ;
Pasquantonio, J ;
Ideker, T ;
Lehmann, G ;
Putter, K ;
Schomig, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 79 (05) :621-625
[6]  
AMMER R, 1996, PACE 2, V19, P230
[7]   VENTRICULAR PROARRHYTHMIC EFFECTS OF VENTRICULAR CYCLE LENGTH AND SHOCK STRENGTH IN A SHEEP MODEL OF TRANSVENOUS ATRIAL DEFIBRILLATION [J].
AYERS, GM ;
ALFERNESS, CA ;
ILINA, M ;
WAGNER, DO ;
SIROKMAN, WA ;
ADAMS, JM ;
GRIFFIN, JC .
CIRCULATION, 1994, 89 (01) :413-422
[8]  
BAILIN SJ, 1999, PACE, V22, P871
[9]   Ventricular fibrillation resulting from synchronized internal atrial defibrillation in a patient with ventricular preexcitation [J].
Barold, HS ;
Wharton, JM .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 8 (04) :436-440
[10]  
BIALY D, 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, V19, p41A