Expert knowledge, communication and government in pandemics

被引:1
|
作者
Silvet, Laurencia [1 ]
Llanos Paz, Ramiro [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Argentina, Inst Multidisciplinar Salud Tecnol & Desarrollo, Bahia Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[2] Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn, Inst Estudios el Desarrollo Social, UNSE, FHCSyS, San Miguel De Tucuman, Argentina
来源
QUESTION | 2022年 / 3卷 / 71期
关键词
expert knowledge; pandemics; digital newspapers;
D O I
10.24215/16696581e682
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This paper analyzes the discourses produced in two digital newspapers about the link between expert knowledge and the State during the first year of the coronavirus pandemic in Argentina. It explores the treatment that the media constructed about the configuration of technical-political elites, the discourses that are legitimized by them and the disputes and tensions present in this process. It focuses on contents, sources, actors and assessment. The data are elaborated on the basis of discourse analysis, taking into account the complex relationships between the text (structures of journalistic discourse) and its context of production (socio-historical conditions). The results obtained point out the importance of the presence of the role of expert knowledge in the media, as an element that guides the discussion and provides legitimacy to the communication of the measures taken during the pandemic, the focus of the discussion around the measures and the tensions that emerge in it with respect to the expert knowledge protagonists and the reproduction of the biomedical model. Finally, the need for comprehensive responses in strategies that take into account the psychosocial-economic dimension and the social particularities of the scenarios to which they are oriented is discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Expert or experiential knowledge? How knowledge informs situated action in childcare practices
    Tian, Xiaoli
    Zhang, Sai
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2022, 307
  • [22] The political functions of expert knowledge: knowledge and legitimation in European Union immigration policy
    Boswell, Christina
    JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2008, 15 (04) : 471 - 488
  • [23] ELICITATION AND MODELING OF EXPERT KNOWLEDGE AS BASIS FOR BUILDING OF EXPERT-SYSTEMS .2. ANALYSIS
    ROTHE, HJ
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHOLOGIE, 1994, 202 (04): : 321 - 348
  • [24] Collaborative writing applications in support of knowledge translation and management during pandemics: A scoping review
    Abasse, Kassim Said
    Toulouse-Fournier, Annie
    Paquet, Catherine
    Cote, Andre
    Smith, Pascal Y.
    Bergeron, Frederic
    Archambault, Patrick
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2022, 165
  • [25] Expert knowledge and Supervised learning of rules: Application to Echinoderms
    Ben Nasr, Ines
    Borgi, Amel
    Sellem, Feriel
    2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL, DECISION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES (CODIT), 2013, : 300 - 305
  • [26] Expert Economic Knowledge and Practices in Early Modern Russia
    Dadykina, Margarita
    ISTORIYA-ELEKTRONNYI NAUCHNO-OBRAZOVATELNYI ZHURNAL, 2024, 15 (07):
  • [27] Voluntary standards, expert knowledge and the governance of sustainability networks
    Ponte, Stefano
    Cheyns, Emmanuelle
    GLOBAL NETWORKS-A JOURNAL OF TRANSNATIONAL AFFAIRS, 2013, 13 (04): : 459 - 477
  • [28] An Ontological Approach To Identify Expert Knowledge In Academic Institution
    Kalaiselvi, K.
    Balamurugan, P. S.
    2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CURRENT TRENDS IN ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (ICCTET), 2013, : 120 - 122
  • [29] Expert knowledge use and deliberation in local policy making
    Lundin, Martin
    Oberg, PerOla
    POLICY SCIENCES, 2014, 47 (01) : 25 - 49
  • [30] Using expert knowledge in solving the seismic inverse problem
    Averill, Matthew G.
    Miller, Kate C.
    Keller, G. Randy
    Kreinovich, Vladik
    Aralza, Roberto
    Starks, Scott A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2007, 45 (03) : 564 - 587