Neural correlates of proactive and reactive motor response inhibition of gambling stimuli in frequent gamblers

被引:15
作者
Brevers, D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
He, Q. [4 ]
Keller, B. [1 ,2 ]
Noel, X. [3 ]
Bechara, A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Psychol, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Brain & Creat Inst, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[3] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Psychol Med Lab, Fac Med, Brugmann Campus, Brussels, Belgium
[4] Southwest Univ, Fac Psychol, 2 Tiansheng Rd, Chongqing, Peoples R China
关键词
ALCOHOL-RELATED STIMULI; INFERIOR FRONTAL GYRUS; ATTENTIONAL BIAS; STOP-SIGNAL; COGNITIVE CONTROL; SELF-CONTROL; BRAIN; AVAILABILITY; CUES; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-017-07786-5
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine whether motivational-salient cues could exert a differential impact on proactive (the restrain of actions in preparation for stopping) and reactive (outright stopping) inhibition. Fourteen high-frequency poker players, and 14 matched non-gambler controls, performed a modified version of the stop-signal paradigm, which required participants to inhibit categorization of poker or neutral pictures. The probability that a stop-signal occurs (0%, 17%, 25%, 33%) was manipulated across blocks of trials, as indicated by the color of the computer screen. Behavioral analyses revealed that poker players were faster than controls in categorizing pictures across all levels of proactive motor response inhibition (go trials). Brain imaging analyses highlighted higher dorsal anterior cingulate cortex activation in poker players, as compared to controls, during reactive inhibition. These findings suggest that, due to their faster rates of stimulus discrimination, poker players might have recruited more cognitive resources than controls when required to stop their response (reactive inhibition). Nevertheless, no main effect of stimulus type was found, on either proactive or reactive inhibition. Additional studies are, therefore, needed in order to confirm that investigating the dynamics between reactive and proactive inhibition offers a discriminative analysis of inhibitory control toward motivational-salient cues.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]  
Andersson J. L. R., 2007, TR07JA2 FMRIB, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2008.10.055
[2]  
Andersson JLR, 2007, Non-linear optimisation (FMRIB Technical Report TR07JA1)
[3]   From Reactive to Proactive and Selective Control: Developing a Richer Model for Stopping Inappropriate Responses [J].
Aron, Adam R. .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 69 (12) :E55-E68
[4]   Inhibition and impulsivity: Behavioral and neural basis of response control [J].
Bari, Andrea ;
Robbins, Trevor W. .
PROGRESS IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2013, 108 :44-79
[5]   Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? [J].
Baumeister, RF ;
Bratslavsky, E ;
Muraven, M ;
Tice, DM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 74 (05) :1252-1265
[6]   The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision [J].
Bechara, A ;
Damasio, AR .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2005, 52 (02) :336-372
[7]   Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy [J].
Bechara, A ;
Damasio, H ;
Tranel, D ;
Damasio, AR .
SCIENCE, 1997, 275 (5304) :1293-1295
[8]   General multilevel linear modeling for group analysis in FMRI [J].
Beckmann, CF ;
Jenkinson, M ;
Smith, SM .
NEUROIMAGE, 2003, 20 (02) :1052-1063
[9]   To eat or not to eat: Effects of food availability on reward system activity during food picture viewing [J].
Blechert, Jens ;
Klackl, Johannes ;
Miedl, Stephan F. ;
Wilhelm, Frank H. .
APPETITE, 2016, 99 :254-261
[10]   The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework [J].
Braver, Todd S. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2012, 16 (02) :106-113