How to Find God in the Dutch Golden Age

被引:2
作者
Bussels, Stijn [1 ]
Van Oostveldt, Bram [2 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
DUTCH CROSSING-JOURNAL OF LOW COUNTRIES STUDIES | 2017年 / 41卷 / 03期
关键词
Vondel; catharsis; Biblical tragedy; modernity;
D O I
10.1080/03096564.2016.1250449
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
In the 1654 tragedy Lucifer Joost van den Vondel shows how the titular character revolts against God because he cannot fathom His plans. Vondel presents Lucifer as an identifiable character within the format of the tragedy. Hence, the poet breaks with the long-standing tradition of representing the character as completely baleful and depraved. Even though this tragedy is one of the most discussed works in Dutch literary history, the question why Vondel chose Lucifer as the leading character for a tragedy remains unanswered. To contextualize Vondel's choice, this article first discusses an interpretation of Aristotle's concept of catharsis from the author's milieu. Leiden humanist Daniel Heinsius uses this concept to point out how problems with which a tragedy deeply confronts its audience realize an emotional habituation and enforce the correct handling of similar problems in the world outside the theatre. Likewise, with the representation of Lucifer's harrowing doubts concerning God's plans, Vondel wanted to teach his audience how to deal with their own problems with divine inscrutability. By presenting and even magnifying the doubts about God in the tragedy, the theatre-maker wanted to purify the audience from these doubts. The genesis of the devil is the ideal subject matter for a tragedy to reinforce the audience's faith.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 209
页数:15
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Bloemendal J., Bibliography of Vondels Dramas (1850–2010),’, Joost Van Den Vondel (1587–1679), pp. 564-567, (2012)
  • [2] Jonckbloet W.J.A., Vondels Lucifer eene politieke allegorie’, Overijsselschen Almanak, 15, pp. 295-343, (1850)
  • [3] Dijkhuizen J.F.V., Helmers H., Vondel’s Lucifer In: ‘Religion and Politics.
  • [4] Dutch Playwright in the Golden Age, pp. 377-405, (2012)
  • [5] Kazemier G., Lucifer to Protestantism in ‘Vondel’s Lucifer en Luther’, Vondel-Kroniek, 7, pp. 49-65, (1936)
  • [6] Tijdschrift Voor Nederlandse Taal- En Letterkunde, 67, pp. 81-102, (1950)
  • [7] Peter K., King who analyses Lucifer and concludes that the play is a failed theological theatre piece, ‘Vondel’s Lucifer: Een mislukt theologisch toneelstuk’, Sonja Witstein and Eddy Grootes, pp. 218-235, (1979)
  • [8] Smit W.A.P., Van Pascha Tot Noach. Deel 2: Salomon – Koning Edipus, pp. 54-180, (1970)
  • [9] Langvik-Johannessen K., Zwischen Himmel Und Erde. Eine Studie über Joost Van Den Vondel’s Biblische Tragödie in Gattungsgeschichtlicher Perspektive, pp. 249-288, (1963)
  • [10] Korsten F.-W., Sovereignty as Inviolability. Vondel’s Theatrical Explorations in the Dutch Republic, pp. 175-180, (2009)