The risk and extent of neurologic events are equivalent for high-risk patients treated with transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement

被引:30
|
作者
Gleason, Thomas G. [1 ]
Schindler, John T. [1 ]
Adams, David H. [2 ]
Reardon, Michael J. [3 ]
Kleiman, Neal S. [3 ]
Caplan, Louis R. [4 ]
Conte, John V. [5 ]
Deeb, G. Michael [6 ]
Hughes, G. Chad, Jr. [7 ]
Chenoweth, Sharla [8 ]
Popma, Jeffrey J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Surg, New York, NY USA
[3] Houston Methodist Debakey Heart & Vasc Ctr, Houston, TX USA
[4] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[7] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[8] Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
aortic stenosis; surgical aortic valve replacement; transcatheter aortic valve replacement; neurologic outcomes; stroke; MINI-MENTAL-STATE; IMPLANTATION CLINICAL-TRIALS; END-POINT DEFINITIONS; CONSENSUS REPORT; STROKE; STENOSIS; CONSEQUENCES; OUTCOMES; SURGERY; TAVI;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.02.073
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: This study was designed to characterize the incidence of new clinically detectable neurologic events, or any comparative change in indices of higher cognitive function following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) within the framework of a prospective, randomized clinical trial for high-risk patients. Methods: High-risk patients (predicted SAVR mortality 15%) with severe aortic stenosis (n = 750) were randomized 1: 1 to TAVR or SAVR and underwent evaluation using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and modified Rankin Scale assessment at each follow-up and any suspected event. Neurologic outcomes were ascertained by a neurologist and further evaluated by Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), visual fields testing, gait assessment, hand function, writing evaluation, and drawing assessment. Results: The 30-day, 1-year, and 2-year stroke rates were 4.9%, 8.7%, and 10.9%, respectively, for TAVR and 6.2%, 12.5%, and 16.6%, respectively, for SAVR (P = .46, .11, and .05, respectively). All-cause mortality in patients with a major stroke was 83.3% for TAVR and 54.5% for SAVR at 2 years (P = .29). Late major stroke was disproportionately higher (23.8% at 2 years) among patients with poor iliofemoral access randomized to SAVR. Peripheral vascular disease and falls within 6 months predicted early stroke, and severe aortic calcification and high Charlson score (>= 5) predicted 1-year stroke post-TAVR. NIHSS and MMSE scores trended higher after SAVR than after TAVR. Lack of dual antiplatelet therapy use during and after TAVR was associated with early stroke. Conclusions: This study defines an equivalent postprocedural stroke risk, stroke extent, and degree of cognitive change after TAVR or SAVR in a high-risk population, and also defines several predictors of stroke after TAVR.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 95
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A hybrid approach for a case with a high risk of not only surgical but transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Mikami, Tsubasa
    Maeda, Koichi
    Nakamura, Daisuke
    Kainuma, Satoshi
    Mizote, Isamu
    Shimamura, Kazuo
    Toda, Koichi
    Sakata, Yasushi
    Kuratani, Toru
    Sawa, Yoshiki
    GENERAL THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 69 (12) : 1570 - 1574
  • [22] Cerebrovascular Events in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Review
    Patel, Kush P.
    Rathod, Krishnaraj S.
    Lansky, Alexandra J.
    Prendergast, Bernard
    Kharbanda, Rajesh K.
    Mathur, Anthony
    Perry, Richard
    Baumbach, Andreas
    STROKE, 2024, 55 (11) : 2754 - 2764
  • [23] Meta-analysis of transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low surgical risk
    Witberg, Guy
    Landes, Uri
    Lador, Adi
    Yahav, Dafna
    Kornowski, Ran
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2019, 15 (12) : E1047 - +
  • [24] Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Valve Replacement in Patients at High Risk for Surgery A Study of Echocardiographic Change and Risk Prediction
    Little, Stephen H.
    Oh, Jae K.
    Gillam, Linda
    Sengupta, Partho P.
    Orsinelli, David A.
    Cavalcante, Joao L.
    Chang, James D.
    Adams, David H.
    Zorn, George L., III
    Pollak, Amy W.
    Abdelmoneim, Sahar S.
    Reardon, Michael J.
    Qiao, Hongyan
    Popma, Jeffrey J.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2016, 9 (06)
  • [25] Redefining "low risk": Outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients in the transcatheter aortic valve replacement era
    Johnston, Douglas R.
    Mahboubi, Rashed
    Soltesz, Edward G.
    Artis, Amanda S.
    Roselli, Eric E.
    Blackstone, Eugene H.
    Svensson, Lars G.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 165 (02) : 591 - 602
  • [26] The Minimalist Approach for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in High-Risk Patients
    Dvir, Danny
    Jhaveri, Rajiv
    Pichard, Augusto D.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2012, 5 (05) : 468 - 469
  • [27] Comparison of transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography for transcatheter aortic valve replacement sizing in high-risk patients
    Fox, Henrik
    Hemmann, Katrin
    Lehmann, Ralf
    JOURNAL OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2020, 18 (01) : 47 - 56
  • [28] Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low to intermediate surgical risk: rationale and design of the randomised DEDICATE Trial
    Seiffert, Moritz
    Vonthein, Reinhard
    Baumgartner, Helmut
    Borger, Michael A.
    Choi, Yeong-Hoon
    Falk, Volkmar
    Frey, Norbert
    Hagendorff, Andreas
    Hagl, Christian
    Hamm, Christian
    Koenig, Inke R.
    Landmesser, Ulf
    Massberg, Steffen
    Reichenspurner, Hermann
    Thiele, Holger
    Twerenbold, Raphael
    Vens, Maren
    Walther, Thomas
    Ziegler, Andreas
    Cremer, Jochen
    Blankenberg, Stefan
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2023, 19 (08) : 652 - +
  • [29] Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients
    Reardon, M. J.
    Van Mieghem, N. M.
    Popma, J. J.
    Kleiman, N. S.
    Sondergaard, L.
    Mumtaz, M.
    Adams, D. H.
    Deeb, G. M.
    Maini, B.
    Gada, H.
    Chetcuti, S.
    Gleason, T.
    Heiser, J.
    Lange, R.
    Merhi, W.
    Oh, J. K.
    Olsen, P. S.
    Piazza, N.
    Williams, M.
    Windecker, S.
    Yakubov, S. J.
    Grube, E.
    Makkar, R.
    Lee, J. S.
    Conte, J.
    Vang, E.
    Nguyen, H.
    Chang, Y.
    Mugglin, A. S.
    Serruys, P. W. J. C.
    Kappetein, A. P.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 376 (14) : 1321 - 1331
  • [30] Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Compared With Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients
    Rosato, Stefano
    Santini, Francesco
    Barbanti, Marco
    Biancari, Fausto
    D'Errigo, Paola
    Onorati, Francesco
    Tamburino, Corrado
    Ranucci, Marco
    Covello, Remo Daniel
    Santoro, Gennaro
    Grossi, Claudio
    Ventura, Martina
    Fusco, Danilo
    Seccareccia, Fulvia
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2016, 9 (05)