When Left Is Right and Right Is Left: The Psychological Correlates of Political Ideology in China

被引:31
作者
Beattie, Peter [1 ]
Chen, Rong [2 ]
Bettache, Karim [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Colgate Univ, Hamilton, NY 13346 USA
关键词
China; cross-cultural; elective affinities; ideology; psychological traits; SOCIAL-DOMINANCE ORIENTATION; BEHAVIORAL IMMUNE-SYSTEM; MORAL FOUNDATIONS THEORY; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; ATTITUDES; VALUES; AUTHORITARIANISM; JUSTIFICATION; CONSERVATISM; LIBERALS;
D O I
10.1111/pops.12776
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
A robust empirical literature suggests that the development of one's political ideology is the product of an "elective affinity" between the discursive, socially constructed elements of ideological belief systems and the psychological constraints, motives, and interests of those who are drawn to those belief systems. However, most studies which support this elective affinity theory have been conducted in the West. In the present study, we tested the theory in China to see whether elective affinities between psychological traits and political ideology are more likely to be universal. Across a nationally representative sample (N = 509), we found initial support for the characterization of the left-right divide in China, albeit in reverse. Namely, the "liberal Right in China mostly evinces traits of the psychological Left in the West (e.g., lower intolerance of ambiguity), while the "conservative Left" mostly evinces traits of the psychological right in the West (e.g., higher system justification). Epistemic motives were most reliably related to political ideology, while existential and relational motives were more mixed; economic and political aspects of ideology were more closely linked to psychological traits than social/cultural aspects. The present findings provide an extension of existing theory and opportunities for further development.
引用
收藏
页码:457 / 488
页数:32
相关论文
共 106 条
[81]   UNIVERSALS IN THE CONTENT AND STRUCTURE OF VALUES - THEORETICAL ADVANCES AND EMPIRICAL TESTS IN 20 COUNTRIES [J].
SCHWARTZ, SH .
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 25 :1-65
[82]  
Seldes George., 1985, The Great Thoughts
[83]   LightDefender: Protecting PIN Input using Ambient Light Sensor [J].
Shang, Jiacheng ;
Wu, Jie .
2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PERVASIVE COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS (PERCOM 2020), 2020,
[84]  
Shi-Kupfer K., 2017, Ideas and ideologies competing for China's political future
[85]   Effect of response format on cognitive reflection: Validating a two- and four-option multiple choice question version of the Cognitive Reflection Test [J].
Sirota, Miroslav ;
Juanchich, Marie .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2018, 50 (06) :2511-2522
[86]  
Soboleva Irina., 2020, Efficacy, Openness, Ingenuousness: Micro-Foundations of Democratic Engagement
[87]   Conservative Syndrome: Individual and Cross-Cultural Differences [J].
Stankov, Lazar .
JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 48 (06) :950-960
[88]  
Sterling J, 2016, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V11, P352
[89]   Liberals Think More Analytically (More "WEIRD") Than Conservatives [J].
Talhelm, Thomas ;
Haidt, Jonathan ;
Oishi, Shigehiro ;
Zhang, Xuemin ;
Miao, Felicity F. ;
Chen, Shimin .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2015, 41 (02) :250-267
[90]   The Effects of General System Justification on Corruption Perception and Intent [J].
Tan, Xuyun ;
Liu, Li ;
Huang, Zhenwei ;
Zheng, Wenwen ;
Liang, Yuan .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 7