Comparison of Outcomes From Daptomycin or Linezolid Treatment for Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcal Bloodstream Infection: A Retrospective, Multicenter, Cohort Study

被引:53
作者
Crank, Christopher W. [1 ]
Scheetz, Marc H. [2 ,3 ]
Brielmaier, Benjamin [4 ]
Rose, Warren E. [1 ]
Patel, Gourang P. [1 ]
Ritchie, David J. [4 ,5 ]
Segreti, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Midwestern Univ, Chicago Coll Pharm, Dept Pharm Practice, Downers Grove, IL 60515 USA
[3] NW Mem Hosp, Dept Pharm, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Barnes Jewish Hosp, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[5] St Louis Coll Pharm, St Louis, MO USA
关键词
vancomycin-resistant enterococcus; daptomycin; linezolid; bacteremia; outcomes; resistance; QUINUPRISTIN-DALFOPRISTIN; BACTEREMIA; INTERMEDIATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.09.008
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: The optimal treatment for bloodstream infections (BSIs) with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) is unknown. Objective: This study examined outcomes in patients treated with daptomycin or linezolid for VRE BSI. Methods: A retrospective, multicenter, cohort study was performed via chart review. Hospitalized patients treated for VRE BSI with daptomycin or linezolid from September 1, 2003, to June 30, 2007, were identified via pharmacy and microbiology reports at each institution. Patients aged <18 years or with polymicrobial bacteremia were excluded from analysis. Linezolid and daptomycin were included because the participating institutions used either of the 2 agents as first-line treatment for VRE BSI. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the effect of drug selection on mortality and duration of BSI. Duration of BSI was defined as the amount of time from the draw date of the first positive blood culture to the draw date of the first finalized negative blood culture. Adverse events were not assessed. Results: One-hundred one patients from 3 participating US hospitals experiencing VRE BSI were identified. Sixty-seven patients were treated with daptomycin and 34 with linezolid. Baseline characteristics appeared comparable between the daptomycin- and linezolid-treated groups, with the exception of shock (P = 0.049), prior vancomycin treatment (P = 0.002), and prior linezolid treatment (P < 0.001), all of which occurred significantly more often in daptomycin-treated patients. Inpatient mortality occurred in 31 daptomycin- and 10 linezolid-treated patients (46.3% vs 29.4%; P = NS). Linear regression found that shock (P = 0.015), infective endocarditis (P = 0.021), and concurrent rifampin or gentamicin treatment (P = 0.01) were associated with prolonged duration of positive cultures. Logistic regression revealed that shock (odds ratio [OR] = 14.24; P = 0.008), infection with Enterococcus faecium (OR = 53.10; P = 0.024), previous linezolid treatment (OR = 6.63; P = 0.031), concurrent rifampin or gentamicin treatment (OR = 6.48; P = 0.046), and a nonline source of infection (OR = 6.67; P = 0.019) were associated with increased mortality. Conclusions: In this retrospective cohort analysis, there were no significant differences in mortality of VRE BSI between patients receiving daptomycin or linezolid. Underlying comorbidities appeared to best predict outcome; however, given the retrospective nature of this study, larger, prospective, randomized, comparative studies are needed to control for potential biases and determine definitive outcome differences between these 2 anti-microbials. (Clin Ther. 2010;32:1713-1719) (C) 2010 Excerpta Medica Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1713 / 1719
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Antimicrobial susceptibility of Gram-positive bacterial isolates from the Asia-Pacific region and an in vitro evaluation of the bactericidal activity of daptomycin, vancomycin, and teicoplanin: a SENTRY Program Report (2003-2004) [J].
Biedenbacha, Douglas J. ;
Bellb, Jan M. ;
Sadera, Helio S. ;
Fritsche, Thomas R. ;
Jones, Ronald N. ;
Turnidge, John D. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2007, 30 (02) :143-149
[2]   Linezolid for the treatment of multidrug-resistant, gram-positive infections: Experience from a compassionate-use program [J].
Birmingham, MC ;
Rayner, CR ;
Meagher, AK ;
Flavin, SM ;
Batts, DH ;
Schentag, JJ .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2003, 36 (02) :159-168
[3]   National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004 [J].
Cardo, D ;
Horan, T ;
Andrus, M ;
Dembinski, M ;
Edwards, J ;
Peavy, G ;
Tolson, J ;
Wagner, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2004, 32 (08) :470-485
[4]   Daptomycin dose-effect relationship against resistant gram-positive organisms [J].
Cha, R ;
Grucz, RG ;
Rybak, MJ .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2003, 47 (05) :1598-1603
[5]  
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [CLSI], 2005, M100S15 CLSI
[6]   Comparison of mortality associated with vancomycin-resistant and vancomycin-susceptible enterococcal bloodstream infections: A meta-analysis [J].
DiazGranados, CA ;
Zimmer, SM ;
Klein, M ;
Jernigan, JA .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2005, 41 (03) :327-333
[7]   Impact of the more-potent antibiotics quinupristin-dalfopristin and linezolid on outcome measure of patients with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus bacteremia [J].
Erlandson, Kristine Mace ;
Sun, Junfeng ;
Iwen, Peter C. ;
Rupp, Mark E. .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2008, 46 (01) :30-36
[8]   Treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium infections with quinupristin/dalfopristin [J].
Linden, PK ;
Moellering, RC ;
Wood, CA ;
Rehm, SJ ;
Flaherty, J ;
Bompart, F ;
Talbot, GH .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2001, 33 (11) :1816-1823
[9]   ENTEROCOCCAL BACTEREMIA - CLINICAL-FEATURES, THE RISK OF ENDOCARDITIS, AND MANAGEMENT [J].
MAKI, DG ;
AGGER, WA .
MEDICINE, 1988, 67 (04) :248-269
[10]   The efficacy and safety of quinupristin/dalfopristin for the treatment of infections caused by vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium [J].
Moellering, RC ;
Linden, PK ;
Reinhardt, J ;
Blumberg, EA ;
Bompart, F ;
Talbot, GH .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1999, 44 (02) :251-261