Development of generic Asian pelvic bone models using CT-based 3D statistical modelling

被引:14
作者
Ahrend, Marc-Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Noser, Hansrudi [1 ]
Shanmugam, Rukmanikanthan [3 ]
Burr, Felix [5 ]
Kamer, Lukas [1 ]
Kamarul, Tunku [4 ]
Huegli, Heinz [5 ]
Nagy, Andreas [5 ]
Richards, Robert Geoff [1 ]
Gueorguiev-Rueegg, Boyko [1 ]
机构
[1] AO Res Inst Davos, Clavadelerstr 8, CH-72070 Davos, Switzerland
[2] Eberhard Karls Univ Tubingen, BG Trauma Ctr Tubingen, Dept Traumatol & Reconstruct Surg, Tubingen, Germany
[3] Univ Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[4] Univ Malaya, Med Ctr, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[5] Synbone AG, Zizers, Switzerland
关键词
Bone models; Bone shape; Pelvic anatomy; Surgical education; MASS-DISTRIBUTION; ANATOMY; PLACEMENT; SACRUM; SHAPE; SIZE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jot.2019.10.004
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background/Objective: Artificial bone models (ABMs) are used in orthopaedics for research of biomechanics, development of implants and educational purposes. Most of the commercially available ABMs approximate the morphology of Europeans, but they may not depict the Asian anatomy. Therefore, our aim was to develop the first Asian ABM of the pelvis and compare it with the existing pelvic ABM (Synbone (R); Caucasian male). Methods: One hundred clinical computed tomography (CTs) of adult pelvises (male n = 50, female n = 50) of Malay, Chinese and Indian descent were acquired. CTs were segmented and defined landmarks were placed. Three 3D statistical pelvic model and mean models (overall, male, female) were generated. Anatomical variations were analysed using principal component analysis. To measure gender-related differences and differences to the existing ABM, distances between the anterior superior iliac spines (ASIS), the anterior inferior iliac spines (AIIS), the promontory and the symphysis (conjugate vera, CV) as well as the ischial spines (diameter transversa, DT) were quantified. Results: Principal component analysis displayed large variability regarding the pelvic shape and size. Female and male statistical models were similar in ASIS (225 +/- 20; 227 +/- 13 mm; P = 0.4153) and AIIS (185 +/- 11; 187 +/- 10 mm; P = 0.3982) and differed in CV (116 +/- 10; 105 +/- 10 mm; P < 0.0001) and DT (105 +/- 7; 88 +/- 8 mm; P < 0.0001). Comparing the unisex mean model with the pre-existing ABM, the ASIS (226; 275 mm; P < 0.0001), the AIIS (186; 209 mm; P < 0.0001) and the CV (111; 105 mm; P < 0.0001) differed significantly. Both models were similar regarding DT (97; 95 mm; P = 0.6927). The analysis revealed notable gender- and size-dependent anatomical variations within the Asian population. Chinese, Malay and Indian descents did not differ notably. The overall Asian model was smaller than the existing ABM. The translation potential of this article: Owing to the large differences between the Asian ABM and the pre-existing ABM, as well as differences between genders, the use of an Asian- and gender-specific ABM is important to consider in research, biomechanics and implant development for this population.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 106
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Assessment of technical skills transfer from the bench training model to the human model
    Anastakis, DJ
    Regehr, G
    Reznick, RK
    Cusimano, M
    Murnaghan, J
    Brown, M
    Hutchison, C
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 177 (02) : 167 - 170
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2012, POLYURETHANE
  • [3] 3D statistical model of the pelvic ring - a CT-based statistical evaluation of anatomical variation
    Arand, Charlotte
    Wagner, Daniel
    Richards, Robert Geoff
    Noser, Hansrudi
    Kamer, Lukas
    Sawaguchi, Takeshi
    Rommens, Pol M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANATOMY, 2019, 234 (03) : 376 - 383
  • [4] Differences in lumbar and pelvic parameters among African American, Caucasian and Asian populations
    Arima, Hideyuki
    Dimar, John R., II
    Glassman, Steven D.
    Yamato, Yu
    Matsuyama, Yukihiro
    Mac-Thiong, Jean-Marc
    Roussouly, Pierre
    Cook, Brandon
    Carreon, Leah Y.
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 27 (12) : 2990 - 2998
  • [5] Atesok K, 2012, J AM ACAD ORTHOP SUR, V20, P410, DOI [10.5435/JAAOS-20-06-410, 10.5435/JAAOS-20-07-410]
  • [6] The safe screw path along inferior border of the arcuate line at acetabular area: an anatomical study based on CT scans
    Bi, Chun
    Wang, Jiandong
    Ji, Xiaoxi
    Ma, Zhijian
    Wang, Fang
    Zeng, Xiangsen
    Wang, Dongmei
    Wang, Qiugen
    [J]. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2017, 18
  • [7] Bookstein F.L, 1997, MORPHOMETRIC TOOLS L, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511573064
  • [8] Buckley Richard E, 2018, AO PRINCIPLES FRACTU
  • [9] Composite Bone Models in Orthopaedic Surgery Research and Education
    Elfar, John J.
    Menorca, Ron Martin Garcia
    Reed, Jeffrey Douglas
    Stanbury, Spencer
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2014, 22 (02) : 111 - 120
  • [10] HOAGLUND FT, 1980, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P10