Clinical Low Dose Photon Counting CT for the Detection of Urolithiasis: Evaluation of Image Quality and Radiation Dose

被引:20
作者
Niehoff, Julius Henning [1 ]
Carmichael, Alexandra Fiona [2 ]
Woeltjen, Matthias Michael [1 ]
Boriesosdick, Jan [1 ]
Schmidt, Ingo Lopez [1 ]
Michael, Arwed Elias [1 ]
Hokamp, Nils Grosse [3 ,4 ]
Piechota, Hansjuergen [2 ]
Borggrefe, Jan [1 ]
Kroeger, Jan Robert [1 ]
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Johannes Wesling Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol Neuroradiol & Nucl Med, D-44801 Bochum, Germany
[2] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Johannes Wesling Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, D-44801 Bochum, Germany
[3] Univ Cologne, Fac Med, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
[4] Univ Cologne, Univ Hosp Cologne, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
关键词
photon counting CT; low-dose CT; CT image quality; CT radiation dose; urolithiasis; KIDNEY-STONES; MAMMOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.3390/tomography8040138
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was the evaluation of image quality and radiation dose parameters of the novel photon counting CT (PCCT, Naeotom Alpha, Siemens Healthineers) using low-dose scan protocols for the detection of urolithiasis. Standard CT scans were used as a reference (S40, Somatom Sensation 40, Siemens Healthineers). Sixty-three patients, who underwent CT scans between August and December 2021, were retrospectively enrolled. Thirty-one patients were examined with the PCCT and 32 patients were examined with the S40. Radiation dose parameters, as well as quantitative and qualitative image parameters, were analyzed. The presence of urolithiasis, image quality, and diagnostic certainty were rated on a 5-point-scale by 3 blinded readers. Both patient groups (PCCT and S40) did not differ significantly in terms of body mass index. Radiation dose was significantly lower for examinations with the PCCT compared to the S40 (2.4 +/- 1.0 mSv vs. 3.4 +/- 1.0 mSv; p < 0.001). The SNR was significantly better on images acquired with the PCCT (13.3 +/- 3.3 vs. 8.2 +/- 1.9; p < 0.001). The image quality of the PCCT was rated significantly better (4.3 +/- 0.7 vs. 2.8 +/- 0.6; p < 0.001). The detection rate of kidney or ureter calculi was excellent with both CT scanners (PCCT 97.8% and S40 99%, p = 0.611). In high contrast imaging, such as the depiction of stones of the kidney and the ureter, PCCT allows a significant reduction of radiation dose, while maintaining excellent diagnostic confidence and image quality. Given this image quality with our current protocol, further adjustments towards ultra-low-dose CT scans appear feasible.
引用
收藏
页码:1666 / 1675
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Substantial radiation dose reduction with consistent image quality using a novel low-dose stone composition protocol [J].
Apfaltrer, Georg ;
Dutschke, Anja ;
Baltzer, Pascal A. T. ;
Schestak, Christian ;
Oezsoy, Mehmet ;
Seitz, Christian ;
Veser, Julian ;
Petter, Elisabeth ;
Helbich, Thomas H. ;
Ringl, Helmut ;
Apfaltrer, Paul .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 38 (11) :2971-2979
[2]   An overview of kidney stone imaging techniques [J].
Brisbane, Wayne ;
Bailey, Michael R. ;
Sorensen, Mathew D. .
NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2016, 13 (11) :654-662
[3]   Low-dose computed tomography of urolithiasis in obese patients: a feasibility study to evaluate image reconstruction algorithms [J].
Chang, De-Hua ;
Slebocki, Karin ;
Khristenko, Ekaterina ;
Herden, Jan ;
Salem, Johannes ;
Hokamp, Nils Grosse ;
Mammadov, Kamal ;
Hellmich, Martin ;
Kabbasch, Christoph .
DIABETES METABOLIC SYNDROME AND OBESITY-TARGETS AND THERAPY, 2019, 12 :439-445
[4]   Low-dose CT of the abdomen: Initial experience on a novel photon-counting detector CT and comparison with energy-integrating detector CT [J].
Decker, Josua A. ;
Bette, Stefanie ;
Lubina, Nora ;
Rippel, Katharina ;
Braun, Franziska ;
Risch, Franka ;
Wollny, Claudia ;
Scheurig-Muenkler, Christian ;
Kroencke, Thomas J. ;
Schwarz, Florian .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 148
[5]   Unenhanced helical CT using increased pitch for suspected renal colic: An effective technique for radiation dose reduction? [J].
Diel, J ;
Perlmutter, S ;
Venkataramanan, N ;
Mueller, R ;
Lane, MJ ;
Katz, DS .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2000, 24 (05) :795-801
[6]   Photon-counting CT review [J].
Flohr, Thomas ;
Petersilka, Martin ;
Henning, Andre ;
Ulzheimer, Stefan ;
Ferda, Jiri ;
Schmidt, Bernhard .
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 79 :126-136
[7]   Clinical Effectiveness Protocols for Imaging in the Management of Ureteral Calculous Disease: AUA Technology Assessment [J].
Fulgham, Pat Fox ;
Assimos, Dean G. ;
Pearle, Margaret Sue ;
Preminger, Glenn M. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04) :1203-1213
[8]   CT of Urolithiasis: Comparison of Image Quality and Diagnostic Confidence Using Filtered Back Projection and Iterative Reconstruction Techniques [J].
Hansmann, Jan ;
Schoenberg, Gita M. ;
Brix, Gunnar ;
Henzler, Thomas ;
Meyer, Mathias ;
Attenberger, Ulrike I. ;
Schoenberg, Stefan O. ;
Fink, Christian .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2013, 20 (09) :1162-1167
[9]   Low-Dose Characterization of Kidney Stones Using Spectral Detector Computed Tomography An Ex Vivo Study [J].
Hokamp, Nils Grosse ;
Salem, Johannes ;
Hesse, Albrecht ;
Holz, Jasmin Alexandra ;
Ritter, Manuel ;
Heidenreich, Axel ;
Maintz, David ;
Haneder, Stefan .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2018, 53 (08) :457-462
[10]   First results from a hybrid prototype CT scanner for exploring benefits of quantum-counting in clinical CT [J].
Kappler, S. ;
Hannemann, T. ;
Kraft, E. ;
Kreisler, B. ;
Niederloehner, D. ;
Stierstorfer, K. ;
Flohr, T. .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2012: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2012, 8313