Augmented-reality-based skills training for robot-assisted urethrovesical anastomosis: a multi-institutional randomised controlled trial

被引:67
作者
Chowriappa, Ashirwad [1 ,2 ]
Raza, Syed Johar [1 ]
Fazili, Anees [3 ]
Field, Erinn [1 ]
Malito, Chelsea [1 ]
Samarasekera, Dinesh [4 ]
Shi, Yi [1 ]
Ahmed, Kamran [7 ]
Wilding, Gregory [1 ]
Kaouk, Jihad [4 ]
Eun, Daniel D. [5 ]
Ghazi, Ahmed [3 ]
Peabody, James O. [2 ,6 ]
Kesavadas, Thenkurussi [2 ]
Mohler, James L. [1 ]
Guru, Khurshid A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
[2] SUNY Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[3] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[4] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[5] Temple Univ Hosp & Med Sch, Philadelphia, PA 19140 USA
[6] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Detroit, MI USA
[7] Kings Coll London, London, England
关键词
anastomosis; augmented reality; robot-assisted; robotic; skills training; urethrovesical anastomosis; BENCH MODEL FIDELITY; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY; OPERATING-ROOM; SIMULATION; VALIDATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1111/bju.12704
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To validate robot-assisted surgery skills acquisition using an augmented reality (AR)-based module for urethrovesical anastomosis (UVA). Methods Participants at three institutions were randomised to a Hands-on Surgical Training (HoST) technology group or a control group. The HoST group was given procedure-based training for UVA within the haptic-enabled AR-based HoST environment. The control group did not receive any training. After completing the task, the control group was offered to cross over to the HoST group (cross-over group). A questionnaire administered after HoST determined the feasibility and acceptability of the technology. Performance of UVA using an inanimate model on the daVinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) was assessed using a UVA evaluation score and a Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) score. Participants completed the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA TLX) questionnaire for cognitive assessment, as outcome measures. A Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare outcomes among the groups (HoST group vs control group and control group vs cross-over group). Results A total of 52 individuals participated in the study. UVA evaluation scores showed significant differences in needle driving (3.0 vs 2.3; P = 0.042), needle positioning (3.0 vs 2.4; P = 0.033) and suture placement (3.4 vs 2.6; P = 0.014) in the HoST vs the control group. The HoST group obtained significantly higher scores (14.4 vs 11.9; P 0.012) on the GEARS. The NASA TLX indicated lower temporal demand and effort in the HoST group (5.9 vs 9.3; P = 0.001 and 5.8 vs 11.9; P = 0.035, respectively). In all, 70% of participants found that HoST was similar to the real surgical procedure, and 75% believed that HoST could improve confidence for carrying out the real intervention. Conclusion Training in UVA in an AR environment improves technical skill acquisition with minimal cognitive demand.
引用
收藏
页码:336 / 345
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Current status of validation for robotic surgery simulators a systematic review
    Abboudi, Hamid
    Khan, Mohammed S.
    Aboumarzouk, Omar
    Guru, Khurshid A.
    Challacombe, Ben
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Ahmed, Kamran
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 (02) : 194 - 205
  • [2] Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: What is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator
    Botden, Sanne M. B. I.
    Buzink, Sonja N.
    Schijven, Marlies P.
    Jakimowicz, Jack J.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 31 (04) : 764 - 772
  • [3] What is going on in augmented reality simulation in laparoscopic surgery?
    Botden, Sanne M. B. I.
    Jakimowicz, Jack J.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2009, 23 (08): : 1693 - 1700
  • [4] Development and validation of a composite scoring system for robot-assisted surgical training-the Robotic Skills Assessment Score
    Chowriappa, Ashirwad J.
    Shi, Yi
    Raza, Syed Johar
    Ahmed, Kamran
    Stegemann, Andrew
    Wilding, Gregory
    Kaouk, Jihad
    Peabody, James O.
    Menon, Mani
    Hassett, James M.
    Kesavadas, Thenkurussi
    Guru, Khurshid A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2013, 185 (02) : 561 - 569
  • [5] ARSC: Augmented reality student card An augmented reality solution for the education field
    El Sayed, Neven A. M.
    Zayed, Hala H.
    Sharawy, Mohamed I.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2011, 56 (04) : 1045 - 1061
  • [6] Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills: Validation of a Clinical Assessment Tool to Measure Robotic Surgical Skills
    Goh, Alvin C.
    Goldfarb, David W.
    Sander, James C.
    Miles, Brian J.
    Dunkin, Brian J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (01) : 247 - 252
  • [7] Guru KA, 2011, J UROLOGY, V186, P1024, DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2011.04.119
  • [8] HART S G, 1988, P139
  • [9] A context-aware ubiquitous learning environment for conducting complex science experiments
    Hwang, Gwo-Jen
    Yang, Tzu-Chi
    Tsai, Chin-Chung
    Yang, Stephen J. H.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2009, 53 (02) : 402 - 413
  • [10] Learning a spatial skill for surgery: How the contributions of abilities change with practice
    Keehner, M
    Lippa, Y
    Montello, DR
    Tendick, F
    Hegarty, M
    [J]. APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 20 (04) : 487 - 503