Deep learning-based stochastic modelling and uncertainty analysis of fault networks

被引:11
作者
Han, Shuai [1 ]
Li, Heng [1 ]
Li, Mingchao [2 ]
Zhang, Jiawen [2 ]
Guo, Runhao [1 ]
Ma, Jie [1 ]
Zhao, Wenchao [3 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Bldg & Real Estate, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ, State Key Lab Hydraul Engn Simulat & Safety, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[3] China Water Resources Beifang Invest Design & Res, Tianjin, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Uncertainty modelling; Fault networks; Mixture density network; Spatial uncertainty perception (SUP); Graph representation (GRep); MACHINE; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1007/s10064-022-02735-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Limited by the survey data and current interpretation methods, the modelling processes of fault networks are fraught with uncertainties. In hydraulic geological engineering, the location uncertainty of faults plays a vital role in decision-making and engineering safety. However, traditional uncertainty modelling methods have difficulty obtaining accurate uncertainty quantification and topology representation. To this end, we proposed a novel solution for uncertainty analysis and three-dimensional modelling for faults via a deep learning approach. A spatial uncertainty perception (SUP) method is first presented based on a modified deep mixture density network (MDN), which can be used to learn the spatial distributions of fault zones, calculate the probability of fault models, and simulate stochastic models with certain confidence degrees. After that, a graph representation (GRep) method is developed to express the topological form and geological ages of fault networks. The GRep makes it possible to automatically simulate the spatial distributions of fault belts, thus providing an effective way for the uncertainty modelling and assessment of fault networks. The two methods are then performed in the geological engineering of a practical hydraulic project. The results show that this solution can conduct accurate uncertainty evaluations and visualizations on fault networks, thus providing suggestions for subsequent geological investigations.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Comparative analysis of real-time kinematic and PPP techniques in dynamic environment [J].
Alkan, Reha Metin ;
Erol, Serdar ;
Ilci, Veli ;
Ozulu, I. Murat .
MEASUREMENT, 2020, 163
[2]   Uncertainty Quantification in Reservoir Prediction: Part 1Model Realism in History Matching Using Geological Prior Definitions [J].
Arnold, Dan ;
Demyanov, Vasily ;
Rojas, Temistocles ;
Christie, Mike .
MATHEMATICAL GEOSCIENCES, 2019, 51 (02) :209-240
[3]   Quantifying structural uncertainty on fault networks using a marked point process within a Bayesian framework [J].
Aydin, Orhun ;
Caers, Jef Karel .
TECTONOPHYSICS, 2017, 712 :101-124
[4]   Hybrid geological modeling: Combining machine learning and multiple-point statistics [J].
Bai, Tao ;
Tahmasebi, Pejman .
COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2020, 142
[5]  
Bishop C.M., 2006, Information Science and Statistics
[6]  
Chan S, 2017, ARXIV PREPRINT
[7]   Stochastic structural modelling in sparse data situations [J].
Cherpeau, Nicolas ;
Caumon, Guillaume .
PETROLEUM GEOSCIENCE, 2015, 21 (04) :233-247
[8]   Stochastic simulations of fault networks in 3D structural modeling [J].
Cherpeau, Nicolas ;
Caumon, Guillaume ;
Levy, Bruno .
COMPTES RENDUS GEOSCIENCE, 2010, 342 (09) :687-694
[9]   Geological mapping using remote sensing data: A comparison of five machine learning algorithms, their response to variations in the spatial distribution of training data and the use of explicit spatial information [J].
Cracknell, Matthew J. ;
Reading, Anya M. .
COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2014, 63 :22-33
[10]   Structural geologic modeling as an inference problem: A Bayesian perspective [J].
de la Varga, Miguel ;
Wellmann, J. Florian .
INTERPRETATION-A JOURNAL OF SUBSURFACE CHARACTERIZATION, 2016, 4 (03) :SM1-SM16