Increasing Throughput in Fused Deposition Modeling by Modulating Bed Temperature

被引:14
作者
Snapp, Kelsey L. [1 ]
Gongora, Aldair E. [1 ]
Brown, Keith A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Dept Mech Engn, 110 Cummington Mall, Boston, MA 02215 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME | 2021年 / 143卷 / 09期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
fused deposition modeling (FDM); bed adhesion; removal temperature; additive manufacturing; process engineering; sensing; monitoring and diagnostics; FILAMENT;
D O I
10.1115/1.4050177
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Additive manufacturing (AM) techniques, such as fused deposition modeling (FDM), are able to fabricate physical components from three-dimensional (3D) digital models through the sequential deposition of material onto a print bed in a layer-by-layer fashion. In FDM and many other AM techniques, it is critical that the part adheres to the bed during printing. After printing, however, excessive bed adhesion can lead to part damage or prevent automated part removal. In this work, we validate a novel testing method that quickly and cheaply evaluates bed adhesion without constraints on part geometry. Using this method, we study the effect of bed temperature on the peak removal force for polylactic acid (PLA) parts printed on bare borosilicate glass and polyimide (PI)-coated beds. In addition to validating conventional wisdom that bed adhesion is maximized between 60 and 70 degrees C (140 and 158 degrees F), we observe that cooling the bed below 40 degrees C (104 degrees F), as is commonly done to facilitate part removal, has minimal additional benefit. Counterintuitively, we find that heating the bed after printing is often a more efficient process for facile part removal. In addition to introducing a general method for measuring and optimizing bed adhesion via bed temperature modulation, these results can be used to accelerate the production and testing of AM components in printer farms and autonomous research systems.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Process-structure-property effects on ABS bond strength in fused filament fabrication [J].
Abbott, A. C. ;
Tandon, G. P. ;
Bradford, R. L. ;
Koerner, H. ;
Baur, J. W. .
ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2018, 19 :29-38
[2]   Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS [J].
Ahn, SH ;
Montero, M ;
Odell, D ;
Roundy, S ;
Wright, PK .
RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2002, 8 (04) :248-257
[3]   Investigation of the mechanical properties and porosity relationships in fused deposition modelling-fabricated porous structures [J].
Ang, Ker Chin ;
Leong, Kah Fai ;
Chua, Chee Kai ;
Chandrasekaran, Margam .
RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2006, 12 (02) :100-105
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, 3D PRINTING ADDITIVE
[5]  
[Anonymous], Collaborative Robots vs. Covid-19 - Universal Robots
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, F279212A ASTM
[7]  
Aravind A.U., 2020, MATER TODAY-PROC
[8]   Fracture mechanical characterization and lifetime estimation of near-homogeneous components produced by fused filament fabrication [J].
Arbeiter, Florian ;
Spoerk, Martin ;
Wiener, Johannes ;
Gosch, Anja ;
Pinter, Gerald .
POLYMER TESTING, 2018, 66 :105-113
[9]   Additive Manufacturing Review: Early Past to Current Practice [J].
Beaman, J. J. ;
Bourell, D. L. ;
Seepersad, C. C. ;
Kovar, D. .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2020, 142 (11)
[10]   Liquefier dynamics in fused deposition [J].
Bellini, A ;
Güçeri, S ;
Bertoldi, M .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2004, 126 (02) :237-246