The Size and Composition of Corporate Headquarters in Multinational Companies: Empirical Evidence

被引:24
作者
Collis, David [1 ]
Young, David [2 ]
Goold, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Grad Sch Business Adm, Soldiers Field, Boston, MA 02163 USA
[2] Ashridge Strateg Management Ctr, London WC2B 6ST, England
关键词
Headquarters; Subsidiaries; Multinational corporations; Organization design; Administrative heritage; International strategy; ADVANTAGES; FIRM;
D O I
10.1016/j.intman.2012.06.002
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Based on a six country survey of nearly 250 multinationals (MNCs), this paper is the first empirical analysis to describe the size and composition of MNC headquarters and to account for differences among them. Findings are that: MNC corporate headquarters are more involved in "obligatory" and value creating and control functions than in operational activities; there are no systematic differences in the determinants of the size and composition of corporate headquarters between MNCs and purely domestic companies; as the geographic scope of an MNC increases two offsetting phenomena occur - headquarters decrease their influence over operational units which ceteris paribus reduces the size of headquarters, but the relative size of obligatory functions at headquarters increases with increased country heterogeneity. The net effect is that the size of corporate headquarters expands as MNC geographic scope increases. The notion of "administrative heritage" is validated as MNCs from different countries have substantially different corporate headquarters - US headquarters are large (255 median staff for a 20,000 FTE MNC) and European headquarters smaller (124). Implications are drawn that countries will lose activities if domestic firms are acquired by foreign MNCs, and that MNCs need to allow more subsidiary autonomy as their geographic scope increases. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:260 / 275
页数:16
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Albert M., 1993, CAPITALISM CAPITALIS
[2]   What are the consequences of initiative-taking in multinational subsidiaries? [J].
Ambos, Tina C. ;
Andersson, Ulf ;
Birkinshaw, Julian .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2010, 41 (07) :1099-1118
[3]   Balancing subsidiary influence in the federative MNC: a business network view [J].
Andersson, Ulf ;
Forsgren, Mats ;
Holm, Ulf .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2007, 38 (05) :802-818
[4]  
[Anonymous], WORLD 3 0
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, MANAGING EMBEDDED MU
[6]  
[Anonymous], GLOB EC PROSP FISC H
[7]  
Aral S., 2006, WHICH CAME 1 IT PROD
[8]   ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN FOR BUSINESS UNITS [J].
BAIMAN, S ;
LARCKER, DF ;
RAJAN, MV .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1995, 33 (02) :205-229
[9]  
Bandick R., 2010, 5252 RD IZA
[10]  
Bartlett C.A., 1989, MANAGING BORDERS TRA