Effects of protein supplementation to steers consuming low-quality forages on greenhouse gas emissions

被引:8
作者
Shreck, Adam L. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Zeltwanger, Joshua M. [2 ]
Bailey, Eric A. [2 ]
Jennings, Jenny S. [3 ]
Meyer, Beverly E. [1 ]
Cole, Noel Andy [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Conservat & Prod Res Lab, PO Drawer 10, Bushland, TX 79012 USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Div Anim Sci, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[3] Texas A&M Agrilife Res, Amarillo, TX USA
[4] USDA ARS, Washington, DC 20250 USA
[5] Feedlot Hlth Management Serv, Okotoks, AB, Canada
基金
美国农业部;
关键词
cattle; low-quality forage; methane; protein; DEGRADABLE INTAKE PROTEIN; TALLGRASS-PRAIRIE FORAGE; ACID-INSOLUBLE ASH; METHANE PRODUCTION; RUMEN FERMENTATION; NITROGEN-BALANCE; BEEF STEERS; FEED-INTAKE; CATTLE; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1093/jas/skab147
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Providing supplements that enhance the efficiency of feed utilization can reduce methane (CH4) emissions from ruminants. Protein supplementation is widely used to increase intake and digestion of low-quality forages, yet little is known about its impact on CH4 emissions. British-cross steers (n = 23; initial body weight [BW] = 344 +/- 33.9 kg) were used in a three-period crossover design to evaluate the effect of protein supplementation to beef cattle consuming low-quality forage on ruminal CH4, metabolic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, forage intake, and ruminal fermentation. Steers individually had ad libitum access to low-quality bluestem hay (4.6% crude protein [CP]) and were provided supplemental protein based on (dry matter basis): cottonseed meal (CSM; 0.29% of BW daily; 391 g/d CP), dried distillers grains with solubles (DDGS; 0.41% of BW daily 563 g/d CP), or none (CON). Urea was added to DDGS to match rumen degradable protein provided by CSM. Ruminal CH4 and metabolic CO2 fluxes were obtained 2.4 +/- 0.4 times per steer daily using an automated open-circuit gas quantification system (GreenFeed emission monitoring system; C-Lock Inc., Rapid City, SD). Forage intake increased (P < 0.01) with protein supplementation; however, no difference in forage intake (P = 0.14) was observed between CSM and DDGS treatments. Flux of CO2 (g/d) was greater (P < 0.01) for steers fed CSM and DDGS than for steers fed CON. Steers supplemented with CSM had greater (P < 0.01) CH4 emissions (211 g/d) than DDGS (197 g/d) both of which were greater (P < 0.01) than CON (175 g/d). Methane emissions as a proportion of gross energy intake (GEI) were lowest (P < 0.01) for DDGS (7.66%), intermediate for CSM (8.46%) steers, and greatest for CON (10.53%). Steers fed DDGS also had the lowest (P < 0.01) ruminal acetate:propionate ratio (3.60), whereas CSM (4.89) was intermediate, and CON (5.64) steers were greatest. This study suggests that the common practice of supplementing protein to cattle consuming low-quality forage decreases greenhouse gas emissions per unit of GEI.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
AOAC, 1990, "Official Method Analysis 975.03. Metals in Plants and Pets Food Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometric Method.", V15th ed.
[2]  
Bandyk CA, 2001, J ANIM SCI, V79, P225
[3]   Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from beef production in western Canada - Evaluation using farm-based life cycle assessment [J].
Beauchemin, K. A. ;
Janzen, H. H. ;
Little, S. M. ;
McAllister, T. A. ;
McGinn, S. M. .
ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 166-67 :663-677
[4]  
Beauchemin KA, 2005, J ANIM SCI, V83, P653
[5]   Methane abatement strategies for cattle: Lipid supplementation of diets [J].
Beauchemin, Karen A. ;
McGinn, Sean M. ;
Petit, Helene V. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2007, 87 (03) :431-440
[6]   Fat supplements differing in physical form improve performance but divergently influence methane emissions of grazing beef cattle [J].
Beck, M. R. ;
Thompson, L. R. ;
Williams, G. D. ;
Place, S. E. ;
Gunter, S. A. ;
Reuter, R. R. .
ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 254
[7]  
Beck M. R., 2018, Professional Animal Scientist, V34, P339, DOI 10.15232/pas.2018-01722
[8]   Methane production from dairy and beef heifers fed forages differing in nutrient density using the sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer gas technique [J].
Boadi, DA ;
Wittenberg, KM .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2002, 82 (02) :201-206
[9]   Protein supplementation of ruminants consuming low-quality cool- or warm-season forage: Differences in intake and digestibility [J].
Bohnert, D. W. ;
DelCurto, T. ;
Clark, A. A. ;
Merrill, M. L. ;
Falck, S. J. ;
Harmon, D. L. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2011, 89 (11) :3707-3717
[10]   A universal equation to predict methane production of forage-fed cattle in Australia [J].
Charmley, E. ;
Williams, S. R. O. ;
Moate, P. J. ;
Hegarty, R. S. ;
Herd, R. M. ;
Oddy, V. H. ;
Reyenga, P. ;
Staunton, K. M. ;
Anderson, A. ;
Hannah, M. C. .
ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2016, 56 (2-3) :169-180