Numerical and Experimental Comparison of Ducted and Non-Ducted Propellers

被引:30
作者
Villa, Diego [1 ]
Gaggero, Stefano [1 ]
Tani, Giorgio [1 ]
Viviani, Michele [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Genoa, Elect Elect & Telecommun Engn & Naval Architectur, I-16126 Genoa, Italy
关键词
Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS); adaptive mesh refinement (AMR); ducted propeller; validations and verifications; WAKE; PREDICTION; EVOLUTION; MODEL; PERFORMANCE; MECHANISMS; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.3390/jmse8040257
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
Ducted propellers are unconventional systems that are usually adopted for ship propulsion. These devices have recently been studied with medium-fidelity computational fluid dynamics code (based on the potential flow hypothesis) with promising results. However, these tools, even though they provide a good prediction of the forces and moments generated by the blades and the duct, are not able to provide insight into the flow field characteristics due to their crude flow approximations. On the contrary, modern high-fidelity viscous-based computational fluid dynamics codes could give a better description of the near and far-field flow of these particular devices. In the present paper, forces and the most significant features of the flow field around two ducted propellers are analyzed by means of both experimental and computational fluid dynamics approaches. In particular, accelerating and decelerating ducts are considered, and we demonstrate the ability of the adopted solver to accurately predict the performance and the flow field for both types. These results, in particular for the less-studied decelerating duct, designate CFD as a useful tool for reliable designs.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Energy balance analysis of model-scale vessel with open and ducted propeller configuration [J].
Andersson, Jennie ;
Eslamdoost, Arash ;
Vikstrom, Marko ;
Bensow, Rickard E. .
OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2018, 167 :369-379
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, 3 INT S MAR PROP SMP
[3]   A CFD-based scaling approach for ducted propellers [J].
Bhattacharyya, Anirban ;
Krasilnikov, Vladimir ;
Steen, Sverre .
OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2016, 123 :116-130
[4]   Performance analysis of ducted marine propellers. Part II - Accelerating duct [J].
Bontempo, R. ;
Manna, M. .
APPLIED OCEAN RESEARCH, 2018, 75 :153-164
[5]   Performance analysis of ducted marine propellers. Part I - Decelerating duct [J].
Bontempo, R. ;
Cardone, M. ;
Manna, M. .
APPLIED OCEAN RESEARCH, 2016, 58 :322-330
[6]  
Bosschers J., 2015, Proc. 4th Int. Symposium on Marine Propulsors, P639
[7]  
Boutier A., 1991, YTI LASER VELOCIM, V1, P23
[8]  
Carlton JS, 2019, MARINE PROPELLERS AND PROPULSION, 4TH EDITION, P469, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-100366-4.00022-5
[9]   Full scale self-propulsion computations using discretized propeller for the KRISO container ship KCS [J].
Castro, Alejandro M. ;
Carrica, Pablo M. ;
Stern, Frederick .
COMPUTERS & FLUIDS, 2011, 51 (01) :35-47
[10]   Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications [J].
Celik, Ishmail B. ;
Ghia, Urmila ;
Roache, Patrick J. ;
Freitas, Christopher J. .
JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2008, 130 (07) :0780011-0780014