Affirmative reaction: The influence of type of justification on nonbeneficiary attitudes toward affirmative action plans in higher education

被引:12
作者
Knight, JL [1 ]
Hebl, MR [1 ]
机构
[1] Rice Univ, Dept Psychol, Houston, TX 77005 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00420.x
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
It is popularly believed that justifying an affirmative action plan (AAP) through emphasizing the advantages that diverse students can bring to a college campus will increase nonbeneficiary support for the program. However, there has been little empirical support for this proposition, perhaps because previous research has not directly articulated to participants the value of a diverse student body. As such, the current study sought to determine how the explicit framing of an AAP influences subsequent reactions. Both quantitative and qualitative data from 216 White undergraduate participants revealed that the utilitarianism justification that highlighted the benefits of the AAP to both minority and majority students, was the most effective means of increasing support for the plan.
引用
收藏
页码:547 / 568
页数:22
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], AFFIRMATIVE ACTION T
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, HUMAN DIVERSITY PERS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, VALUING DIVERSITY NE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1997, RES JUDGMENT DECISIO
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1991, ACAD MANAGE EXEC
[6]  
[Anonymous], J BUSINESS, DOI DOI 10.1086/296365
[7]  
Arredondo P., 1996, SUCCESSFUL DIVERSITY
[8]  
BARNESNACOSTE R, 1990, LAW POLICY, V12, P175
[9]  
BARNESNACOSTE RW, 1994, BASIC APPL SOC PSYCH, V15, P87
[10]   Forming, changing, and acting on attitude toward affirmative action programs in employment: A theory-driven approach [J].
Bell, MP ;
Harrison, DA ;
McLaughlin, ME .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 85 (05) :784-798