Interactive Voice Response Version of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument

被引:1
作者
Chang, Feng-Hang [1 ,2 ]
Latham, Nancy K. [2 ]
Friedman, Robert H. [3 ]
Jette, Alan M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Taipei Med Univ, Grad Inst Injury Prevent & Control, Taipei 110, Taiwan
[2] Boston Univ, Hlth & Disabil Res Inst, Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA USA
[3] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02118 USA
关键词
automated telephone system; aging; interactive voice response; disability; participation; EXERCISE COACH; TECHNOLOGY; QUALITY; SYSTEMS; AGENTS; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/jgs.13337
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo develop an interactive voice response (IVR) version of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument Computer Adaptive Test (LLFDI-CAT) and to evaluate its reliability and acceptability in older adults. DesignThe IVR system was embedded within the LLFDI-CAT program. To test the test-retest reliability and concordance of the IVR version of LLFDI-CAT with the telephone interviewer form (TIF), participants received the two versions of the LLFDI at baseline and at 1-week follow-up. SettingCommunity. ParticipantsCommunity-dwelling adults aged 65 and older (N=50). MeasurementsThe LLFDI is a self-reported outcome measure developed to assess function and disability in older adults. ResultsThe IVR version of the LLFDI-CAT showed acceptable overall test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)=0.79-0.80) and concordance (ICC=0.74-0.97) with the TIF. Although most participants preferred the TIF, the majority did not find the IVR version more difficult to use. ConclusionThe IVR version of the LLFDI-CAT achieved reliability levels that were comparable with those of the TIF version. Future work is needed to improve the IVR design to better fit older adults' needs and preferences.
引用
收藏
页码:770 / 775
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[21]   Automating standard alcohol use assessment instruments via interactive voice response technology [J].
Mundt, JC ;
Bohn, MJ ;
King, M ;
Hartley, MT .
ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 26 (02) :207-211
[22]  
Nagi S.Z., 1991, DISABILITY AM, P309, DOI DOI 10.17226/1579
[23]  
Piette JD, 2000, AM J MANAG CARE, V6, P817
[24]  
Portney LeslieG., 2008, Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice, P585
[25]   Assessing reproducibility for interval data in health-related quality of life questionnaires: Which coefficient should be used? [J].
Schuck, P .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2004, 13 (03) :571-586
[26]   THE MOS 36-ITEM SHORT-FORM HEALTH SURVEY (SF-36) .1. CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK AND ITEM SELECTION [J].
WARE, JE ;
SHERBOURNE, CD .
MEDICAL CARE, 1992, 30 (06) :473-483
[27]   Quality of patient-reported outcome data captured using paper and interactive voice response diaries in an allergic rhinitis study: is electronic data capture really better? [J].
Weiler, K ;
Christ, AM ;
Woodworth, GG ;
Weiler, RL ;
Weiler, JM .
ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2004, 92 (03) :335-339
[28]  
World Health Organization (WHO), 2001, INT CLASS FUNCT DIS