Understanding holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) recovery: Assessing patient expectations and understanding

被引:4
|
作者
Assmus, Mark A. [1 ]
Lee, Matthew S. [2 ]
Large, Tim [1 ]
Krambeck, Amy E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Urol, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Urol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
来源
CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL | 2022年 / 16卷 / 01期
关键词
URINARY-TRACT SYMPTOMS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.5489/cuaj.7328
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Although holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is a highly effective surgery, there is a variable recovery period where patients may experience hematuria, dysuria, or urinary incontinence (UI). Despite preoperative consultation, there is a paucity of literature examining the effectiveness of physician-patient communication in preparing the patient for the postoperative recovery period. We sought to examine recovery expectations as a patient-reported outcome (PRO) metric for HoLEP. Methods: With institutional review board approval, we queried our electronic medical record and retrospective clinical registry to identify 50 consecutive patients that underwent HoLEP from November 2019 to March 2020 by two endourologists. Patients were provided questionnaires via Twistle(C) >= 6 months postoperatively. Patient demographics and perioperative course was examined in the context of responses. Our primary objective was determining whether patients felt they had a reasonable understanding of the recovery process. Results: We observed a 92% (46/50) response rate, with an average patient age of 69.4 years (range 55-88). Overall, 91.3% (42/46) felt they had a reasonable understanding of the recovery. Additionally, 97.8% (45/46) were aware of temporary UI, with 87% having >= 1 episodes of UI after catheter removal. We found 47.8% (22/46) of patients expected UI to resolve within 30 days, while 8.6% expected >90 days of UI. All patients wore aware of the risk of hematuria, with 93.5% (43/46) expecting resolution within 30 days (<7 days: 47.8%; 7-14 days: 28.3%; 15-30 days: 17.4%). Conclusions: Although surgical technique continues to improve HoLEP, ensuring adequate physician-patient communication to optimize expectations is crucial. We report patient understanding of HoLEP recovery and areas for future improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:E25 / E31
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Shifting Trends in Prostate Treatment: A Systematic Review Comparing Transurethral Resection of the Prostate and Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate
    Iqbal, Javed
    Mashkoor, Yusra
    Nadeem, Abdullah
    Tah, Sunanda
    Sharifa, Mouhammad
    Ghani, Saroosh
    Thugu, Thanmai Reddy
    Patel, Harshkumar
    Bonner-Reid, Felicia T.
    Shrestha, Jeena
    Hassen, Buure A.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (09)
  • [42] Bipolar, Monopolar, Photovaporization of the Prostate, or Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate How to Choose What's Best?
    Cornu, Jean-Nicolas
    UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2016, 43 (03) : 377 - +
  • [43] Day-case holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: feasibility, safety and predictive factors
    Lee, S-M
    Gordon, K.
    McMillan, R.
    Crystal, F.
    Acher, P.
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2018, 100 (06) : 475 - 479
  • [44] Surgical blood loss during holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is not affected by short-term pretreatment with dutasteride: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial on prostate vascularity
    Busetto, Gian Maria
    Del Giudice, Francesco
    Maggi, Martina
    Antonini, Gabriele
    D'Agostino, Daniele
    Romagnoli, Daniele
    Del Rosso, Alessandro
    Giampaoli, Marco
    Corsi, Paolo
    Palmer, Katie
    Ferro, Matteo
    Lucarelli, Giuseppe
    Terracciano, Daniela
    De Cobelli, Ottavio
    Sciarra, Alessandro
    De Berardinis, Ettore
    Porreca, Angelo
    AGING-US, 2020, 12 (05): : 4337 - 4347
  • [45] Factors Influencing Intraoperative Blood Loss in Patients Undergoing Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Large Multicenter Analysis
    Romero-Otero, Javier
    Garcia-Gonzalez, Lucia
    Garcia-Gomez, Borja
    Justo-Quintas, Juan
    Garcia-Rojo, Esther
    Antonio Gonzalez-Padilla, Daniel
    Sopena-Sutil, Raquel
    Manuel Duarte-Ojeda, Jose
    Rodriguez-Antolin, Alfredo
    UROLOGY, 2019, 132 : 177 - 182
  • [46] Endoscopic enucleation for prostate larger than 60 mL: comparison between holmium laser enucleation and plasmakinetic enucleation
    Patard, P. - M.
    Roumiguie, M.
    Sanson, S.
    Beauval, J. - B.
    Huyghe, E.
    Soulie, M.
    Malavaud, B.
    Game, X.
    Rischmann, P.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (06) : 2011 - 2018
  • [47] Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: A truly size-independent method?
    Tamalunas, Alexander
    Westhofen, Thilo
    Schott, Melanie
    Keller, Patrick
    Atzler, Michael
    Stief, Christian G.
    Magistro, Giuseppe
    LUTS-LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS, 2021, : 17 - 26
  • [48] Salvage versus primary holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: trends, outcomes and safety analysis
    Durant, Adri M.
    Moore, Jonathan
    Voleti, Sandeep
    Wu, Sarah
    Mi, Lanyu
    Narang, Gopal
    Cheney, Scott
    Humphreys, Mitchell
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 40 (09) : 2305 - 2312
  • [49] Holmium laser prostate enucleation. All we should aim for
    Ramon Perez-Carral, Jose
    Cansino, Ramon
    Trelles, Carlos
    Miguel Quintana, Luis
    Antonio Mainez, Juan
    Martinez-Pineiro, Luis
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2020, 73 (08): : 699 - 708
  • [50] Effect of detrusor underactivity on surgical outcomes of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate
    Jeong, Hyun Ju
    Lee, Hyomyoung
    Choo, Min Soo
    Cho, Sung Yong
    Jeong, Seong Jin
    Oh, Seung-June
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 133 (06) : 770 - 777