Understanding holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) recovery: Assessing patient expectations and understanding

被引:4
|
作者
Assmus, Mark A. [1 ]
Lee, Matthew S. [2 ]
Large, Tim [1 ]
Krambeck, Amy E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Urol, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Urol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
来源
CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL | 2022年 / 16卷 / 01期
关键词
URINARY-TRACT SYMPTOMS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.5489/cuaj.7328
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Although holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is a highly effective surgery, there is a variable recovery period where patients may experience hematuria, dysuria, or urinary incontinence (UI). Despite preoperative consultation, there is a paucity of literature examining the effectiveness of physician-patient communication in preparing the patient for the postoperative recovery period. We sought to examine recovery expectations as a patient-reported outcome (PRO) metric for HoLEP. Methods: With institutional review board approval, we queried our electronic medical record and retrospective clinical registry to identify 50 consecutive patients that underwent HoLEP from November 2019 to March 2020 by two endourologists. Patients were provided questionnaires via Twistle(C) >= 6 months postoperatively. Patient demographics and perioperative course was examined in the context of responses. Our primary objective was determining whether patients felt they had a reasonable understanding of the recovery process. Results: We observed a 92% (46/50) response rate, with an average patient age of 69.4 years (range 55-88). Overall, 91.3% (42/46) felt they had a reasonable understanding of the recovery. Additionally, 97.8% (45/46) were aware of temporary UI, with 87% having >= 1 episodes of UI after catheter removal. We found 47.8% (22/46) of patients expected UI to resolve within 30 days, while 8.6% expected >90 days of UI. All patients wore aware of the risk of hematuria, with 93.5% (43/46) expecting resolution within 30 days (<7 days: 47.8%; 7-14 days: 28.3%; 15-30 days: 17.4%). Conclusions: Although surgical technique continues to improve HoLEP, ensuring adequate physician-patient communication to optimize expectations is crucial. We report patient understanding of HoLEP recovery and areas for future improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:E25 / E31
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The low power effect on holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP); A comparison between 20W and 37,5W energy regarding apical enucleation efficacy and patient safety
    Gazel, E.
    Kaya, E.
    Yalcin, S.
    Tokas, T.
    Aybal, H. C.
    Yilmaz, S.
    Aydogan, T. B.
    Tunc, L.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2020, 30 (12): : 632 - 638
  • [32] Super early detailed assessment of lower urinary tract symptoms after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP): a prospective study
    Ahyai, Sascha A.
    Marik, Irina
    Ludwig, Tim A.
    Becker, Andreas
    Asdjodi, Saman
    Kluth, Luis
    Chun, Felix
    Fisch, Margit
    Schmid, Marianne
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 38 (12) : 3207 - 3217
  • [33] Comparative efficacy and safety of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) using moses technology and standard HoLEP: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression
    Ramadhani, Muhammad Zaniar
    Kloping, Yudhistira Pradnyan
    Rahman, Ilham Akbar
    Yogiswara, Niwanda
    Renaldo, Johan
    Wirjopranoto, Soetojo
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2022, 81
  • [34] Metabolic syndrome is associated with postoperative complications after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate
    Edmonds, Victoria S.
    Heidenberg, Daniel J.
    Mayes, Connor
    Mead-Harvey, Carolyn
    Humphreys, Mitchell R.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2025, 135 (04) : 684 - 690
  • [35] Salvage holmium laser enucleation of the prostate after previous interventions: a systematic review
    Kallidonis, Panagiotis
    Spinos, Theodoros
    Peteinaris, Angelis
    Somani, Bhaskar
    Liatsikos, Evangelos
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 133 (02) : 141 - 151
  • [36] A Cost Comparison of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate with and without Moses™
    Lee, Matthew S.
    Assmus, Mark
    Agarwal, Deepak
    Large, Tim
    Krambeck, Amy
    UROLOGY PRACTICE, 2021, 8 (06) : 624 - 629
  • [37] Perioperative Outcomes of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: A Systematic Review
    Porreca, Angelo
    Colicchia, Michele
    Tafuri, Alessandro
    D'Agostino, Daniele
    Busetto, Gian Maria
    Crestani, Alessandro
    Odorizzi, Katia
    Amigoni, Nelia
    Rizzetto, Riccardo
    Gozzo, Alessandra
    Gallina, Sebastian
    Bianchi, Lorenzo
    Ferro, Matteo
    Falabella, Roberto
    Romagnoli, Daniele
    Antonelli, Alessandro
    Corsi, Paolo
    Schiavina, Riccardo
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2022, 106 (10) : 979 - 991
  • [38] Initial experience with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in a urology specialist hospital in Nigeria
    Undie, Celsus Ukelina
    Nnana, Ewomazino Ibanga
    Torporo, Kalenebari Raymond
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 27 (01)
  • [39] Evidence-based outcomes of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate
    Large, Tim
    Krambeck, Amy E.
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2018, 28 (03) : 301 - 308
  • [40] Evaluation of Renal Function Recovery After Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease
    Black, Morgan
    Slade, Austen
    Caras, Ronald Joseph
    DeLeon, Genaro A.
    Large, Tim
    Shelton, Thomas M.
    Tong, Yan
    Rivera, Marcelino
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2023, 37 (07) : 817 - 822