Applying non-animal strategies for assessing skin sensitisation report from an EPAA/cefic-LRI/IFRA Europe cross sector workshop, ECHA helsinki, February 7th and 8th 2019

被引:9
作者
Basketter, David [1 ]
Azam, Philippe [2 ]
Casati, Silvia [3 ]
Corvaro, Marco [4 ]
Ezendam, Janine [5 ]
Griem, Peter [6 ]
Hubesch, Bruno [7 ,8 ]
Irizar, Amaia [9 ]
Kern, Petra [10 ]
Manou, Irene [11 ]
Mehling, Annette [12 ]
Rossi, Laura H. [13 ]
机构
[1] DABMEB Consultancy Ltd, Sharnbrook MK44 1PR, Beds, England
[2] Solvay, St Fons, France
[3] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Ispra, Italy
[4] Corteva AgriSci, Rome, Italy
[5] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm, Ctr Hlth Protect, Bilthoven, Netherlands
[6] Symrise AG, Holzminden, Germany
[7] Hubesch Consult BVBA, Sint Pieters Leeuw, Belgium
[8] European Chem Ind Council Cefic, Brussels, Belgium
[9] Int Fragrance Assoc IFRA, Geneva, Switzerland
[10] Procter & Gamble, Strombeek Bever, Belgium
[11] European Partnership Alternat Approaches Anim Tes, Brussels, Belgium
[12] BASF Personal Care & Nutr GmbH, Dusseldorf, Germany
[13] European Chem Agcy ECHA, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
Skin sensitisation; In vitro alternatives; Hazard classification; Potency sub-categorisation; Integrated testing strategies; Integrated approaches to testing and assessment; Defined approaches; LYMPH-NODE ASSAY; QUANTITATIVE RISK-ASSESSMENT; TESTING STRATEGIES; REGULATORY USE; IN-VITRO; POTENCY; HAZARD; CATEGORIZATION; ALTERNATIVES; CHEMICALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.104477
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
Four years on since the last cross sector workshop, experience of the practical application and interpretation of several non-animal assays that contribute to the predictive identification of skin sensitisers has begun to accumulate. Non-animal methods used for hazard assessments increasingly are contributing to the potency sub-categorisation for regulatory purposes. However, workshop participants generally supported the view that there remained a pressing need to build confidence in how information from multiple methods can be combined for classification, sub-categorisation and potency assessment. Furthermore, the practical experience gained over the last few years, highlighted the overall high potential value of using the newly validated methods and testing strategies, but also that limitations for certain substance/product classes may become evident with further use as had been the case with other new regulatory methods. As the available information increases, review of the data and collated experience could further determine strengths and limitations leading to more confidence in their use. Finally, the need for a substantial and universally accepted dataset of non-sensitisers and substances of different sensitising potencies, based on combined human and in vivo animal data for validation of methods and test strategies was re-emphasised.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Alternative (non-animal) methods for cosmetics testing: current status and future prospects-2010 [J].
Adler, Sarah ;
Basketter, David ;
Creton, Stuart ;
Pelkonen, Olavi ;
van Benthem, Jan ;
Zuang, Valerie ;
Andersen, Klaus Ejner ;
Angers-Loustau, Alexandre ;
Aptula, Aynur ;
Bal-Price, Anna ;
Benfenati, Emilio ;
Bernauer, Ulrike ;
Bessems, Jos ;
Bois, Frederic Y. ;
Boobis, Alan ;
Brandon, Esther ;
Bremer, Susanne ;
Broschard, Thomas ;
Casati, Silvia ;
Coecke, Sandra ;
Corvi, Raffaella ;
Cronin, Mark ;
Daston, George ;
Dekant, Wolfgang ;
Felter, Susan ;
Grignard, Elise ;
Gundert-Remy, Ursula ;
Heinonen, Tuula ;
Kimber, Ian ;
Kleinjans, Jos ;
Komulainen, Hannu ;
Kreiling, Reinhard ;
Kreysa, Joachim ;
Leite, Sofia Batista ;
Loizou, George ;
Maxwell, Gavin ;
Mazzatorta, Paolo ;
Munn, Sharon ;
Pfuhler, Stefan ;
Phrakonkham, Pascal ;
Piersma, Aldert ;
Poth, Albrecht ;
Prieto, Pilar ;
Repetto, Guillermo ;
Rogiers, Vera ;
Schoeters, Greet ;
Schwarz, Michael ;
Serafimova, Rositsa ;
Tahti, Hanna ;
Testai, Emanuela .
ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY, 2011, 85 (05) :367-485
[2]   The regulatory use of the Local Lymph Node Assay for the notification of new chemicals in Europe [J].
Angers-Loustau, Alexandre ;
Tosti, Luca ;
Casati, Silvia .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2011, 60 (03) :300-307
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, OECD ENV HLTH SAF PU, V168, P1
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, GUID INF REQ CHEM SA
[5]   Fragrances Categorized According to Relative Human Skin Sensitization Potency [J].
Api, Anne Marie ;
Parakhia, Rahul ;
O'Brien, Devin ;
Basketter, David A. .
DERMATITIS, 2017, 28 (05) :299-307
[6]   Dermal sensitization quantitative risk assessment (QRA) for fragrance ingredients [J].
Api, Anne Marie ;
Basketter, David A. ;
Cadby, Peter A. ;
Cano, Marie-France ;
Ellis, Graham ;
Gerberick, G. Frank ;
Griem, Peter ;
McNamee, Pauline M. ;
Ryan, Cindy A. ;
Safford, Robert .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2008, 52 (01) :3-23
[7]   Evaluating the sensitization potential of surfactants: Integrating data from the local lymph node assay, guinea pig maximization test, and in vitro methods in a weight-of-evidence approach [J].
Ball, Nicholas ;
Cagen, Stuart ;
Carrillo, Juan-Carlos ;
Certa, Hans ;
Eigler, Dorothea ;
Emter, Roger ;
Faulhammer, Frank ;
Garcia, Christine ;
Graham, Cynthia ;
Hauxi, Carl ;
Kolle, Susanne N. ;
Kreiling, Reinhard ;
Natsch, Andreas ;
Mehling, Annette .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2011, 60 (03) :389-400
[8]  
Basketter D.A., 2017, ALTERNATIVES DERMAL, P215
[9]   Skin sensitization quantitative risk assessment: A review of underlying assumptions [J].
Basketter, David ;
Safford, Bob .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 74 :105-116
[10]   Alternatives for skin sensitisation: Hazard identification and potency categorisation: Report from an EPAA/CEFIC LRI/Cosmetics Europe cross sector workshop, ECHA Helsinki, April 23rd and 24th 2015 [J].
Basketter, David ;
Ashikaga, Takao ;
Casati, Silvia ;
Hubesch, Bruno ;
Jaworska, Joanna ;
de Knecht, Joop ;
Landsiedel, Robert ;
Manou, Irene ;
Mehling, Annette ;
Petersohn, Dirk ;
Rorije, Emiel ;
Rossi, Laura H. ;
Steiling, Winfried ;
Teissier, Silvia ;
Worth, Andrew .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2015, 73 (02) :660-666