Bibliometric Review of Biodiversity Offsetting During 1992-2019

被引:5
作者
Yu, Shuling [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cui, Baoshan [1 ,3 ]
Xie, Chengjie [1 ,3 ]
Man, Ying [1 ,3 ]
Fu, Jing [4 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Lab Water Environm Simulat, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] Tiangong Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Tianjin 300387, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Educ, Yellow River Estuary Wetland Ecosyst Observat & R, Dongying 257500, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Fishery Sci, East China Sea Fisheries Res Inst, Shanghai 200090, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
academic influence; biodiversity offsetting; compensation; bibliometric analysis; social network analysis; NO NET LOSS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; CONSERVATION; POLICY; RESTORATION; IMPACT; RECLAMATION; CHALLENGES; INNOVATION; SITES;
D O I
10.1007/s11769-022-1265-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Biodiversity offsetting plays a crucial role in managing the impacts of development on natural habitats. Developers, conservation groups, governments and financial institutions have used biodiversity offsetting to design measurable conservation actions to compensate for significant residual adverse biodiversity impacts arising from development. However, the concepts and methodologies of biodiversity offsetting have rarely been systematically reviewed, and best practices are still lacking. This hinders the development and applications of this field, and makes it difficult for new researchers to learn, develop, and apply biodiversity offsetting. This paper aims to review research progress on biodiversity offsetting during the period of 1992 to 2019. We mainly used bibliometric analysis and social network analysis methods to expose the topic diversity, development and promotion of this research field, and assess collaboration among biodiversity offsetting scholars. Our research identified 1190 records, and revealed that the total number of publications increased rapidly since 2002. The most productive journal, country, and author were Biological Conservation, USA, and Dr. Maron M of University of Queensland, respectively. Co-author analysis identified that the 23 authors most relevant to biodiversity offsetting were involved in a collaboration network. And they were mainly from 30 countries in a collaboration network, and the authors from USA, Australia and the United Kingdom have the most cooperation, which mainly driven by policy related to biodiversity offsetting. Our review shows that biodiversity offsetting research is at an early stage of rapid development with topically diverse and collaborative science domains. The majority of studies focus on terrestrial environments, which makes the implementation of aquatic ecosystem is more difficult. Theoretical problems and the implications of research evolution and social network in biodiversity offsetting are discussed, and further development of the theory and methodologies of biodiversity offsetting and management was recommend.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 203
页数:15
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]   Integrating biodiversity offsets within Circular Economy policy in China [J].
Ali, Mustafa ;
Kennedy, Christina M. ;
Kiesecker, Joe ;
Geng, Yong .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 185 :32-43
[2]  
Ambrose RichardF., 2000, Wetlands, V19, P1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, GLOB EC PROSP 2006 E
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Standard on Biodiversity Offsets
[5]   bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis [J].
Aria, Massimo ;
Cuccurullo, Corrado .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2017, 11 (04) :959-975
[6]  
Authority EP.,, 2008, GUID ASS ENV FACT AC
[7]  
Authority EP, 2006, POS STAT NO 9 ENV OF
[8]   Deconstructing ecosystem services: Uncertainties and controversies around a socially constructed concept [J].
Barnaud, Cecile ;
Antona, Martine .
GEOFORUM, 2014, 56 :113-123
[9]  
BBOP, 2009, Biodiversity Offset Implementation Handbook
[10]   The biodiversity bank cannot be a lending bank [J].
Bekessy, Sarah A. ;
Wintle, Brendan A. ;
Lindenmayer, David B. ;
Mccarthy, Michael A. ;
Colyvan, Mark ;
Burgman, Mark A. ;
Possingham, Hugh P. .
CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2010, 3 (03) :151-158