Thermoeconomic analysis of multi-stage recuperative Brayton power cycles: Part I- hybridization with a solar power tower system

被引:38
作者
Mohammadi, Kasra [1 ]
McGowan, Jon G. [1 ]
Saghafifar, Mohammad [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[2] Univ Cambridge, Dept Engn, Trumpington St, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, England
关键词
Multi-stage Brayton cycles; Recuperation; Solar power tower; Hybridization; Thermodynamic and economic analyses; LCOE; HELIOSTAT FIELD COLLECTOR; INTERCOOLED GAS-TURBINE; AIR RECEIVER; OPTIMIZATION; DESIGN; PLANT; PERFORMANCE; GENERATION; STRATEGY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2019.02.012
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper, which is the first part of a study on multi-stage recuperative Brayton cycle configurations, evaluates the thermodynamic and economic feasibility of hybridizing different multi-stage recuperative Brayton cycle configurations with a solar power tower using a pressurized air receiver. In part 2 of this work, the waste energy recovery from non-solar multi-stage recuperative Brayton cycle configurations is evaluated from both thermodynamic and economic viewpoints. The results of this first part of work show that the employment of multi-stage recuperative Brayton cycle configurations leads to a significant increase in the thermal efficiency and a reduction in the fuel consumption, CO2 emissions and levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) for both non-solar and hybrid solar power plants. For non-solar power plants, the cycle configuration with 4 stages of intercooling and reheating showed the highest thermal efficiency (53.6%) and the lowest LCOE ($57.80/MWh) leading to a 32% increase and a 17% decrease compared to a simple recuperative Brayton cycle. Results of this study demonstrate that hybridization of multi-stage recuperative Brayton cycle configurations with a power tower plant with a pressurized air receiver is not economically and environmentally attractive at current time. The main reasons are the technological limitations of pressurized air receiver due to lower temperature (1223 K) and pressure (30 bar) as well as the high cost of solar power tower system (especially the heliostats). Advances in the future that enables a higher output temperature and pressure for the receiver as well as reduction in the heliostats and receiver costs would certainly be useful in improving the economic and environmental attractiveness of such hybridizations.
引用
收藏
页码:898 / 919
页数:22
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1991, PLANT DESIGN EC CHEM
[2]  
[Anonymous], ANAL SYNTHESIS DESIG
[3]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[4]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, AC COMM V10 297
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1998, THESIS
[7]  
[Anonymous], PROJ COSTS GEN EL
[8]   Optimization of heliostat field layout in solar central receiver systems on annual basis using differential evolution algorithm [J].
Atif, Maimoon ;
Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A. .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 95 :1-9
[9]   A computationally efficient method for the design of the heliostat field for solar power tower plant [J].
Besarati, Saeb M. ;
Goswami, D. Yogi .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2014, 69 :226-232
[10]   Thermo-economic analysis of an intercooled, reheat and recuperated gas turbine for cogeneration applications - Part I: Base load operation [J].
Bhargava, R ;
Bianchi, M ;
di Montenegro, GN ;
Peretto, A .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2002, 124 (01) :147-154