The Effects of Controlled Breathing during Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients with COPD

被引:15
作者
van Gestel, Arnoldus J. R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kohler, Malcolm [3 ]
Steier, Joerg [4 ,5 ]
Teschler, Sebastian [2 ]
Russi, Erich W. [3 ]
Teschler, Helmut [2 ]
机构
[1] Zurich Univ Appl Sci, CH-8401 Winterthur, Switzerland
[2] Univ Hosp Ruhrlandklin, Dept Pneumol, Essen, Germany
[3] Univ Zurich Hosp, Div Pulm, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Kings Coll London, Sch Med, London WC2R 2LS, England
[5] Royal Brompton Hosp, London SW3 6LY, England
关键词
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Controlled breathing; Respiratory biofeedback; Pulmonary rehabilitation; Diaphragmatic breathing; Pursed lips breathing; HEART-RATE-VARIABILITY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ACUTE EXACERBATIONS; LUNG-FUNCTION; DISEASE; EXERCISE; DYSPNEA; BIOFEEDBACK; PRESSURE; PATTERN;
D O I
10.1159/000324449
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Conventional pulmonary rehabilitation programs improve exercise tolerance but have no effect on pulmonary function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The role of controlled breathing using respiratory biofeedback during rehabilitation of patients with COPD remains unclear. Objectives: To compare the effects of a conventional 4-week pulmonary rehabilitation program with those of rehabilitation plus controlled breathing interventions. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was performed. Pulmonary function (FEV1), exercise capacity (6-min walking distance, 6MWD), health-related quality of life (chronic respiratory questionnaire, CRQ) and cardiac autonomic function (rMSSD) were evaluated. Results: Forty COPD patients (mean +/- SD age 66.1 +/- 6.4, FEV1 45.9 +/- 17.4% predicted) were randomized to rehabilitation (n = 20) or rehabilitation plus controlled breathing (n = 20). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding the change in FEV1 (mean difference-0.8% predicted, 95% CI-4.4 to 2.9% predicted, p = 0.33), 6MWD (mean difference 12.2 m, 95% CI-37.4 to 12.2 m, p = 0.16), CRQ (mean difference in total score 0.2, 95% CI-0.1 to 0.4, p = 0.11) and rMSSD (mean difference 2.2 ms, 95% CI-20.8 to 25.1 ms, p = 0.51). Conclusions: In patients with COPD undergoing a pulmonary rehabilitation program, controlled breathing using respiratory biofeedback has no effect on exercise capacity, pulmonary function, quality of life or cardiac autonomic function. Copyright (C) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 124
页数:10
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
BARACH AL, 1973, B NEW YORK ACAD MED, V49, P666
[2]  
Bartels MN, 2003, CHEST, V124, P863
[3]  
Bekkering EC., 2000, PHYS THER REV, V5, P559, DOI [10.1179/ptr.2000.5.1.59, DOI 10.1179/PTR.2000.5.1.59]
[4]   Chest wall kinematics and breathlessness during pursed-lip breathing in patients with COPD [J].
Bianchi, R ;
Gigliotti, F ;
Rontagnoli, I ;
Lanini, B ;
Castellani, C ;
Grazzini, M ;
Scano, G .
CHEST, 2004, 125 (02) :459-465
[5]   THE PATTERN OF RESPIRATORY MUSCLE RECRUITMENT DURING PURSED-LIP BREATHING [J].
BRESLIN, EH .
CHEST, 1992, 101 (01) :75-78
[6]   CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE INCREASES HEART-RATE-VARIABILITY IN CONGESTIVE-HEART-FAILURE [J].
BUTLER, GC ;
NAUGHTON, MT ;
RAHMAN, MA ;
BRADLEY, TD ;
FLORAS, JS .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1995, 25 (03) :672-679
[7]  
Cahalin Lawrence P, 2002, J Cardiopulm Rehabil, V22, P7, DOI 10.1097/00008483-200201000-00002
[8]  
Cahalin LP, 2005, PHYS THER, V85, P369
[9]  
Camm AJ, 1996, EUR HEART J, V17, P354
[10]   Influence of exercise training on cardiac baroreflex sensitivity in patients with COPD [J].
Costes, F ;
Roche, F ;
Pichot, V ;
Vergnon, JM ;
Garet, M ;
Barthelemy, JC .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2004, 23 (03) :396-401