A Bayesian network meta-analysis for binary outcome: how to do it

被引:57
|
作者
Greco, Teresa [1 ,2 ]
Landoni, Giovanni [1 ]
Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe [3 ,4 ]
D'Ascenzo, Fabrizio [4 ,5 ]
Zangrillo, Alberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Ist Sci San Raffaele, Anaesthesia & Intens Care Dept, Via Olgettina 60, I-20132 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Sect Med Stat & Biometry Giulio A Maccacaro, Dept Occupat & Environm Hlth, Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Med Surg Sci & Biotechnol, Rome, Italy
[4] Meta Anal & Evidence Based Med Training Cardiol M, Ospedaletti, Italy
[5] Citta Salute & Sci, Dept Internal Med, Div Cardiol, Turin, Italy
关键词
anaesthetic agents; Bayesian; binary outcomes; hierarchical models; mixed treatment comparison; network meta-analysis; WinBUGS; MIXED TREATMENT COMPARISONS; ISPOR TASK-FORCE; STATISTICAL-METHODS; ECOLOGICAL BIAS; META-REGRESSION; PATIENT-LEVEL; HETEROGENEITY; INCONSISTENCY; LIKELIHOOD; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1177/0962280213500185
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
This study presents an overview of conceptual and practical issues of a network meta-analysis (NMA), particularly focusing on its application to randomised controlled trials with a binary outcome of interest. We start from general considerations on NMA to specifically appraise how to collect study data, structure the analytical network and specify the requirements for different models and parameter interpretations, with the ultimate goal of providing physicians and clinician-investigators a practical tool to understand pros and cons of NMA. Specifically, we outline the key steps, from the literature search to sensitivity analysis, necessary to perform a valid NMA of binomial data, exploiting Markov Chain Monte Carlo approaches. We also apply this analytical approach to a case study on the beneficial effects of volatile agents compared to total intravenous anaesthetics for surgery to further clarify the statistical details of the models, diagnostics and computations. Finally, datasets and models for the freeware WinBUGS package are presented for the anaesthetic agent example.
引用
收藏
页码:1757 / 1773
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Simulation and data-generation for random-effects network meta-analysis of binary outcome
    Seide, Svenja E.
    Jensen, Katrin
    Kieser, Meinhard
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2019, 38 (17) : 3288 - 3303
  • [42] Meta-analysis of a binary outcome using individual participant data and aggregate data
    Riley, Richard D.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2010, 1 (01) : 2 - 19
  • [43] Network meta-analysis of longitudinal data using fractional polynomials
    Jansen, J. P.
    Vieira, M. C.
    Cope, S.
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2015, 34 (15) : 2294 - 2311
  • [44] An appraisal of meta-analysis guidelines: how do they relate to safety outcomes?
    Bennetts, Meg
    Whalen, Ed
    Ahadieh, Sima
    Cappelleri, Joseph C.
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2017, 8 (01) : 64 - 78
  • [45] Bayesian inference for heterogeneity in meta-analysis
    Bodnar, Olha
    Muhumuza, Rebecca Nalule
    Possolo, Antonio
    METROLOGIA, 2020, 57 (06)
  • [46] Acupuncture for migraine prophylaxis: A protocol for systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
    Zhu, Wenyan
    Cai, Yiwen
    Zhan, Yijun
    Wang, Liaoyao
    Wu, Yue
    Pei, Jian
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (51)
  • [47] How do we define normal bowel frequency from newborn to teens?: A Bayesian meta-analysis
    Munasinghe, Sachith
    Manathunga, Supun
    Hathagoda, Wathsala
    Kuruppu, Chandrani
    Ranasinghe, Priyanga
    Devanarayana, Niranga M.
    Baaleman, Desiree F.
    Benninga, Marc A.
    Rajindrajith, Shaman
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION, 2024,
  • [48] Predictive P-score for treatment ranking in Bayesian network meta-analysis
    Kristine J. Rosenberger
    Rui Duan
    Yong Chen
    Lifeng Lin
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 21
  • [49] Comparative Efficacy of Therapeutics for Chronic Cancer Pain: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis
    Huang, Rongzhong
    Jiang, Lihong
    Cao, Yu
    Liu, Hongli
    Ping, Minsheng
    Li, Wei
    Xu, Yu
    Ning, Jie
    Chen, Yuqing
    Wang, Xiaojing
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (20) : 1742 - +
  • [50] Interpreting Indirect Treatment Comparisons and Network Meta-Analysis for Health-Care Decision Making: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 1
    Jansen, Jeroen P.
    Fleurence, Rachael
    Devine, Beth
    Itzler, Robbin
    Barrett, Annabel
    Hawkins, Neil
    Lee, Karen
    Boersma, Cornelis
    Annemans, Lieven
    Cappelleri, Joseph C.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (04) : 417 - 428