Brachial plexus dose tolerance in head and neck cancer patients treated with sequential intensity modulated radiation therapy

被引:15
作者
Thomas, Tarita O. [1 ]
Refaat, Tamer [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Choi, Mehee [1 ]
Bacchus, Ian [1 ]
Sachdev, Sean [1 ]
Rademaker, Alfred W. [2 ]
Sathiaseelan, Vythialingam [1 ]
Karagianis, Achilles [3 ]
Mittal, Bharat B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Robert H Lurie Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Robert H Lurie Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Prevent Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Robert H Lurie Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] NMDTI, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Univ Alexandria, Fac Med, Dept Clin Oncol & Nucl Med, Alexandria, Egypt
来源
RADIATION ONCOLOGY | 2015年 / 10卷
关键词
Brachial plexus; Radiation; Tolerance; NORMAL TISSUE; PLEXOPATHY; COMPLICATION; RADIOTHERAPY; IMRT;
D O I
10.1186/s13014-015-0409-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: We aimed to study the radiation induced brachial plexopathy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with Sequential Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (S-IMRT). Methods and materials: This IRB approved study included 68 patients with HNSCC treated consecutively. Detailed dose volume histogram data was generated for ipsilateral and contralateral brachial plexus (BP) volumes receiving a specified dose (Vds) i.e. V50-V75 and dose in Gray covering specified percent of BP volume (Dvs) i.e. D5-D30 and maximum point doses (Dmax). To assess BP injury all patients' charts were reviewed in detail for sign and symptoms of BP damage. Post-hoc comparisons were done using Tukey-Kramer method to account for multiple significance testing. Results: The mean and maximum doses to BP were significantly different (p < .05) based on tumor site, nodal status and tumor stage. The mean volume to the ipsilateral BP for V50, V60, V70, and V75 were 7.01 cc, 4.37 cc, 1.47 cc and 0.24 cc, respectively. The mean dose delivered to <= 5% of ipsilateral BP was 68.70 Gy (median 69.5Gy). None of the patients had acute or late brachial plexopathy or any other significant neurological complications, with a minimum follow up of two years (mean 54 months). Conclusions: In this study cohort, at a minimum of two-years follow up, the mean dose of 68.7Gy, a median dose to 69.5Gy to <= 5% of ipsilateral BP, and a median Dmax of 72.96Gy did not result in BP injury when patients were treated with S-IMRT technique. However, longer follow up is needed.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Acute toxicity in patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy with proton versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy for nonmetastatic head and neck cancers
    Kim, Kristine N.
    Harton, Joanna
    Mitra, Nandita
    Lukens, John N.
    Lin, Alexander
    Amaniera, Isabella
    Doucette, Abigail
    Gabriel, Peter
    Baumann, Brian
    Metz, James
    Wojcieszynski, Andrzej
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2022, 44 (11): : 2386 - 2394
  • [42] Outcome and Toxicity for Patients Treated with Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer
    Vora, Sujay A.
    Wong, William W.
    Schild, Steven E.
    Ezzell, Gary A.
    Andrews, Paul E.
    Ferrigni, Robert G.
    Swanson, Scott K.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 190 (02) : 521 - 526
  • [43] Fatigue is associated with inflammation in patients with head and neck cancer before and after intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Xiao, Canhua
    Beitler, Jonathan J.
    Higgins, Kristin A.
    Conneely, Karen
    Dwivedi, Bhakti
    Felger, Jennifer
    Wommack, Evanthia C.
    Shin, Dong M.
    Saba, Nabil F.
    Ong, Luke Yeeloo
    Kowalski, Jeanne
    Bruner, Deborah W.
    Miller, Andrew H.
    BRAIN BEHAVIOR AND IMMUNITY, 2016, 52 : 145 - 152
  • [44] Assessment of dose gradient index variation during simultaneously integrated boost intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck cancer patients
    Al-Rawi, Salam Abdulrazzaq Ibrahim
    Abouelenein, Hassan
    EL Nagdy, Mohamad El-Sayed
    Alabdei, Haidar Hamza
    Sulaiman, Awf Abdulrahman
    Al-Nuaimi, Dalya Saad
    Khalil, Magdy Mohammed
    Alshewered, Ahmed Salih
    PRECISION RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 6 (03): : 216 - 224
  • [45] Prevention of osteoradionecrosis in patients with head and neck cancer treated with radiation therapy
    Naseer, Amara
    Brennan, Sinead
    Maccarthy, Denise
    O'Connell, John Edward
    O'Sullivan, Eleanor
    Leech, Michelle
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2025, 47 (02): : 472 - 484
  • [46] A scoring system predicting acute radiation dermatitis in patients with head and neck cancer treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Mitsue Kawamura
    Michio Yoshimura
    Hiromi Asada
    Mitsuhiro Nakamura
    Yukinori Matsuo
    Takashi Mizowaki
    Radiation Oncology, 14
  • [47] Vestibular disorders and nausea during head and neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Berta, E.
    Righini, C. A.
    Chamorey, E.
    Villa, J.
    Atallah, I.
    Reyt, E.
    Coffre, A.
    Schmerber, S.
    CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2016, 20 (04): : 255 - 260
  • [48] Intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) - The future of IMRT for head and neck cancer
    Moreno, Amy C.
    Frank, Steven J.
    Garden, Adam S.
    Rosenthal, David I.
    Fuller, Clifton D.
    Gunn, Gary B.
    Reddy, Jay P.
    Morrison, William H.
    Williamson, Tyler D.
    Holliday, Emma B.
    Phan, Jack
    Blanchard, Pierre
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 88 : 66 - 74
  • [49] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the treatment of head and neck cancer involving the base of the skull
    Lee, Nancy Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 69 (02): : S43 - S45
  • [50] Hypofractionated radiation therapy for head and neck cancers in the era of intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Eom, Keun-Yong
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY JOURNAL, 2024, 42 (01): : 1 - 3