Brachial plexus dose tolerance in head and neck cancer patients treated with sequential intensity modulated radiation therapy

被引:15
|
作者
Thomas, Tarita O. [1 ]
Refaat, Tamer [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Choi, Mehee [1 ]
Bacchus, Ian [1 ]
Sachdev, Sean [1 ]
Rademaker, Alfred W. [2 ]
Sathiaseelan, Vythialingam [1 ]
Karagianis, Achilles [3 ]
Mittal, Bharat B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Robert H Lurie Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Robert H Lurie Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Prevent Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Robert H Lurie Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] NMDTI, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Univ Alexandria, Fac Med, Dept Clin Oncol & Nucl Med, Alexandria, Egypt
来源
RADIATION ONCOLOGY | 2015年 / 10卷
关键词
Brachial plexus; Radiation; Tolerance; NORMAL TISSUE; PLEXOPATHY; COMPLICATION; RADIOTHERAPY; IMRT;
D O I
10.1186/s13014-015-0409-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: We aimed to study the radiation induced brachial plexopathy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with Sequential Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (S-IMRT). Methods and materials: This IRB approved study included 68 patients with HNSCC treated consecutively. Detailed dose volume histogram data was generated for ipsilateral and contralateral brachial plexus (BP) volumes receiving a specified dose (Vds) i.e. V50-V75 and dose in Gray covering specified percent of BP volume (Dvs) i.e. D5-D30 and maximum point doses (Dmax). To assess BP injury all patients' charts were reviewed in detail for sign and symptoms of BP damage. Post-hoc comparisons were done using Tukey-Kramer method to account for multiple significance testing. Results: The mean and maximum doses to BP were significantly different (p < .05) based on tumor site, nodal status and tumor stage. The mean volume to the ipsilateral BP for V50, V60, V70, and V75 were 7.01 cc, 4.37 cc, 1.47 cc and 0.24 cc, respectively. The mean dose delivered to <= 5% of ipsilateral BP was 68.70 Gy (median 69.5Gy). None of the patients had acute or late brachial plexopathy or any other significant neurological complications, with a minimum follow up of two years (mean 54 months). Conclusions: In this study cohort, at a minimum of two-years follow up, the mean dose of 68.7Gy, a median dose to 69.5Gy to <= 5% of ipsilateral BP, and a median Dmax of 72.96Gy did not result in BP injury when patients were treated with S-IMRT technique. However, longer follow up is needed.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A scoring system predicting acute radiation dermatitis in patients with head and neck cancer treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Kawamura, Mitsue
    Yoshimura, Michio
    Asada, Hiromi
    Nakamura, Mitsuhiro
    Matsuo, Yukinori
    Mizowaki, Takashi
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 14 (1)
  • [32] THE EFFECT OF SIGNIFICANT TUMOR REDUCTION ON THE DOSE DISTRIBUTION IN INTENSITY MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY FOR HEAD-AND-NECK CANCER: A CASE STUDY
    Mechalakos, James
    Lee, Nancy
    Hunt, Margie
    Ling, C. Clifton
    Amols, Howard I.
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2009, 34 (03) : 250 - 255
  • [33] Impact of patient setup error in the treatment of head and neck cancer with intensity modulated radiation therapy
    Prabhakar, Ramachandran
    Laviraj, Macherla A.
    Haresh, Kunhi Parambath
    Julka, Pramod K.
    Rath, Goura K.
    PHYSICA MEDICA, 2010, 26 (01) : 26 - 33
  • [34] Head and neck sarcoma: report of a case treated by intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Heudel, Pierre
    Biston, Marie Claude
    Fayette, Jerome
    Ramade, Antoine
    Gassa, Frederic
    Pommier, Pascal
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 15 (03) : 305 - 309
  • [35] Comparison of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for the treatment of head and neck cancer based on radiobiological modelling
    Nguyen, My-Lien
    Afrin, Kazi T.
    Newbury, Patrick
    Henson, Christina
    Ahmad, Salahuddin
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2023, 22
  • [36] Volumetric tumor burden and its effect on brachial plexus dosimetry in head and neck intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Romesser, Paul B.
    Qureshi, Muhammad M.
    Kovalchuk, Nataliya
    Minh Tam Truong
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2014, 39 (02) : 169 - 173
  • [37] The radiation dose tolerance of the brachial plexus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yan, Michael
    Kong, Weidong
    Kerr, Andrew
    Brundage, Michael
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 18 : 23 - 31
  • [38] Intensity modulated radiation therapy and oral mucosa sparing in Head and neck cancer patients: A systematic review on behalf of Italian Association of Radiation Oncology - Head and neck working group
    De Sanctis, V.
    Merlotti, A.
    De Felice, F.
    Trignani, M.
    Dell'Oca, I.
    Lastrucci, L.
    Molteni, M.
    Frakulli, R.
    Bunkheila, F.
    Bacigalupo, A.
    Paiar, F.
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2019, 139 : 24 - 30
  • [39] A reinforcement learning agent for head and neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Stephens, Hunter
    Li, Xinyi
    Sheng, Yang
    Wu, Qiuwen
    Ge, Yaorong
    Wu, Q. Jackie
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS, 2024, 12
  • [40] Dose to swallowing structures and dysphagia in head and neck Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy A long term prospective analysis
    Kannan, Ram Abhinav
    Ponni, Arul T. R.
    REPORTS OF PRACTICAL ONCOLOGY AND RADIOTHERAPY, 2019, 24 (06) : 654 - 659