Brachial plexus dose tolerance in head and neck cancer patients treated with sequential intensity modulated radiation therapy

被引:15
|
作者
Thomas, Tarita O. [1 ]
Refaat, Tamer [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Choi, Mehee [1 ]
Bacchus, Ian [1 ]
Sachdev, Sean [1 ]
Rademaker, Alfred W. [2 ]
Sathiaseelan, Vythialingam [1 ]
Karagianis, Achilles [3 ]
Mittal, Bharat B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Robert H Lurie Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Robert H Lurie Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Prevent Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Robert H Lurie Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] NMDTI, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Univ Alexandria, Fac Med, Dept Clin Oncol & Nucl Med, Alexandria, Egypt
来源
RADIATION ONCOLOGY | 2015年 / 10卷
关键词
Brachial plexus; Radiation; Tolerance; NORMAL TISSUE; PLEXOPATHY; COMPLICATION; RADIOTHERAPY; IMRT;
D O I
10.1186/s13014-015-0409-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: We aimed to study the radiation induced brachial plexopathy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with Sequential Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (S-IMRT). Methods and materials: This IRB approved study included 68 patients with HNSCC treated consecutively. Detailed dose volume histogram data was generated for ipsilateral and contralateral brachial plexus (BP) volumes receiving a specified dose (Vds) i.e. V50-V75 and dose in Gray covering specified percent of BP volume (Dvs) i.e. D5-D30 and maximum point doses (Dmax). To assess BP injury all patients' charts were reviewed in detail for sign and symptoms of BP damage. Post-hoc comparisons were done using Tukey-Kramer method to account for multiple significance testing. Results: The mean and maximum doses to BP were significantly different (p < .05) based on tumor site, nodal status and tumor stage. The mean volume to the ipsilateral BP for V50, V60, V70, and V75 were 7.01 cc, 4.37 cc, 1.47 cc and 0.24 cc, respectively. The mean dose delivered to <= 5% of ipsilateral BP was 68.70 Gy (median 69.5Gy). None of the patients had acute or late brachial plexopathy or any other significant neurological complications, with a minimum follow up of two years (mean 54 months). Conclusions: In this study cohort, at a minimum of two-years follow up, the mean dose of 68.7Gy, a median dose to 69.5Gy to <= 5% of ipsilateral BP, and a median Dmax of 72.96Gy did not result in BP injury when patients were treated with S-IMRT technique. However, longer follow up is needed.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The impact of dose on parotid salivary recovery in head and neck cancer patients treated with radiation therapy
    Li, Yun
    Taylor, Jeremy M. G.
    Ten Haken, Randall K.
    Eisbruch, Avraham
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 67 (03): : 660 - 669
  • [22] An Anatomically Validated Brachial Plexus Contouring Method for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning
    Van de Velde, Joris
    Audenaert, Emmanuel
    Speleers, Bruno
    Vercauteren, Tom
    Mulliez, Thomas
    Vandemaele, Pieter
    Achten, Eric
    Kerckaert, Ingrid
    D'Herde, Katharina
    De Neve, Wilfried
    Van Hoof, Tom
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (04): : 802 - 808
  • [23] Evaluation of Parotid Gland Dose Rate following Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer
    Hong, Joo-Wan
    Cho, Jae-Hwan
    Won, Hui-Su
    Moon, Deog-Hwan
    SPECTROSCOPY LETTERS, 2015, 48 (03) : 217 - 221
  • [24] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT): Toward a new standard for radiation therapy of head and neck cancer?
    Daly-Schveitzer, N.
    Julieron, M.
    Tao, Y. Gan
    Moussier, A.
    Bourhis, J.
    EUROPEAN ANNALS OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK DISEASES, 2011, 128 (05) : 241 - 247
  • [25] Delineating Neck Targets for Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy of Head and Neck Cancer
    Ben David, Merav
    Eisbruch, Avraham
    IMRT IGRT SBRT- ADVANCES IN THE TREATMENT PLANNING AND DELIVERY OF RADIOTHERAPY, 2011, 43 : 255 - 270
  • [26] Brachial Plexus Contouring with CT and MR Imaging in Radiation Therapy Planning for Head and Neck Cancer
    Minh Tam Truong
    Nadgir, Rohini N.
    Hirsch, Ariel E.
    Subramaniam, Rathan M.
    Wang, Jimmy W.
    Wu, Rebecca
    Khandekar, Melin
    Nawaz, A. Omer
    Sakai, Osamu
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2010, 30 (04) : 1095 - 1103
  • [27] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy in head and neck cancers: An update
    Lee, Nancy
    Puri, Dev R.
    Blanco, Angel I.
    Chao, K. S. Clifford
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2007, 29 (04): : 387 - 400
  • [28] Head and neck sarcoma: report of a case treated by intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Pierre Heudel
    Marie Claude Biston
    Jérome Fayette
    Antoine Ramade
    Frédéric Gassa
    Pascal Pommier
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2010, 15 : 305 - 309
  • [29] Limited Toxicity of Hypofractionated Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer
    Mayo, Zachary S.
    Ilori, Evelyn O.
    Matia, Brian
    Smile, Timothy D.
    Fleming, Christopher W.
    Reddy, Chandana A.
    Scharpf, Joseph
    Lamarre, Eric D.
    Prendes, Brandon L.
    Ku, Jamie
    Burkey, Brian B.
    Joshi, Nikhil P.
    Woody, Neil M.
    Koyfman, Shlomo A.
    Campbell, Shauna R.
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 42 (04) : 1845 - 1849
  • [30] Does weight loss predict accuracy of setup in head and neck cancer patients treated with Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy?
    De Bari, B.
    Erraisse, M. Ait
    Chekrine, T.
    Rabilloud, M.
    Shakir, I. Shakir
    Lebras, L.
    Favrel, V.
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2012, 117 (05): : 885 - 891