Brachial plexus dose tolerance in head and neck cancer patients treated with sequential intensity modulated radiation therapy

被引:15
|
作者
Thomas, Tarita O. [1 ]
Refaat, Tamer [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Choi, Mehee [1 ]
Bacchus, Ian [1 ]
Sachdev, Sean [1 ]
Rademaker, Alfred W. [2 ]
Sathiaseelan, Vythialingam [1 ]
Karagianis, Achilles [3 ]
Mittal, Bharat B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Robert H Lurie Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Robert H Lurie Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Prevent Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Robert H Lurie Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] NMDTI, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Univ Alexandria, Fac Med, Dept Clin Oncol & Nucl Med, Alexandria, Egypt
来源
RADIATION ONCOLOGY | 2015年 / 10卷
关键词
Brachial plexus; Radiation; Tolerance; NORMAL TISSUE; PLEXOPATHY; COMPLICATION; RADIOTHERAPY; IMRT;
D O I
10.1186/s13014-015-0409-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: We aimed to study the radiation induced brachial plexopathy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with Sequential Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (S-IMRT). Methods and materials: This IRB approved study included 68 patients with HNSCC treated consecutively. Detailed dose volume histogram data was generated for ipsilateral and contralateral brachial plexus (BP) volumes receiving a specified dose (Vds) i.e. V50-V75 and dose in Gray covering specified percent of BP volume (Dvs) i.e. D5-D30 and maximum point doses (Dmax). To assess BP injury all patients' charts were reviewed in detail for sign and symptoms of BP damage. Post-hoc comparisons were done using Tukey-Kramer method to account for multiple significance testing. Results: The mean and maximum doses to BP were significantly different (p < .05) based on tumor site, nodal status and tumor stage. The mean volume to the ipsilateral BP for V50, V60, V70, and V75 were 7.01 cc, 4.37 cc, 1.47 cc and 0.24 cc, respectively. The mean dose delivered to <= 5% of ipsilateral BP was 68.70 Gy (median 69.5Gy). None of the patients had acute or late brachial plexopathy or any other significant neurological complications, with a minimum follow up of two years (mean 54 months). Conclusions: In this study cohort, at a minimum of two-years follow up, the mean dose of 68.7Gy, a median dose to 69.5Gy to <= 5% of ipsilateral BP, and a median Dmax of 72.96Gy did not result in BP injury when patients were treated with S-IMRT technique. However, longer follow up is needed.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Intensity-modulated radiotherapy increases dose to the brachial plexus compared with conventional radiotherapy for head and neck cancer
    Chen, A. M.
    Hall, W. H.
    Li, B-Q
    Guiou, M.
    Wright, C.
    Mathai, M.
    Dublin, A.
    Purdy, J. A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 84 (997) : 58 - 63
  • [12] VALIDATING THE RTOG-ENDORSED BRACHIAL PLEXUS CONTOURING ATLAS: AN EVALUATION OF REPRODUCIBILITY AMONG PATIENTS TREATED BY INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY FOR HEAD-AND-NECK CANCER
    Yi, Sun K.
    Hall, William H.
    Mathai, Mathew
    Dublin, Arthur B.
    Gupta, Vishal
    Purdy, James A.
    Chen, Allen M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 82 (03): : 1060 - 1064
  • [13] Posttreatment Quality-of-Life Assessment in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Treated With Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy
    O'Neill, Michael
    Heron, Dwight E.
    Flickinger, John C.
    Smith, Ryan
    Ferris, Robert L.
    Gibson, Michael
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2011, 34 (05): : 478 - 482
  • [14] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the treatment of head and neck cancer
    Eisbruch, A
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE ONCOLOGY, 2005, 2 (01): : 34 - 39
  • [15] Dosimetric analysis and clinical outcomes of brachial plexus as an organ-at-risk in head-and-neck cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Prakash, Bhanu B.
    Yathiraj, Prahlad H.
    Sharan, T. Krishna
    Singh, Anshul
    Reddy, Anusha S.
    Chandraguthi, Srinidhi G.
    Subramanian, Ramya Bala
    Nagesh, Jyothi
    Nair, Sarath S.
    Fernandes, Donald J.
    Mamidipudi, Vidyasagar S.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 15 (03) : 522 - 527
  • [16] The effect of intravenous contrast on intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose calculations for head and neck cancer
    Liauw, SL
    Amdur, RJ
    Mendenhall, WM
    Palta, J
    Kim, S
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2005, 28 (05): : 456 - 459
  • [17] Brachial plexus dose tolerance In Nasopharyngeal Cancer patients treated with IMRT
    Besbes, Marwa
    Abidi, Rim
    ben Zid, Khadija
    Mousli, Alia
    Yousfi, Amani
    Gargouri, Walid
    Nasr, Chiraz
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S1377 - S1378
  • [18] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck cancer
    Chou, WW
    Puri, DR
    Lee, NY
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2005, 5 (03) : 515 - 521
  • [19] Importance of Radiation Oncologist Experience Among Patients With Head-and-Neck Cancer Treated With Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy
    Boero, Isabel J.
    Paravati, Anthony J.
    Xu, Beibei
    Cohen, Ezra E. W.
    Mell, Loren K.
    Quynh-Thu Le
    Murphy, James D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (07) : 684 - +
  • [20] Management of the brachial plexus in head and neck cancer
    Fockens, M. Matthijs
    Kraak, Jeroen T.
    Leemans, C. Rene
    Eerenstein, Simone E. J.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY & HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2023, 31 (02) : 105 - 110